Baiba Gillard

Dr. Baiba Gillard


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

57Years (1970-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
8 April 2021 in Nature Reviews Cardiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
HPHenry Pownall
Henry Pownall
CRCorina Rosales
Corina Rosales
BGBaiba Gillard
Baiba Gillard
AGAntonio M. Gotto
Antonio M. Gotto

1 April 1985 in Analytical Biochemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SLStephan Ladisch
Stephan Ladisch
BGBaiba Gillard
Baiba Gillard

16 March 2017 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KJKelsey E. Jarrett
Kelsey E. Jarrett
CLCiaran M. Lee
Ciaran M. Lee
YYYi-Hsien Yeh
Yi-Hsien Yeh
RHRachel H. Hsu
Rachel H. Hsu
RGRajat Gupta
Rajat Gupta
WLWilliam R. Lagor
William R. Lagor
Germline manipulation using CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing has dramatically accelerated the generation of new mouse models. Nonetheless, many metabolic disease models still depend upon laborious germline targeting, and are further complicated by the need to avoid developmental phenotypes. We sought to address these experimental limitations by generating somatic mutations in the adult liver using CRISPR/Cas9, as a new strategy to model metabolic disorders. As proof-of-principle, we targeted the low-density lipoprotein receptor (Ldlr), which when deleted, leads to severe hypercholesterolemia and atherosclerosis. Here we show that hepatic disruption of Ldlr with AAV-CRISPR results in severe hypercholesterolemia and atherosclerosis. We further demonstrate that co-disruption of Apob, whose germline loss is embryonically lethal, completely prevented disease through compensatory inhibition of hepatic LDL production. This new concept of metabolic disease modeling by somatic genome editing could be applied to many other systemic as well as liver-restricted disorders which are difficult to study by germline manipulation.

1 September 1998 in Glycobiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BGBaiba Gillard
Baiba Gillard
RCRhonda G. Clement
Rhonda G. Clement
DMDonald M. Marcus
Donald M. Marcus
There are several pathways for the incorporation of sugars into glycosphingolipids (GSL). Sugars can be added to ceramide that contains sphinganine (dihydrosphingosine) synthesized de novo (pathway 1), to ceramide synthesized from sphingoid bases produced by hydrolysis of sphingolipids (pathway 2), and into GSL recycling from the endosomal pathway through the Golgi (pathway 3). We reported previously the surprising observation that SW13 cells, a human adrenal carcinoma cell line, synthesize most of their GSL in pathway 2. We now present data on the synthesis of GSL in four additional cell lines. Approximately 90% of sugar incorporation took place in pathway 2, and 10% or less in pathway 1, in human foreskin fibroblasts and NB41A3 neuroblastoma cells. In contrast, approximately 50–90% of sugar incorporation took place in pathway 1 in C2C12 myoblasts. The C2C12 cells divide more rapidly and synthesize 10–14 times as much GSL as the other three cell lines. In C6 glioma cells, ~30% of sugar incorporation occurred in pathway 1 and 60% in pathway 2. There was no relation between the utilization of pathways for GSL and sphingomyelin synthesis in foreskin fibroblasts and C2C12 cells. In both cells pathways 1 and 2 each accounted for 50% of incorporation of choline into sphingomyelin. In five of the six cell lines that we have studied, most GSL synthesis takes place in pathway 2. We suggest that when the need for synthesis is relatively low, as in slowly dividing cells, GSL are synthesized predominantly from sphingoid bases salvaged from the hydrolytic pathway. When cells are dividing more rapidly, the need for increased synthesis is met by upregulating the de novo pathway.

1 December 1984 in Journal of Clinical Investigation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SLS Ladisch
S Ladisch
LUL Ulsh
L Ulsh
BGBaiba Gillard
Baiba Gillard
CWC Wong
C Wong
Gangliosides are potent inhibitors of lymphoproliferative responses. Selectively greater inhibitory effects of gangliosides on antigen-induced (vs. mitogen-induced) proliferation have been documented; e.g., 50 nmol of highly purified bovine brain gangliosides (BBG)/ml caused greater than or equal to 87% inhibition of proliferative responses of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) to three soluble specific antigens (Candida, streptokinase-streptodornase, and tetanus toxoid) vs. less than or equal to 37% inhibition of responses to three nonspecific mitogens (phytohemagglutinin, concanavalin A, and pokeweed mitogen). The possibility that BBG interfere with adherent monocyte accessory function, upon which responses to soluble specific antigens are strictly dependent, was therefore considered. PBMC were separated into the adherent and nonadherent subpopulations, exposed to BBG, recombined, and their proliferative responses were measured. Unseparated PBMC preincubated for 48-72 h with 100 nmol BBG/ml and then washed to remove unbound BBG exhibited 73-76% inhibition of subsequent antigen-induced lymphoproliferation. Separate pretreatment of both adherent and nonadherent cell subpopulations in BBG under the same conditions resulted in similar (72-82%) inhibition, which was reproduced by preincubation of only the adherent cells in BBG. Preincubation of only the nonadherent cells in BBG was not inhibitory. Inhibition (a) was independent of whether gangliosides were added in solution or incorporated into liposomes, (b) was abrogated by adding untreated monocytes to cultures containing adherent cells that were preexposed to BBG (excluding the possibility that BBG was inducing suppression mediated by adherent cells), and (c) was reversible by further incubation of BBG-pretreated adherent cells in control medium. Together, these results delineate a mechanism by which gangliosides modulate lymphoproliferative responses--direct, noncytotoxic, and ultimately reversible inhibition of the accessory function of adherent monocytes.

1 January 1972 in The Journal of Organic Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AHAlfred G. Hortmann
Alfred G. Hortmann
DRDavid A. Robertson
David A. Robertson
BGBaiba Gillard
Baiba Gillard