Objectives: Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the standard therapy for patients with intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study aimed to determine whether combination therapy with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and TACE was superior to TACE monotherapy for intermediate-stage HCC and identify cases in which this technique was the most effective. Materials and methods: We selected patients with intermediate HCC who met the following eligibility criteria: (1) ≥ 20 years of age, (2) receiving initial therapy, (3) ≤7 tumors, and (4) maximum tumor diameter <5 cm. We performed propensity score matching (PSM) using potential confounding factors. We retrospectively compared the cumulative overall survival rate and recurrence-free survival rate between the TACE + RFA and TACE groups. Additionally, a sub-group analysis was performed for preoperative factors. Results: Among the 103 patients, 92 were selected using PSM. The cumulative overall survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years for the TACE + RFA group were 97.4%, 70.4%, and 60.4%, respectively, which were significantly higher than those for the TACE group (92.7%, 55.7%, and 22.8%, respectively, p = .045). The recurrence-free survival rates at 0.5, 1, and 2 years for the TACE + RFA group were 80.0%, 58.6%, and 33.3%, respectively, which were significantly higher than those for the TACE group (34.5%, 8.8%, and 2.9%, respectively, p < .01). For the sub-group with α-fetoprotein (AFP) <100 ng/mL, the TACE + RFA group demonstrated a significantly improved prognosis than the TACE group (p = .036). Conclusions: The addition of RFA to TACE improved cumulative overall and recurrence-free survival in patients with intermediate-stage HCC, especially in patients with AFP <100.

Although sarcopenia is characterized by a loss of muscle strength and skeletal muscle mass, few studies have evaluated the effect of muscle strength on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. We evaluated the impact of sarcopenia-related factors (grip strength (GS) and the skeletal muscle index (SMI)) on the survival among lenvatinib-treated unresectable HCC (u-HCC) patients. This single-center cohort study was conducted at a university hospital. The study population included 63 lenvatinib-treated u-HCC patients managed between April 2018 and April 2020. A decreased GS and decreased SMI were found in 21 (33.3%) and 22 (34.9%) patients, respectively. The overall survival (OS) of the normal GS group was significantly higher than that of the decreased GS group, while that of the normal and decreased SMI groups did not differ markedly. There were no significant differences in the progression-free survival between the normal GS and decreased GS groups or the normal SMI and decreased SMI groups. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards model showed that modified albumin-bilirubin-grade (mALBI) 2b (hazard ratio (HR) 4.39) and a decreased GS (HR 3.55) were independently associated with an increased risk of poor prognosis. In addition to the hepatic functional reserve, a decreased GS was a poor prognostic factor in lenvatinib-treated u-HCC patients.

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is the standard treatment for small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), specifically for tumors <3 cm in size and numbering fewer than three, excluding surgical candidates. Microwave ablation (MWA) is an innovative approach believed to have theoretical benefits over RFA; however, these advantages are yet to be empirically verified. Therefore, we evaluated and compared the effectiveness of MWA and RFA in managing HCC tumors up to 4 cm in size. In this multicenter randomized controlled trial conducted across five centers in Japan, eligible participants had up to 4 tumors, each up to 4 cm in size, and were not considered for surgery. Patients were randomly assigned to undergo MWA or RFA. The primary outcome was the rate of local tumor progression (LTP), whereas secondary outcomes included overall survival (OS) and intra- and extrahepatic recurrence-free survival (RFS) at the end of the 2-year follow up. In total, 240 participants were screened from July 12, 2018, to December 7, 2021. Four participants were excluded: three did not meet inclusion criteria, and one died from an unknown cause during treatment. Consequently, 119 (130 lesions) and 117 (136 lesions) participants were treated with MWA and RFA, respectively. The proportion of lesions with LTP at the 2-year follow up was significantly lower in the MWA group (20 [16.4%] lesions) than in the RFA group (38 [30.4%] lesions) (risk ratio, 0.54; p = 0.007). OS and both intra- and extrahepatic RFS did not significantly differ between groups. MWA is more effective than RFA in reducing local tumor progression for HCC tumors up to 4 cm. However, no differences were observed in OS and RFS. While some randomized control trials (RCTs) have compared the efficacy of microwave ablation (MWA) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the superiority of MWA over RFA remains unverified despite its theoretical benefit. This study is the first to demonstrate the utility of MWA over single-needle RFA for patients with HCC, with a significant difference between the two groups in the proportion of lesions with local tumor progression after a 2-year follow up. Moreover, the two techniques were safe, with only two severe complications reported in the entire study cohort. Given that an RCT differs slightly from daily clinical situations, practical and anatomical criteria for selecting the optimal technique on a lesion-by-lesion basis are required.

There is limited information regarding the oncological benefits of microwave ablation using Thermosphere^TM technology for hepatocellular carcinoma. This study compared the overall survival and recurrence-free survival outcomes among patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after microwave ablation using Thermosphere^TM technology and after radiofrequency ablation. Between December 2017 and August 2020, 410 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (a single lesion that was ≤5 cm or ≤3 lesions that were ≤3 cm) underwent ablation at our institution. Propensity score matching identified 150 matched pairs of patients with well-balanced characteristics. The microwave ablation and radiofrequency ablation groups had similar overall survival rates at 1 year (99.3% vs. 98.2%) and at 2 years (88.4% vs. 87.5%) (p = 0.728), as well as similar recurrence-free survival rates at 1 year (81.1% vs. 76.2%) and at 2 years (60.5% vs. 62.1%) (p = 0.492). However, the microwave ablation group had a significantly lower mean number of total insertions (1.22 ± 0.49 vs. 1.59 ± 0.94; p < 0.0001). This retrospective study revealed no significant differences in the overall survival and recurrence-free survival outcomes after microwave ablation or radiofrequency ablation. However, we recommend microwave ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma tumors with a diameter of >2 cm based on the lower number of insertions.

Background: Rifaximin is commonly used for hepatic encephalopathy (HE). However, the effects of long-term treatment for Japanese people are limited. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the effects and safety of long-term treatment with rifaximin on HE. Methods: A total of 215 patients with cirrhosis administered with rifaximin developed overt or covert HE, which was diagnosed by an attending physician for >12 months. Laboratory data were extracted at pretreatment and 3, 6, and 12 months after rifaximin administration. The long-term effect of rifaximin was evaluated, and the incidence of overt HE during 12 months and adverse events was extracted. Results: Ammonia levels were significantly improved after 3 months of rifaximin administration and were continued until 12 months. There were no serious adverse events after rifaximin administration. The number of overt HE incidents was 9, 14, and 27 patients within 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. Liver enzymes, renal function, and electrolytes did not change after rifaximin administration. Prothrombin activity is a significant risk factor for the occurrence of overt HE. The serum albumin, prothrombin activity, and albumin–bilirubin (ALBI) scores were statistically improved after 3 and 6 months of rifaximin administration. Moreover, the same results were obtained in patients with Child–Pugh C. Conclusions: The long-term rifaximin treatment was effective and safe for patients with HE, including Child–Pugh C.