Jagdish Paithankar

Dr. Jagdish Paithankar


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2021 in Chemosphere
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JPJagdish Paithankar
Jagdish Paithankar
SSSanjay Saini
Sanjay Saini
SDShiwangi Dwivedi
Shiwangi Dwivedi
ASAnurag Sharma
Anurag Sharma
DCDebapratim Kar Chowdhuri
Debapratim Kar Chowdhuri

3 April 2024 in Antioxidants & Redox Signaling
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LDLeonard Clinton Dsouza
Leonard Clinton Dsouza
JPJagdish Paithankar
Jagdish Paithankar
HSHelga Stopper
Helga Stopper
Ashutosh PandeyAshutosh Pandey
Ashutosh Pandey
ASAnurag Sharma
Anurag Sharma
Significance: Reactive oxygen species (ROS), the reactive oxygen-carrying chemicals moieties, act as pleiotropic signal transducers to maintain various biological processes/functions, including immune response. Increased ROS production leads to oxidative stress, which is implicated in xenobiotic-induced adverse effects. Understanding the immunoregulatory mechanisms and immunotoxicity is of interest to developing therapeutics against xenobiotic insults. Recent Advances: While developmental studies have established the essential roles of ROS in the establishment and proper functioning of the immune system, toxicological studies have demonstrated high ROS generation as one of the potential mechanisms of immunotoxicity induced by environmental chemicals, including heavy metals, pesticides, aromatic hydrocarbons (benzene and derivatives), plastics, and nanoparticles. Mitochondrial electron transport and various signaling components, including NADH oxidase, toll-like receptors (TLRs), NF-κB, JNK, NRF2, p53, and STAT3, are involved in xenobiotic-induced ROS generation and immunotoxicity. Critical Issues: With many studies demonstrating the role of ROS and oxidative stress in xenobiotic-induced immunotoxicity, rigorous and orthogonal approaches are needed to achieve in-depth and precise understanding. The association of xenobiotic-induced immunotoxicity with disease susceptibility and progression needs more data acquisition. Furthermore, the general methodology needs to be possibly replaced with high-throughput precise techniques. Future Directions: The progression of xenobiotic-induced immunotoxicity into disease manifestation is not well documented. Immunotoxicological studies about the combination of xenobiotics, age-related sensitivity, and their involvement in human disease incidence and pathogenesis are warranted. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 40, 691–714.

20 December 2016 in International Journal of Radiation Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JPJagdish Paithankar
Jagdish Paithankar
KDK. Deeksha
K. Deeksha
RPRajashekhar K. Patil
Rajashekhar K. Patil
Purpose: Insects are known to have higher levels of radiation tolerance than mammals. The fruit fly Drosophila provides opportunities for genetic analysis of radiation tolerance in insects. A knowledge of stage-specific sensitivity is required to understand the mechanisms and test the existing hypothesis of insect radiation tolerance. Materials and methods: Drosophila melanogaster were irradiated using gamma rays at different life stages. Irradiation doses were chosen to start from 100–2200 Gy with increments of 100 Gy, with a dose rate of 12.5 and 25 Gy/min. The threshold of mortality, LD50 and LD100 1 h post-irradiation was recorded for larvae and adults and 24 h post-irradiation for eggs and after 2–3 days for early and late pupae. Total antioxidant capacity for all the life stages was measured using the phosphomolybdenum method. Results: Twenty-four hours post-irradiation, 100% mortality was recorded for eggs at 1000 Gy. One hour post irradiation 100% mortality was recorded at 1300 Gy for first instar larvae, 1700 Gy for second instar larvae, 1900 Gy for feeding third instar larvae and 2200 Gy for non-feeding third instar larvae. Post-irradiation complete failure of emergence (100% mortality) was observed at 130 Gy for early pupae and 1500 Gy for late pupae; 100% mortality was observed at 1500 Gy for adults. The values of LD50 were recorded as 452 Gy for eggs, 1049 Gy for first instar larvae, 1350 Gy for second instar larvae, 1265 Gy for feeding third instar larvae, 1590 Gy for non-feeding third instar larvae, 50 Gy for early pupae, 969 Gy for late pupae, 1228 Gy for adult males and 1250 Gy for adult females. Conclusions: Early pupae were found to be prone to radiation, whereas the non-feeding third instar larvae were most resistant among all stages. The chromosome number being constant and total antioxidant capacity being nearly constant in all stages, we suggest that high rate of cell division during early pupae makes this stage sensitive to radiation.

1 February 2022 in Chemosphere
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JPJagdish Paithankar
Jagdish Paithankar
SKSharanya Kushalan
Sharanya Kushalan
NSNijil S
Nijil S
SHSmitha Hegde
Smitha Hegde
Sudarshan KiniSudarshan Kini
Sudarshan Kini
ASAnurag Sharma
Anurag Sharma

16 April 2018 in International Journal of Radiation Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JPJagdish Paithankar
Jagdish Paithankar
SRShamprasad Varija Varija Raghu
Shamprasad Varija Varija Raghu
RPRajashekhar K. Patil
Rajashekhar K. Patil
Purpose: During development, various life stages of Drosophila melanogaster (D. melanogaster) show different levels of resistance to gamma irradiation, with the early pupal stage being the most radiation sensitive. This provides us an opportunity to explore the biochemical basis of such variations. The present study was carried out to understand the mechanisms underlying radiation resistance during life stages of D. melanogaster. Materials and methods: Homogenates from all the life stages of D. melanogaster were prepared at stipulated age. These homogenates were used for the determination of (1) enzymatic antioxidants: superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase, D. melanogaster glutathione peroxidase (DmGPx), and glutathione S-transferase (GST); (2) reducing non-enzymatic antioxidants: total antioxidant capacity (TAC), reduced glutathione (GSH) and non-reducing non-enzymatic antioxidant trehalose; and (3) levels of protein carbonyl (PC) content. Age-dependent changes in radiation resistance and associated biochemical changes were also studied in young (2 d) and old (20 and 30 d) flies. Results: TAC and GSH were found high in the early pupal stage, whereas catalase and DmGPx were found to increase in the early pupal stage. The non-feeding third instar (NFTI) larvae were found to have high levels of SOD and GST, besides NFTI larvae showed high levels of trehalose. A remarkable decrease was observed in radiation resistance and trehalose levels during the early pupal stage. The PC level was the highest during early pupal stage and was the lowest in NFTI larvae. Older flies showed high level of PC compared with young flies. Conclusion: In vitro increments in trehalose concentration correspond to reduced formation of PCs, suggesting a protective role of trehalose against free radicals. A strong correlation between levels of trehalose and PC formation suggests amelioration of proteome damage due to ionizing radiation (IR). Stages with high trehalose levels showed protected proteome and high radiation resistance, suggesting a significant role for this disaccharide in radiation resistance.

15 February 2020 in Molecular Biology Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JPJagdish Paithankar
Jagdish Paithankar
AKAvinash Kundadka Kudva
Avinash Kundadka Kudva
SRShamprasad Varija Varija Raghu
Shamprasad Varija Varija Raghu
RPRajashekhar K. Patil
Rajashekhar K. Patil