Tiantian Ren

Tiantian Ren


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
26 December 2022 in IEEE Access
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ZZZhongbao Zhou
Zhongbao Zhou
ZSZhengyang Song
Zhengyang Song
TRTiantian Ren
Tiantian Ren
Lean YuLean Yu
Lean Yu
The traditional portfolio theory has relied heavily on historical asset returns while ignoring future information. Based on ensemble learning and maximum Sharpe ratio portfolio theory, this paper proposes a two-stage portfolio optimization method by considering asset forecast information, aming to improve the performance and robustness of a portfolio. In the first stage, concerning the underlying asset selection, we integrate six individual prediction models using the ensemble learning method to forecast the future return of assets where the assets with higher potential returns are selected for portfolio optimization. In the second stage, we propose a novel investment strategy by combining the forecasted returns of selected assets with the maximum Sharpe ratio portfolio model. In the empirical analysis, we employ the constituent stocks of China Securities Index 300 (CSI 300) to test the out-of-sample performance of the proposed strategy with several traditional portfolio strategies, including minimum variance portfolio strategy, traditional maximum Sharpe ratio portfolio strategy, 1/N portfolio strategy, and CSI 300 index. Our analytical results show that (1) compared to individual forecasting models, the ensemble learning method is more accurate in forecasting stock returns, and (2) the proposed portfolio strategy largely outperforms most of its competitors in terms of the Sharpe ratio, Sortino ratio, Omega ratio, and Calmar ratio. This indicates that the proposed two-stage portfolio optimization method is of potential to construct a promising investment strategy due to its trade-off between historical and future information of assets.

1 June 2019 in Journal of Management Science and Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ZZZhongbao Zhou
Zhongbao Zhou
TRTiantian Ren
Tiantian Ren
HXHelu Xiao
Helu Xiao
WLWen-Bin Liu
Wen-Bin Liu


29 July 2022 in RAIRO - Operations Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HXHelu Xiao
Helu Xiao
XLXin Liu
Xin Liu
TRTiantian Ren
Tiantian Ren
ZZZhongbao Zhou
Zhongbao Zhou
Traditional data envelopment analysis (DEA) and diversification DEA are two common data-driven evaluation approaches, which have been widely used in the estimation of portfolio efficiency. The above two DEA approaches usually use the risk and expected return indicators to build the input-output process of portfolios. However, this input-output process derived from the risk and expected return is inconsistent with the actual investment process, since the real input should be the initial wealth, and the output should be the terminal wealth. To address this problem, we propose a novel input-output process based on the initial and terminal wealth of portfolios. We transform the terminal wealth into the rate of return and construct a stochastic attainable set by using portfolio returns. We provide three deterministic estimation approaches to deal with the stochastic attainable set, and then obtain three deterministic attainable sets. We further propose three stochastic DEA models to estimate the portfolio efficiency by using the above three deterministic attainable sets. Finally, we provide an empirical analysis to assess the portfolio efficiency of 50 open-ended funds in China. The results show that there are some differences in the portfolio efficiency and its ranking between the proposed DEA models and the existing DEA models, which further verify the rationality of the proposed DEA models.

1 January 2019 in Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ZZZhongbao Zhou
Zhongbao Zhou
XZXimei Zeng
Ximei Zeng
HXHelu Xiao
Helu Xiao
TRTiantian Ren
Tiantian Ren
WLWenbin Liu
Wenbin Liu
This paper investigates the multiperiod asset-liability management problem with quadratic transaction costs. Under the mean-variance criteria, we construct tractability models with/without the riskless asset and obtain the pre-commitment and time-consistent investment strategies through the application of embedding scheme and backward induction approach, respectively. In addition, some conclusions in the existing literatures can be regarded as the degenerated cases under our setting. Finally, the numerical simulations are given to show the difference of frontiers derived by different strategies. Also, some interesting findings on the impact of quadratic transaction cost parameters on efficient frontiers are discussed.

17 September 2019 in Mathematics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HXHelu Xiao
Helu Xiao
TRTiantian Ren
Tiantian Ren
YBYanfei Bai
Yanfei Bai
ZZZhongbao Zhou
Zhongbao Zhou
Most of the existing literature on optimal investment-reinsurance only studies from the perspective of insurers and also treats the investment-reinsurance decision as a continuous process. However, in practice, the benefits of reinsurers cannot be ignored, nor can decision-makers engage in continuous trading. Under the discrete-time framework, we first propose a multi-period investment-reinsurance optimization problem considering the joint interests of the insurer and the reinsurer, among which their performance is measured by two generalized mean-variance criteria. We derive the time-consistent investment-reinsurance strategies for the proposed model by maximizing the weighted sum of the insurer’s and the reinsurer’s mean-variance objectives. We discuss the time-consistent investment-reinsurance strategies under two special premium principles. Finally, we provide some numerical simulations to show the impact of the intertemporal restrictions on the time-consistent investment-reinsurance strategies. These results indicate that the intertemporal restrictions will urge the insurer and the reinsurer to shrink the position invested in the risky asset; however, for the time-consistent reinsurance strategy, the impact of the intertemporal restrictions depends on who is the leader in the proposed model.