Background—: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is associated with a higher risk of neurological events for both the transfemoral and transapical approach than surgical valve replacement. Cerebral magnetic resonance imaging has revealed more new, albeit clinically silent lesions from procedural embolization, yet the main source and predominant procedural step of emboli remain unclear. Methods and Results—: Eighty-three patients underwent transfemoral (Medtronic CoreValve [MCV _TF ], n=32; Edwards Sapien [ES _TF ], n=26) and transapical (ES _TA : n=25) TAVI. Serial transcranial Doppler examinations before, during, and 3 months after TAVI were used to identify high-intensity transient signals (HITS) as a surrogate for microembolization. Procedural HITS were detected in all patients, predominantly during manipulation of the calcified aortic valve while stent valves were being positioned and implanted. The balloon-expandable ES prosthesis caused significantly more HITS (mean [95% CI]) during positioning (ES _TF , 259.9 [184.8–334.9]; ES _TA , 206.1[162.5–249.7]; MCV _TF , 78.5 [25.3–131.6]; P <0.001) and the self-expandable MCV prosthesis during implantation (MCV _TF , 397.1 [302.1–492.2]; ES _TF , 88.2 [70.2–106.3]; ES _TA , 110.7 [82.0–139.3]; P <0.001). Overall, there were no significant differences between transfemoral and transapical TAVI or between the MCV and ES prostheses. No HITS were detected at baseline or 3-month follow-up. There was 1 major procedural stroke that resulted in death and 1 minor procedural stroke with full recovery at 3-month follow-up in the MCV group. Conclusions—: Procedural HITS were detected by transcranial Doppler in all patients. Although no difference was observed between the transfemoral and the transapical approach with the balloon-expandable ES stent valve, transfemoral TAVI with the self-expandable MCV prosthesis resulted in the greatest number of HITS, predominantly during implantation.

Patients with severe infections and especially sepsis have a high in-hospital mortality, but even hospital survivors face long-term sequelae, decreased health-related quality of life, and high risk of death, suggesting a great need for specialized aftercare. However, data regarding a potential benefit of post-discharge rehabilitation in these patients are scarce. In this retrospective matched cohort study the claim data of a large German statutory health care insurer was analyzed. 83,974 hospital survivors having suffered from septic shock, sepsis, and severe infections within the years 2009–2016 were identified using an ICD abstraction strategy closely matched to the current Sepsis-3 definition. Cases were analyzed and compared with their matched pairs to determine their 5-year mortality and the impact of post-discharge rehabilitation. Five years after hospital discharge, mortality of initial hospital survivors were still increased after septic shock (HR_adj 2.03, 95%-CI 1.87 to 2.19; P<0.001), sepsis (HR_adj 1.73, 95%-CI 1.71 to 1.76; P<0.001), and also in survivors of severe infections without organ dysfunction (HR_adj 1.70, 95%-CI 1.65 to 1.74; P<0.001) compared to matched controls without infectious diseases. Strikingly, patients treated in rehabilitation facilities showed a significantly improved 5-year survival after suffering from sepsis or septic shock (HR_adj 0.81, 95%-CI 0.77 to 0.85; P<0.001) as well as severe infections without organ dysfunction (HR_adj 0.81, 95%-CI 0.73 to 0.90; P<0.001) compared to matched patients discharged to home or self-care. Long-term mortality and morbidity of hospital survivors are markedly increased after septic shock, sepsis and severe infections without organ dysfunction, but best 5-year survival was recorded in patients discharged to a rehabilitation facility in all three groups. Thus, our data suggest that specialized aftercare programs may help to improve long-term outcome in these patients and warrants more vigilance in future investigations.

Summary: Surgical aortic valve replacement is the conventional treatment for symptomatic aortic valve stenosis; however, the technique of transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation has recently been developed for older patients at high risk for surgery. We assessed whether this procedure could be safely performed under sedation in 100 patients. Their predicted surgical mortality was 21.6% and mean (SD) age 80 (6.6) years. Sedation was provided by remifentanil infusion (0–0.2 μg.kg ⁻¹ .min ⁻¹ ) and midazolam (1–3 mg), as required. All patients were closely haemodynamically monitored throughout by an anaesthetist and inotropic drugs administered as indicated by invasive monitoring. Sedation alone was required in 83 patients; in 17 patients sedation had to be converted to general anaesthesia, mainly because of interventional complications ( n = 12). All conversions to general anaesthesia occurred after successful valve implantation. Mean (SD) anaesthesia time was 31 (12) min and procedural time 107 (77) min; 30‐day and 1‐year all‐cause mortality were 6% and 13%, respectively. In the majority of patients, transcatheter valve implantation can safely be facilitated by sedation, provided monitoring and drug administration are carried out by an experienced cardiac anaesthetist. You can respond to this article at http://www.anaesthesiacorrespondence.com

Interscalene brachial plexus (ISB) block is often associated with phrenic nerve block and diaphragmatic paresis. The goal of our study was to test if the anterior or the posterior ultrasound guided approach of the ISB is associated with a lower incidence of phrenic nerve blocks and impaired lung function. This was a prospective, randomized and single-blinded study of 84 patients scheduled for elective shoulder surgery who fullfilled the inclusion and exclusion critereria. Patients were randomized in two groups to receive either the anterior (n = 42) or the posterior (n = 42) approach for ISB. Clinical data were recorded. In both groups patients received ISB with a total injection volume of 15 ml of ropivacaine 1 %. Spirometry was conducted at baseline (T0) and 30 min (T30) after accomplishing the block. Changes in spirometrical variables between T0 and T30 were investigated by Wilcoxon signed-rank test for each puncture approach. The temporal difference between the posterior and the anterior puncture approach groups were again analyzed by the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test. The spirometric results showed a significant decrease in vital capacity, forced expiratory volume per second, and maximum nasal inspiratory breathing after the Interscalene brachial plexus block; indicating a phrenic nerve block (p <0.001, Wilcoxon signed-rank). A significant difference in the development of the spirometric parameters between the anterior and the posterior group could not be identified (Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test). Despite the changes in spirometry, no cases of dyspnea were reported. A different site of injection (anterior or posterior) did not show an effect in reducing the cervical block spread of the local anesthetic and the incidence of phrenic nerve blocks during during ultrasound guided Interscalene brachial plexus block. Clinical breathing effects of phrenic nerve blocks are, however, usually well compensated, and subjective dyspnea did not occur in our patients. German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS number 00009908 , registered 26 January 2016).