Adam Adamkowski

Prof. Adam Adamkowski

The Szewalski Institute of Fluid-Flow Machinery, Polish Academy of Sciences, Gdansk, Poland
+1
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

26Years (2001-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 November 2012 in Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Adam AdamkowskiAdam Adamkowski
Adam Adamkowski
Mariusz LewandowskiMariusz Lewandowski
Mariusz Lewandowski
The authors previously described a new method [based on the new discrete vapor cavity model (new DVCM)] for numerical prediction of pressure changes during the water hammer with liquid column separation together with results of preliminary experimental verification of this method. This paper is a continuation of the research and includes results of additional laboratory tests and visualization of the cavitation zones generated during transient flow with liquid column separation. The results of these studies provide a better understanding of the phenomenon. It is shown that the phenomenon can have a distributed nature, which means that gas-vapor zones may be observed not only locally, in the vicinity of the shutoff valve, but may be spread along the pipeline length, and the intensity of this phenomenon decreases with distance from the valve. Laboratory test results were also used for further verification of the new DVCM. This verification shows that agreement between calculated and experimental res...

1 July 2001 in Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Adam AdamkowskiAdam Adamkowski
Adam Adamkowski
The paper presents the results of investigations carried out in connection with a penstock rupture at a small hydropower plant in Poland. The investigations comprised material tests of the ruptured penstock shell, analysis of the stress in the shell of the ruptured penstock section, analysis of hydraulic transients under conditions of failure, and testing of the penstock and gensets after repair. In the case under consideration, excessive water hammer caused by rapid flow cut-off was recognized as the direct cause of the penstock burst. Low strength of the penstock shell because of low quality weld joints and lack of strengthening in places of large stress concentration also contributed to the penstock failure. Results of the case investigation highlight some problems that should be taken into account during the process of design, modernization, and operation of hydropower plants in order to ensure their safe operation.

1 February 2021 in Thin-Walled Structures
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Adam AdamkowskiAdam Adamkowski
Adam Adamkowski
MLMariusz Lewandowski
Mariusz Lewandowski
SLStanisław Lewandowski
Stanisław Lewandowski

9 June 2009 in Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Adam AdamkowskiAdam Adamkowski
Adam Adamkowski
ZKZbigniew Krzemianowski
Zbigniew Krzemianowski
WJWaldemar Janicki
Waldemar Janicki
One of the basic flow rate measurement methods applied in hydropower plants and recommended by the International Standard IEC 60041–1999 and American National Standard ASME PTC 18–2002 is the pressure-time method, generally known as Gibson method. The method consists in determining the flow rate (discharge) by integration of the recorded time course of pressure difference variations between two cross sections of the hydropower plant penstock. The accuracy of measurement depends on numerous factors and, according to the International Standard, generally is confined within the range 1.5–2.3%. Following the classical approach, the pressure-time method applicability is limited to straight cylindrical pipelines with constant diameters. However, the International Standard does not exclude application of this method to more complex geometries, i.e., curved pipeline (with elbows). It is obvious that a curved pipeline causes deformation of the uniform velocity field in pipeline cross sections, which subsequently causes aggravation of the accuracy of the pressure-time method flow rate measurement results. The influence of a curved penstock application on flow rate measurements by means of the considered method is discussed in this paper. The special calculation procedure for the problem solution has been developed. The procedure is based on the FLUENT computational fluid dynamic solver. Computations have been carried out in order to find the so-called equivalent value of the geometric pipe factor F required when using the pressure-time method. An example of application of this method to a complex geometry (two elbows in a penstock) is presented. The systematic uncertainty caused by neglecting the effect of the elbows on velocity field deformation has been estimated.

9 September 2020 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Adam AdamkowskiAdam Adamkowski
Adam Adamkowski
WJWaldemar Janicki
Waldemar Janicki
Mariusz LewandowskiMariusz Lewandowski
Mariusz Lewandowski
This article presents the original procedures for measuring the flow rate using the pressure-time and the volumetric gauging method in the case of performance tests of a reversible hydraulic machine in either turbine or pump modes of operation. Achieving the lowest possible measurement uncertainty was one of the basic conditions during implemented machine tests. It was met using appropriate measuring procedures and high-class measuring equipment. Estimation of the uncertainty for both methods was made on the basis of an analysis consistent with current requirements in this respect. The pressure-time method was supplemented by the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis that allowed reducing the impact of the pipeline complex irregular geometry on the uncertainty of flow measurement. Appropriate modifications of the calculation procedure enabled accurate measurements of flow during the pump mode of operation of the tested machine as well. The volumetric gauging method, thanks to a special procedure used for accurate measurement of the water level in the upper reservoir of the power plant, allowed measuring the discharge through the tested reversible machine with very low uncertainty. The obtained results allowed for a detailed comparison and mutual verification of the methods used to measure the discharge of the tested reversible machine in both modes of its operation. The most possible causes of obtained results are discussed and summarized in the paper. The need for further research was pointed out to explain the differences obtained and their influence on the accuracy of discharge measurement using the pressure-time method in pump operation mode.

1 January 2014 in Procedia Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Adam AdamkowskiAdam Adamkowski
Adam Adamkowski
Mariusz LewandowskiMariusz Lewandowski
Mariusz Lewandowski
The paper presents the results of calculations of the water-hammer course accompanied by the column separation caused by a rapid closure of the butterfly valve. The computational method takes into account the cavitation characteristics of the valve that has been determined on the special laboratory stand in the Szewalski Institute of Fluid-Flow Machinery in Gdansk, Poland. In addition, calculations have been conducted using authors’ own discrete-vapour-cavity-model (the New Single-Zone DVCM). The paper presents also a comparison between these calculation results and the experimental ones obtained at the own laboratory stand for investigation of the water-hammer phenomenon in the pump discharge pipeline. The comparison of the numerical and empirical results is a basis for the verification process and assessment of the computational method that has been developed