Background: Since the confirmation of the first patient infected with SARS-CoV-2 in Spain in January 2020, the epidemic has grown rapidly, with the greatest impact on the region of Madrid. This article describes the first 2226 adult patients with COVID-19, consecutively admitted to La Paz University Hospital in Madrid. Methods: Our cohort included all patients consecutively hospitalized who had a final outcome (death or discharge) in a 1286-bed hospital of Madrid (Spain) from 25 February (first case admitted) to 19 April 2020. The data were manually entered into an electronic case report form, which was monitored prior to the analysis. Results: We consecutively included 2226 adult patients admitted to the hospital who either died (460) or were discharged (1766). The patients’ median age was 61 years, and 51.8% were women. The most common comorbidity was arterial hypertension (41.3%), and the most common symptom on admission was fever (71.2%). The median time from disease onset to hospital admission was 6 days. The overall mortality was 20.7% and was higher in men (26.6% vs. 15.1%). Seventy-five patients with a final outcome were transferred to the intensive care unit (ICU) (3.4%). Most patients admitted to the ICU were men, and the median age was 64 years. Baseline laboratory values on admission were consistent with an impaired immune-inflammatory profile. Conclusions: We provide a description of the first large cohort of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in Europe. Advanced age, male sex, the presence of comorbidities and abnormal laboratory values were more common among the patients with fatal outcomes.

Objective: This study evaluated maintenance with lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy vs. continuing lopinavir/ritonavir and 2 nucleosides in HIV-infected patients with suppressed HIV replication. Design: Randomized, controlled, open-label, multicenter, pilot clinical trial. Methods: Adult patients were eligible if they had no history of virologic failure while receiving a protease inhibitor, were receiving 2 nucleosides + lopinavir/ritonavir (400/100 mg b.i.d.) for >1 month and had maintained serum HIV RNA 6 months prior to enrollment. Results: Forty-two patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to continue or stop the nucleosides. At baseline there were no significant differences between groups in median CD4 cells/μL (baseline or nadir), pre-HAART (highly active antiretroviral therapy) HIV log₁₀ viremia, or time with HIV RNA <50 copies/mL prior to enrollment. After 48 weeks of follow-up, percentage of patients remaining at <50 HIV RNA copies/mL (intention to treat, M = F) was 81% for the monotherapy group (95% CI: 64% to 98%) vs. 95% for the triple-therapy group (95% CI: 86% to 100%); P = 0.34. Patients in whom monotherapy failed had significantly worse adherence than patients who remained virally suppressed on monotherapy. Monotherapy failures did not show primary resistance mutations in the protease gene and were successfully reinduced with prerandomization nucleosides. Mean change in CD4 cells/μL: +70 (monotherapy) and +8 (triple) (P = 0.27). Mean serum fasting lipids remained stable in both groups. No serious adverse events were observed. Conclusion: Most of the patients maintained with lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy remain with undetectable viral load after 48 weeks. Failures of lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy were not associated with the development of primary resistance mutations in the protease gene and could be successfully reinduced adding back prior nucleosides.

There is evidence showing the importance of reaching immunosuppressant target concentrations as soon as possible. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between tacrolimus trough concentrations within the first week after transplantation and the rate of acute rejection. In this descriptive-analytic study, we included 57 renal transplant patients receiving tacrolimus as the primary immunosuppressive drug. After univariate analysis, donor age, duration of hospital stay, and creatinine clearance (third month) showed significant differences between rejecters and nonrejecters. In addition, mean tacrolimus trough concentrations on day 5, day 7, mean of days 1-7, and mean of days 5-7 were found to be significantly lower in rejecters (P = 0.009, P = 0.012, P = 0.006, and P = 0.035, respectively). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis with tacrolimus trough concentrations measured on days 5 and 7 was able to discriminate between patients with and without acute rejection (P = 0.028 and P = 0.048 after Bonferroni correction). The tacrolimus trough concentration with the best sensitivity-specificity balance was 9.3 ng/mL on day 5 and 8.7 ng/mL on day 7. In the Kaplan-Meier analysis, patients with tacrolimus trough concentrations below 9.3 mg/mL on day 5 showed a lower survival time without acute rejection (P = 0.048 after correction) in comparison with patients with tacrolimus trough concentrations above this concentration. After logistic regression, we obtained a model relating rejection with sex, donor age, and tacrolimus trough concentrations on day 5 (P = 0.004). No significant relationship between tacrolimus trough concentrations and delta creatinine clearance from week 1 to month 3 was obtained. These results confirm that tacrolimus trough concentrations during the first week are an important predictor of acute rejection. Therefore, it is critical to reach target blood concentrations of tacrolimus as soon as possible to improve allograft survival.