Giorgio Mangino

Dr. Giorgio Mangino

Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome, 04100 Latina, Italy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

27Years (2000-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
7 July 2020 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
IPIlaria Proietti
Ilaria Proietti
NSNevena Skroza
Nevena Skroza
SMSimone Michelini
Simone Michelini
AMALESSANDRA MAMBRIN
ALESSANDRA MAMBRIN
VBVeronica Balduzzi
Veronica Balduzzi
CPConcetta Potenza
Concetta Potenza
The BRAF inhibitors vemurafenib, dabrafenib and encorafenib are used in the treatment of patients with BRAF-mutant melanoma. They selectively target BRAF kinase and thus interfere with the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signalling pathway that regulates the proliferation and survival of melanoma cells. In addition to their molecularly targeted activity, BRAF inhibitors have immunomodulatory effects. The MAPK pathway is involved in T-cell receptor signalling, and interference in the pathway by BRAF inhibitors has beneficial effects on the tumour microenvironment and anti-tumour immune response in BRAF-mutant melanoma, including increased immune-stimulatory cytokine levels, decreased immunosuppressive cytokine levels, enhanced melanoma differentiation antigen expression and presentation of tumour antigens by HLA 1, and increased intra-tumoral T-cell infiltration and activity. These effects promote recognition of the tumour by the immune system and enhance anti-tumour T-cell responses. Combining BRAF inhibitors with MEK inhibitors provides more complete blockade of the MAPK pathway. The immunomodulatory effects of BRAF inhibition alone or in combination with MEK inhibition provide a rationale for combining these targeted therapies with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Available data support the synergy between these treatment approaches, indicating such combinations provide an additional beneficial effect on the tumour microenvironment and immune response in BRAF-mutant melanoma.

1 December 2001 in Immunity
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FMFrédérique Michel
Frédérique Michel
GAGéraldine Attal-Bonnefoy
Géraldine Attal-Bonnefoy
Giorgio ManginoGiorgio Mangino
Giorgio Mangino
SMSetsuko Mise-Omata
Setsuko Mise-Omata
OAOreste Acuto
Oreste Acuto

29 September 2020 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
IPIlaria Proietti
Ilaria Proietti
NSNevena Skroza
Nevena Skroza
NBNicoletta Bernardini
Nicoletta Bernardini
ETErsilia Tolino
Ersilia Tolino
VBVeronica Balduzzi
Veronica Balduzzi
CPConcetta Potenza
Concetta Potenza
This systematic review investigated the literature on acquired v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1 (BRAF) inhibitor resistance in patients with melanoma. We searched MEDLINE for articles on BRAF inhibitor resistance in patients with melanoma published since January 2010 in the following areas: (1) genetic basis of resistance; (2) epigenetic and transcriptomic mechanisms; (3) influence of the immune system on resistance development; and (4) combination therapy to overcome resistance. Common resistance mutations in melanoma are BRAF splice variants, BRAF amplification, neuroblastoma RAS viral oncogene homolog (NRAS) mutations and mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 1/2 (MEK1/2) mutations. Genetic and epigenetic changes reactivate previously blocked mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways, activate alternative signaling pathways, and cause epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Once BRAF inhibitor resistance develops, the tumor microenvironment reverts to a low immunogenic state secondary to the induction of programmed cell death ligand-1. Combining a BRAF inhibitor with a MEK inhibitor delays resistance development and increases duration of response. Multiple other combinations based on known mechanisms of resistance are being investigated. BRAF inhibitor-resistant cells develop a range of ‘escape routes’, so multiple different treatment targets will probably be required to overcome resistance. In the future, it may be possible to personalize combination therapy towards the specific resistance pathway in individual patients.

1 October 2000 in The Journal of Immunology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FMFrédérique Michel
Frédérique Michel
Giorgio ManginoGiorgio Mangino
Giorgio Mangino
GAGérAldine Attal-Bonnefoy
GérAldine Attal-Bonnefoy
LTLoretta Tuosto
Loretta Tuosto
AAAndrés Alcover
Andrés Alcover
OAOreste Acuto
Oreste Acuto
The mechanism through which CD28 costimulation potentiates TCR-driven gene expression is still not clearly defined. Vav-1, an exchange factor for Rho GTPases thought to regulate, mainly through Rac-1, various signaling components leading to cytokine gene expression, is tyrosine phosphorylated upon CD28 engagement. Here, we provide evidence for a key role of Vav-1 in CD28-mediated signaling. Overexpression of Vav-1 in Jurkat cells in combination with CD28 ligation strongly reduced the concentration of staphylococcus enterotoxin E/MHC required for TCR-induced NF-AT activation. Surprisingly, upon Vav-1 overexpression CD28 ligation sufficed to activate NF-AT in the absence of TCR engagement. This effect was not mediated by overexpression of ZAP-70 nor of SLP-76 but necessitated the intracellular tail of CD28, the intactness of the TCR-proximal signaling cascade, the Src-homology domain 2 (SH2) domain of Vav-1, and SLP-76 phosphorylation, an event which was favored by Vav-1 itself. Cells overexpressing Vav-1 formed lamellipodia and microspikes reminiscent of Rac-1 and Cdc42 activation, respectively, for which the SH2 domain of Vav-1 was dispensable. Together, these data suggest that CD28 engagement activates Vav-1 to boost TCR signals through a synergistic cooperation between Vav-1 and SLP-76 and probably via cortical actin changes to facilitate the organization of a signaling zone.

1 August 2012 in Steroids
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PVPaolo De Vito
Paolo De Vito
VBValentina Balducci
Valentina Balducci
SLStefano Leone
Stefano Leone
ZPZulema Percario
Zulema Percario
Giorgio ManginoGiorgio Mangino
Giorgio Mangino
SISandra Incerpi
Sandra Incerpi

22 October 2012 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PRPaola Ruggieri
Paola Ruggieri
Giorgio ManginoGiorgio Mangino
Giorgio Mangino
BFBernard Fioretti
Bernard Fioretti
LCLuigi Catacuzzeno
Luigi Catacuzzeno
RPRosa Puca
Rosa Puca
ACAntonella Calogero
Antonella Calogero
In the present study we evaluated the expression of the intermediate conductance calcium-activated potassium (KCa3.1) channel in human glioblastoma stem-like cells (CSCs) and investigated its role in cell motility. While the KCa3.1 channel is not expressed in neuronal- and glial-derived tissues of healthy individuals, both the KCa3.1 mRNA and protein are present in the glioblastoma tumor population, and are significantly enhanced in CSCs derived from both established cell line U87MG and a primary cell line, FCN9. Consistent with these data, voltage-independent and TRAM-34 sensitive potassium currents imputable to the KCa3.1 channel were recorded in the murine GL261 cell line and several primary human glioblastoma cells lines. Moreover, a significantly higher KCa3.1 current was recorded in U87MG-CD133 positive cells as compared to the U87MG-CD133 negative subpopulation. Further, we found that the tumor cell motility is strongly associated with KCa3.1 channel expression. Blockade of the KCa3.1 channel with the specific inhibitor TRAM-34 has in fact a greater impact on the motility of CSCs (reduction of 75%), which express a high level of KCa3.1 channel, than on the FCN9 parental population (reduction of 32%), where the KCa3.1 channel is expressed at lower level. Similar results were also observed with the CSCs derived from U87MG. Because invasion of surrounding tissues is one of the main causes of treatment failure in glioblastoma, these findings can be relevant for future development of novel cancer therapeutic drugs.