Ubiquitination is a prominent posttranslational modification, in which the ubiquitin moiety is covalently attached to a target protein to influence protein stability, interaction partner and biological function. All seven lysine residues of ubiquitin, along with the N-terminal methionine, can each serve as a substrate for further ubiquitination, which effectuates a diverse combination of mono- or poly-ubiquitinated proteins with linear or branched ubiquitin chains. The intricately composed ubiquitin codes are then recognized by a large variety of ubiquitin binding domain (UBD)-containing proteins to participate in the regulation of various pathways to modulate the cell behavior. Viruses, as obligate parasites, involve many aspects of the cell pathways to overcome host defenses and subjugate cellular machineries. In the virus-host interactions, both the virus and the host tap into the rich source of versatile ubiquitination code in order to compete, combat, and co-evolve. Here, we review the recent literature to discuss the role of ubiquitin system as the infection progresses in virus life cycle and the importance of ubiquitin specificity in the regulation of virus-host relation.

Herpes simplex virus (HSV) is a neurotropic virus that establishes lifelong latent infection in human ganglion sensory neurons. This unique life cycle necessitates an intimate relation between the host defenses and virus counteractions over the long course of infection. Two important aspects of host anti-viral defense, nuclear substructure restriction and epigenetic chromatin regulation, have been intensively studied in the recent years. Upon viral DNA entering the nucleus, components of discrete nuclear bodies termed nuclear domain 10 (ND10), converge at viral DNA and place restrictions on viral gene expression. Meanwhile the infected cell mobilizes its histones and histone-associated repressors to force the viral DNA into nucleosome-like structures and also represses viral transcription. Both anti-viral strategies are negated by various HSV countermeasures. One HSV gene transactivator, infected cell protein 0 (ICP0), is a key player in antagonizing both the ND10 restriction and chromatin repression. On one hand, ICP0 uses its E3 ubiquitin ligase activity to target major ND10 components for proteasome-dependent degradation and thereafter disrupts the ND10 nuclear bodies. On the other hand, ICP0 participates in de-repressing the HSV chromatin by changing histone composition or modification and therefore activates viral transcription. Involvement of a single viral protein in two seemingly different pathways suggests that there is coordination in host anti-viral defense mechanisms and also cooperation in viral counteraction strategies. In this review, we summarize recent advances in understanding the role of chromatin regulation and ND10 dynamics in both lytic and latent HSV infection. We focus on the new observations showing that ND10 nuclear bodies play a critical role in cellular chromatin regulation. We intend to find the connections between the two major anti-viral defense pathways, chromatin remodeling and ND10 structure, in order to achieve a better understanding of how host orchestrates a concerted defense and how HSV adapts with and overcomes the host immunity.

Infected cell protein 0 functional domains and their coordination in herpes simplex virus replication

On entry into the nucleus, herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) DNA localizes to nuclear bodies known as ND10. Gene repression imposed by ND10 is released by a viral protein, ICP0, via degradation of the ND10 constituents promyelocytic leukemia protein (PML) and Sp100 and the subsequent dispersal of ND10 bodies. In order to understand the dynamic interaction between ICP0 and ND10, we carried out deletion mapping to identify the domains of ICP0 responsible for its association with ND10. Here, we report the following. (i) An ND10 entry signal (ND10-ES), located between residues 245 and 474, is required for ICP0 to penetrate and fuse with ND10. ICP0 lacking ND10-ES adheres to the surface of ND10 but fails to enter. (ii) In the absence of ND10-ES, the E3 ubiquitin ligase of ICP0 facilitates the transient adhesion of the truncated ICP0 to the ND10 surface, whereas the presence of ND10-ES in ICP0 renders ND10 fusion regardless of the E3 ligase activity. (iii) The C terminus of ICP0 is required for retention of ICP0 in ND10 but plays no role in the recruitment process. (iv) The adverse effects of an inactive RING domain on viral replication are partially reversed by deleting either ND10-ES or the C-terminal retention domain, suggesting that additional ICP0 functions require the release of ICP0 from ND10. Based on these results, we conclude that association of ICP0 and ND10 is a dynamic process, in which three sequential steps—adhesion, fusion, and retention—are adopted to stabilize the interaction. A faithful execution of these steps defines the ultimate productivity of the virus.

ND10 nuclear bodies, as part of the intrinsic defenses, impose repression on incoming DNA. Infected cell protein 0 (ICP0), an E3 ubiquitin ligase of HSV-1, can de-repress viral genes by degrading ND10 organizers to disrupt ND10. These events are part of the initial tug-of-war between HSV-1 and host, which determines the ultimate outcome of infection. Previously, we reported that ICP0 differentially recognizes PML isoforms. It depends on a SUMO-interaction motif located at residues 362-364 (SIM_362-364) to trigger the degradation of PML isoforms II, IV and VI, while using a bipartite sequence flanking the RING domain to degrade PML I. In this study, we investigated how SUMO-SIM interaction regulates the degradation of PML II and PML II associated proteins in ND10. We found that (i) regulation on PML II recognition and degradation existed in cells permissive or non-permissive to the ICP0-null virus; (ii) the loss of single SIM_362-364 was restored by the presence of four consecutive SIMs from RNF4, but it was not rescued when only two of the RNF4 SIMs remained; (iii) interestingly, the loss of three C-terminal SIMs of ICP0 was fully restored by four RNF4 SIMs and also partially rescued by two RNF4 SIMs; and (iv) a PML II mutant lacking both lysine SUMOylation and SIM was not recognized by ICP0 for degradation, but it was localized to ND10 and mitigated the degradation of other ND10 components, which led to delayed viral production. Taken together, SUMO regulates ICP0 substrate recognition via multiple fine-tuned mechanisms in HSV-1 infection. IMPORTANCE HSV-1 ICP0 is a multifunctional immediate early protein key to the effective replication in HSV-1 lytic cycle and reactivation in its latent cycle. It transactivates gene expression by orchestrating an overall mitigation in host intrinsic/innate restrictions. How ICP0 coordinates its multiple active domains and its diverse protein-protein interactions is a key question in understanding HSV-1 life cycle and pathogenesis. The present study focuses on delineating the regulations of SUMO-SIM interaction on the ICP0 E3 ubiquitin ligase activity in PML II degradation. For the first time, we discovered the importance of multivalency in PML II-ICP0 interaction network and reported the involvement of different regulatory mechanisms in the PML II recognition by ICP0 in HSV-1 infection.

Earlier studies reported that ICP0, a key regulatory protein encoded by herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1), binds ubiquitin-specific protease 7 (USP7). The fundamental conclusion of these studies is that depletion of USP7 destabilized ICP0, that ICP0 mediated the degradation of USP7, and that amino acid substitutions in ICP0 that abolished binding to USP7 significantly impaired the ability of HSV-1 to replicate. We show here that, indeed, depletion of USP7 leads to reduction of ICP0 and that USP7 is degraded in an ICP0-dependent manner. However, overexpression of USP7 or substitution in ICP0 of a single amino acid to abolish binding to USP7 accelerated the accumulation of viral mRNAs and proteins at early times after infection and had no deleterious effect on virus yields. A clue as to why USP7 is degraded emerged from the observation that, notwithstanding the accelerated expression of viral genes, the plaques formed by the mutant virus were very small, implying a defect in virus transmission from cell to cell.