Maria Sofia Cattaruzza

Prof. Maria Sofia Cattaruzza

Sapienza University of Rome Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

36Years (1991-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2005 in European Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Sara GandiniSara Gandini
Sara Gandini
FSFrancesco Sera
Francesco Sera
MCMaria Sofia Cattaruzza
Maria Sofia Cattaruzza
PPPaolo Pasquini
Paolo Pasquini
OPOrietta Picconi
Orietta Picconi
CMCarmelo Francesco Melchi
Carmelo Francesco Melchi

1 January 2005 in European Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Sara GandiniSara Gandini
Sara Gandini
FSFrancesco Sera
Francesco Sera
MCMaria Sofia Cattaruzza
Maria Sofia Cattaruzza
PPPaolo Pasquini
Paolo Pasquini
DADamiano Abeni
Damiano Abeni
CMCarmelo Francesco Melchi
Carmelo Francesco Melchi
A systematic meta-analysis of observational studies of melanoma and one of the most important risk factors, the number of naevi, was conducted in order to clarify aspects of the aetiology of this disease. Following a systematic literature search, relative risks (RRs) were extracted from 46 studies published before September 2002. Dose-response random effects models were used to obtain pooled estimates. Sub-group analysis and meta-regression were carried out to explore sources of between-study variation and bias. Sensitivity analyses investigated the reliability of the results and any publication bias. Number of common naevi was confirmed an important risk factor with a substantially increased risk associated with the presence of 101-120 naevi compared with <15 (pooled Relative Risk (RR) = 6.89; 95% Confidential Interval (CI): 4.63, 10.25) as was the number of atypical naevi (RR = 6.36 95%; CI: 3.80, 10.33; for 5 versus 0). The type of study and source of cases and controls were two study characteristics that significantly influenced the estimates. Case-control studies, in particular when the hospital was the source for cases or controls, appeared to present much lower and more precise estimates than cohort studies.

1 September 2005 in European Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Sara GandiniSara Gandini
Sara Gandini
FSFrancesco Sera
Francesco Sera
MCMaria Sofia Cattaruzza
Maria Sofia Cattaruzza
PPPaolo Pasquini
Paolo Pasquini
RZRoberto Zanetti
Roberto Zanetti
CMCarmelo Francesco Melchi
Carmelo Francesco Melchi

1 December 2005 in Endocrine-Related Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Francesco PanzutoFrancesco Panzuto
Francesco Panzuto
SNSilvia Nasoni
Silvia Nasoni
MFMassimo Falconi
Massimo Falconi
VCVito Domenico Corleto
Vito Domenico Corleto
Gabriele CapursoGabriele Capurso
Gabriele Capurso
GFGianfranco Delle Fave
Gianfranco Delle Fave
Since gastro-entero-pancreatic endocrine tumors are rare and heterogeneous diseases, their prognosis and long-term survival are not well known. This study aimed at identifying prognostic factors and assessing long-term survival in gastro-entero-pancreatic endocrine tumors. A total of 156 patients enrolled. Prognostic factors were determined by univariate/multivariate analysis; survival rates were assessed by the Kaplan–Meier method. The tumors were non-functioning in 59.6% of patients, and originated from the pancreas in 42.9%. At diagnosis, 64.3% of patients had metastases. The tumors were well differentiated in 89.6% of patients. Ki67 was >2% in 39.6% of patients. Primary tumor size was >3 cm in 49.6% of cases studied. For the univariate analysis, the negative prognostic factors were: pancreatic origin (rate ratio 4.64, P = 0.0002), poorly differentiated tumor (rate ratio 7.70, P = 0.0001), primary tumor size >3 cm (rate ratio 4.26, P = 0.0009), presence of distant metastases (liver: rate ratio 5.88, P = 0.01; distant extra-hepatic: rate ratio 13.41, P = 0.0008). The pancreatic site, the poor degree of differentiation and the distant metastases were confirmed as negative prognostic factors at multivariate analysis. Overall 5-year survival rate was 77.5%. Survival rates differed according to: primary tumor site (62% for pancreatic vs 89.9% for gastrointestinal tract, P = 0.0001) and size (65.7% for >3 cm vs 88.8% for ≤ 3 cm, P = 0.0003), degree of differentiation (22% for poor vs 86.8% for good, P 2% vs 90.1% for ≤ 2%, P = 0.003), metastases (96.1, 77, 73.3 and 50.1% for absent, local, liver and distant extra-hepatic metastases respectively), age at diagnosis (85.3% for ≤ 50 years vs 70.3% for > 50 years, P = 0.03). Although 64.3% of gastro-entero-pancreatic endocrine tumors present metastases at diagnosis, the 5-year survival rate is 77.5%. Pancreatic site, a poor degree of tumor cell differentiation and distant extra-hepatic metastases are the major negative prognostic factors.

1 February 2005 in European Respiratory Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Marco ConfalonieriMarco Confalonieri
Marco Confalonieri
GGGiancarlo Garuti
Giancarlo Garuti
MCMaria Sofia Cattaruzza
Maria Sofia Cattaruzza
JOJ F Osborn
J F Osborn
MAM Antonelli
M Antonelli
IGItalian noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) study group
Italian noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) study group
Knowing the likelihood of failure of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) in patients with exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) could indicate the best choice between NPPV and endotracheal intubation instituted earlier. For this purpose, two risk charts were designed (at admission and after 2 h of NPPV) that included all relevant measurable clinical prognostic indicators derived from a population representing the patients seen routinely in clinical practice.Risk stratification of NPPV failure was assessed in 1,033 consecutive patients admitted to experienced hospital units, including two intensive care units, six respiratory intermediate care units, and five general wards. NPPV was successful in 797 patients.Patients with a Glasgow Coma Score <11, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) II ≥29, respiratory rate ≥30 breaths·min−1and pH at admission 70%. A pH 90%). The risk charts were validated on an independent group of 145 consecutive COPD patients treated with NPPV due to an acute ventilatory failure episode. To identify patients with a probability of failure >50%, the sensitivity and specificity were 33% and 96.7% on admission and 52.9% and 94.1% after 2 h of NPPV, respectively.The prediction chart, based on data from the current study, can function as a simple tool to predict the risk of failure of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation and thus improve clinical management of patients tailoring medical intervention.

1 May 2005 in Gastroenterology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KTKaspar Truninger
Kaspar Truninger
MMMirco Menigatti
Mirco Menigatti
JLJudith Luz
Judith Luz
ARAnna Russell
Anna Russell
RHRitva Haider
Ritva Haider
GMGiancarlo Marra
Giancarlo Marra