There are still approximately 500 million cases of malaria and 1 million deaths from malaria each year. Yet recently, malaria incidence has been dramatically reduced in some parts of Africa by increasing deployment of anti-mosquito measures and new artemisinin-containing treatments, prompting renewed calls for global eradication. However, treatment and mosquito control currently depend on too few compounds and thus are vulnerable to the emergence of compound-resistant parasites and mosquitoes. As discussed in this Review, new drugs, vaccines, and insecticides, as well as improved surveillance methods, are research priorities. Insights into parasite biology, human immunity, and vector behavior will guide efforts to translate parasite and mosquito genome sequences into novel interventions.
There is an urgent need for new drugs to treat malaria, with broad therapeutic potential and novel modes of action, to widen the scope of treatment and to overcome emerging drug resistance. Here we describe the discovery of DDD107498, a compound with a potent and novel spectrum of antimalarial activity against multiple life-cycle stages of the Plasmodium parasite, with good pharmacokinetic properties and an acceptable safety profile. DDD107498 demonstrates potential to address a variety of clinical needs, including single-dose treatment, transmission blocking and chemoprotection. DDD107498 was developed from a screening programme against blood-stage malaria parasites; its molecular target has been identified as translation elongation factor 2 (eEF2), which is responsible for the GTP-dependent translocation of the ribosome along messenger RNA, and is essential for protein synthesis. This discovery of eEF2 as a viable antimalarial drug target opens up new possibilities for drug discovery.
THE lethal form of human malaria caused by Plasmodium falciparum is virtually uncontrollable in many areas because of the development of drug resistance, in particular chloroquine resistance (CQR). CQR is biologically similar to the multiple drug resistance phenotype (MDR) of mammalian tumour cells, as both involve expulsion of drug from the cell and both can be reversed by calcium channel antagonists1. A homologue (pfmdr1) of the mammalian multidrug resistance gene has been implicated in CQR because it is amplified in some CQR isolates of P. falciparum2,3 as is an mdr gene in MDR tumour cells4. We show here that the complete sequences of pfmdr1 genes from 2 CQ sensitive (CQS) P. falciparum isolates are identical. In 5 CQR isolates, 14 key nucleotide differences resulted in amino acid substitutions. On the basis of these substitutions, we have correctly predicted the CQS/CQR status of a further 34 out of 36 isolates. This is a paradox as CQR arises much less frequently than would be predicted if single point mutations were sufficient. We conclude that a mutated pfmdr1 gene is one of at least two mutated genes required for CQR.
Chloroquine-resistant Plasmodium falciparum accumulate significantly less chloroquine than susceptible parasites, and this is thought to be the basis of their resistance. However, the reason for the lower accumulation of chloroquine was unknown. The resistant parasite has now been found to release chloroquine 40 to 50 times more rapidly than the susceptible parasite, although their initial rates of chloroquine accumulation are the same. Verapamil and two other calcium channel blockers, as well as vinblastine and daunomycin, each slowed the release and increased the accumulation of chloroquine by resistant (but not susceptible) Plasmodium falciparum . These results suggest that a higher rate of chloroquine release explains the lower chloroquine accumulation, and thus the resistance observed in resistant Plasmodium falciparum .
1 January 1996 in The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
The therapy of Plasmodium falciparum malaria continues to be a problem in many parts of Southeast Asia because of multidrug resistance to nearly all existing antimalarial drugs. Atovaquone is a novel hydroxynaphthoquinone with broad spectrum anti-protozoal activity. We recently evaluated the antimalarial activity of atovaquone in a series of dose-ranging studies in 317 patients with malaria at the Bangkok Hospital for Tropical Diseases. Originally, the drug was administered alone. Using atovaquone alone resulted in satisfactory, initial clinical responses in all patients; the mean parasite and fever clearance times were 62 and 53 hr, respectively. However, irrespective of the duration of therapy, overall cure rates were approximately 67%. In vitro sensitivity studies on parasites taken from patients prior to treatment and at the time of recrudescence showed a marked decrease in susceptibility to atovaquone in the recrudescent parasites. To improve cure rates, atovaquone was administered in combination with other drugs with antimalarial activity. Proguanil and tetracycline were chosen due to laboratory evidence of potentiation; doxycycline was selected because it has a longer half-life than tetracycline. Although pyrimethamine did not show laboratory evidence of potentiation with atovaquone, it was chosen as an alternative inhibitor of dihydrofolic acid reductase with a longer half-life than proguanil. The clinical studies with these drug combinations confirmed the laboratory results with marked improvement in cure rates for proguanil, tetracycline, and doxycycline; pyrimethamine showed only minimal improvement. Proguanil was subsequently selected as the preferred drug partner because of its long record of safety and the ability to use the drug in pregnant women and children. Of the 104 patients with falciparum malaria treated with atovaquone plus proguanil for 3–7 days, 101 were cured and had virtually no adverse side effects. The combination of atovaquone and proguanil also was effective in eliminating erythrocytic forms of P. vivax, but parasitemia recurred in most patients.
1 September 2005 in The Journal of Infectious Diseases