Eliezer Gurarie

Dr. Eliezer Gurarie

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

29Years (1998-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
6 April 2009 in Ecology Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
EGEliezer Gurarie
Eliezer Gurarie
RARussel D. Andrews
Russel D. Andrews
KLKristin L. Laidre
Kristin L. Laidre

23 July 2015 in Journal of Animal Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
EGEliezer Gurarie
Eliezer Gurarie
CBChloe Bracis
Chloe Bracis
MDMaria Delgado
Maria Delgado
TMTrevor D Meckley
Trevor D Meckley
IKIlpo Kojola
Ilpo Kojola
CWC Michael Wagner
C Michael Wagner

1 August 2013 in Ecological Modelling
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JAJames J. Anderson
James J. Anderson
EGEliezer Gurarie
Eliezer Gurarie
CBChloe Bracis
Chloe Bracis
BBBrian J. Burke
Brian J. Burke
KLKristin L. Laidre
Kristin L. Laidre

25 August 2014 in Journal of Animal Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
HBHawthorne L. Beyer
Hawthorne L. Beyer
EGEliezer Gurarie
Eliezer Gurarie
LBLuca Börger
Luca Börger
MPManuela Panzacchi
Manuela Panzacchi
MBMathieu Basille
Mathieu Basille
JMJason Matthiopoulos
Jason Matthiopoulos

6 November 2020 in Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SDSarah C. Davidson
Sarah C. Davidson
GBGil Bohrer
Gil Bohrer
EGEliezer Gurarie
Eliezer Gurarie
SLScott LaPoint
Scott LaPoint
PMPeter J. Mahoney
Peter J. Mahoney
MHMark Hebblewhite
Mark Hebblewhite
Ecological “big data”: Human activities are rapidly altering the natural world. Nowhere is this more evident, perhaps, than in the Arctic, yet this region remains one of the most remote and difficult to study. Researchers have increasingly relied on animal tracking data in these regions to understand individual species' responses, but if we want to understand larger-scale change, we need to integrate our understanding across species. Davidsonet al.introduce an open-source data archive that currently hosts more than 15 million location data points across 96 species and use it to show distinct climate change responses across species. Such ecological “big data” can lead to a wider understanding of change.Science, this issue p.712

15 November 2019 in Movement Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MNMichael J. Noonan
Michael J. Noonan
CFChristen H. Fleming
Christen H. Fleming
TAThomas S. Akre
Thomas S. Akre
JDJonathan Drescher-Lehman
Jonathan Drescher-Lehman
EGEliezer Gurarie
Eliezer Gurarie
JCJustin M. Calabrese
Justin M. Calabrese
Background: Speed and distance traveled provide quantifiable links between behavior and energetics, and are among the metrics most routinely estimated from animal tracking data. Researchers typically sum over the straight-line displacements (SLDs) between sampled locations to quantify distance traveled, while speed is estimated by dividing these displacements by time. Problematically, this approach is highly sensitive to the measurement scale, with biases subject to the sampling frequency, the tortuosity of the animal’s movement, and the amount of measurement error. Compounding the issue of scale-sensitivity, SLD estimates do not come equipped with confidence intervals to quantify their uncertainty.Methods: To overcome the limitations of SLD estimation, we outline a continuous-time speed and distance (CTSD) estimation method. An inherent property of working in continuous-time is the ability to separate the underlying continuous-time movement process from the discrete-time sampling process, making these models less sensitive to the sampling schedule when estimating parameters. The first step of CTSD is to estimate the device’s error parameters to calibrate the measurement error. Once the errors have been calibrated, model selection techniques are employed to identify the best fit continuous-time movement model for the data. A simulation-based approach is then employed to sample from the distribution of trajectories conditional on the data, from which the mean speed estimate and its confidence intervals can be extracted.Results: Using simulated data, we demonstrate how CTSD provides accurate, scale-insensitive estimates with reliable confidence intervals. When applied to empirical GPS data, we found that SLD estimates varied substantially with sampling frequency, whereas CTSD provided relatively consistent estimates, with often dramatic improvements over SLD.Conclusions: The methods described in this study allow for the computationally efficient, scale-insensitive estimation of speed and distance traveled, without biases due to the sampling frequency, the tortuosity of the animal’s movement, or the amount of measurement error. In addition to being robust to the sampling schedule, the point estimates come equipped with confidence intervals, permitting formal statistical inference. All the methods developed in this study are now freely available in the package or the point-and-click web based graphical user interface.