DNA condensation is a ubiquitous phenomenon in biology, yet the physical basis for it has remained elusive. Here, we have explored the mechanism of DNA condensation through the protamine-DNA interaction, and by examining on it the influence of DNA binding drugs. We observed that the DNA condensation is accompanied by B to Ψ-DNA transition as a result of DNA base pair distortions due to protamine binding, bringing about the formation of toroidal structure through coil-globule transition. The binding energetics suggested that electrostatic energy, bending energy and hydration energy must play crucial roles in DNA condensation. EtBr intercalation interferes with the protamine-DNA interaction, challenging the distortion of the DNA helix and separation of DNA base pairs by protamine. Thus, EtBr, by competing directly with protamine, resists the phenomenon of DNA condensation. On the contrary, netropsin impedes the DNA condensation by an allosteric mechanism, by resisting the probable DNA major groove bending by protamine. In summary, we demonstrate that drugs with distinct binding modes use different mechanism to interfere with DNA condensation.

Heterocyclic diamidines are strong DNA minor‐groove binders and have excellent antiparasitic activity. To extend the biological activity of these compounds, a series of arylimidamides (AIAs) analogues, which have better uptake properties in Leishmania and Trypanosoma cruizi than diamidines, was prepared. The binding of the AIAs to DNA was investigated by T_m, fluorescence displacement titration, circular dichroism, DNase I footprinting, biosensor surface plasmon resonance, X‐ray crystallography and molecular modeling. These compounds form 1:1 complexes with AT sequences in the DNA minor groove, and the binding strength varies with substituent size, charge and polarity. These substituent‐dependent structure and properties provide a SAR that can be used to estimate K values for binding to DNA in this series. The structural results and molecular modeling studies provide an explanation for the differences in binding affinities for AIAs.

The insulin–protamine interaction is at the core of the mode of action in many insulin formulations (Zn + insulin + protamine) and to treat diabetes, in which protamine is added to the stable form of hexameric insulin (Zn–insulin). However, due to the unavailability of quantitative data and a high-resolution structure, the binding mechanism of the insulin–protamine complex remains unknown. In this study, it was observed that Zn–insulin experiences destabilization as observed by the loss of secondary structure in circular dichroism (CD), and reduction in thermal stability in melting study, upon protamine binding. In isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC), it was found that the interactions were mostly enthalpically driven. This is in line with the positive ΔCm value (+880 cal mol–1), indicating the role of hydrophilic interactions in the complex formation, with the exposure of hydrophobic residues to the solvent, which was firmly supported by the 8-anilino-1-naphthalene sulfonate (ANS) binding study. The stoichiometry (N) value in ITC suggests the multiple insulin molecules binding to the protamine chain, which is consistent with the picture of the condensation of insulin in the presence of protamine. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) suggested the formation of a heterogeneous Zn–insulin–protamine complex. In fluorescence, Zn–insulin experiences strong Tyr quenching, suggesting that the location of the protamine-binding site is near Tyr, which is also supported by the molecular docking study. Since Tyr is critical in the stabilization of insulin self-assembly, its interaction with protamine may impair insulin’s self-association ability and thermodynamic stability while at the same time promoting its flexible conformation desired for better biological activity.

Introduction: Aluminum salts, although they have been used as adjuvants in many vaccine formulations since 1926, exclusively induce a Th2-biased immune response, thereby limiting their use against intracellular pathogens like Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Methods and Results: Herein, we synthesized amorphous and crystalline forms of aluminum hydroxide nanoparticles (AH nps) of 150– 200 nm size range. Using Bacillus anthracis protective antigen domain 4 (D4) as a model antigen, we demonstrated that both amorphous and crystalline forms of AH nps displayed enhanced antigen D4 uptake by THP1 cells as compared to commercial adjuvant aluminum hydroxide gel (AH gel). In a mouse model, both amorphous and crystalline AH nps triggered an enhanced D4-specific Th2- and Th1-type immune response and conferred superior protection against anthrax spore challenge as compared to AH gel. Physicochemical characterization of crystalline and amorphous AH nps revealed stronger antigen D4 binding and release than AH gel. Conclusion: These results demonstrate that size and crystallinity of AH nps play important roles in mediating enhanced antigen presenting cells (APCs) activation and potentiating a strong antigen-specific immune response, and are critical parameters for the rational design of alum-based Th1-type adjuvant to induce a more balanced antigen-specific immune response.

In biological systems, the unprompted assembly of DNA molecules by cationic ligands into condensed structures is ubiquitous. The ability of ligands to provoke DNA packaging is crucial to the molecular organization and functional control of DNA, yet their underlined physical roles have remained elusive. Here, we have examined the DNA condensation mechanism of four cationic ligands, including their primary DNA-binding modes through extensive biophysical studies. We observed contrasting changes for these ligands binding to poly[dGdC]:poly[dGdC] (GC-DNA) and poly[dAdT]:poly[dAdT] (AT-DNA). Based on a CD spectroscopic study, it was confirmed that only GC-DNA undergoes B- to Ψ-type DNA transformation in the presence of ligands. In the fluorescence displacement assay (FDA), the ability of ligands to displace GC-DNA-bound EtBr follows the order: protamine²¹⁺ > cohex³⁺ > Ni²⁺ > spermine⁴⁺, which indicates that there is no direct correlation between the ligand charge and its ability to displace the drug from the DNA, indicating that GC-DNA condensation is not just influenced by electrostatic interaction but ligand-specific interactions may also have played a crucial role. Furthermore, the detailed ITC-binding studies suggested that DNA-ligand interactions are generally driven by unfavorable enthalpy and favorable entropy. The correlations from various studies insinuate that cationic ligands show major groove binding as one of the preferred binding modes during GC-DNA condensation.