KIR2DS5 gene encodes an activating natural killer cell receptor whose ligand is not known. It was recently reported to affect the outcome of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. In our studies on KIR2DS5 gene associations with human diseases, we compared the frequencies of this gene in patients and relevant controls. Typing for KIR2DS5 gene was performed by either individual or multiplex polymerase chain reactions which, when compared in the same samples, gave concordant results. We noted an apparently protective effect of KIR2DS5 gene presence in several clinical conditions, but not in others. Namely, this effect was observed in ankylosing spondylitis (p = 0.003, odds ratio [OR] = 0.47, confidence interval [CI] = 0.28–0.79), endometriosis (p = 0.03, OR = 0.25, CI = 0.07–0.82) and acute rejection of kidney graft (p = 0.0056, OR = 0.44, CI = 0.24–0.80), but not in non-small-cell lung carcinoma, rheumatoid arthritis, spontaneous abortion, or leukemia (all p>0.05). In addition, the simultaneous presence of KIR2DS5 gene and HLA-C C1 allotype exhibited an even stronger protective effect on ankylosing spondylitis (p = 0.0003, OR = 0.35, CI = 0.19–0.65), whereas a lack of KIR2DS5 and the presence of the HLA-C C2 allotype was associated with ankylosing spondylitis (p = 0.0017, OR = 1.92, CI = 1.28–2.89), whereas a lack of KIR2DS5 and presence of C1 allotype was associated with rheumatoid arthritis (p = 0.005, OR = 1.47, CI = 1.13–1.92). The presence of both KIR2DS5 and C1 seemed to protect from acute kidney graft rejection (p = 0.017, OR = 0.47, CI = 0.25–0.89), whereas lack of KIR2DS5 and presence of C2 seemed to favor rejection (p = 0.0015, OR = 2.13, CI = 1.34–3.37). Our results suggest that KIR2DS5 may protect from endometriosis, ankylosing spondylitis, and acute rejection of kidney graft.

Rare polyagglutinable NOR erythrocytes contain three unique globoside (Gb4Cer) derivatives, NOR1, NOR_int, and NOR2, in which Gal(α1–4), GalNAc(β1–3)Gal(α1–4), and Gal(α1–4)GalNAc(β1–3)Gal(α1–4), respectively, are linked to the terminal GalNAc residue of Gb4Cer. NOR1 and NOR2, which both terminate with a Gal(α1–4)GalNAc- sequence, react with anti-NOR antibodies commonly present in human sera. While searching for an enzyme responsible for the biosynthesis of Gal(α1–4)GalNAc, we identified a mutation in the A4GALT gene encoding Gb3/CD77 synthase (α1,4-galactosyltransferase). Fourteen NOR-positive donors were heterozygous for the C>G mutation at position 631 of the open reading frame of the A4GALT gene, whereas 495 NOR-negative donors were homozygous for C at this position. The enzyme encoded by the mutated gene contains glutamic acid instead of glutamine at position 211 (substitution Q211E). To determine whether this mutation could change the enzyme specificity, we transfected a teratocarcinoma cell line (2102Ep) with vectors encoding the consensus Gb3/CD77 synthase and Gb3/CD77 synthase with Glu at position 211. The cellular glycolipids produced by these cells were analyzed by flow cytometry, high-performance thin-layer chromatography, enzymatic degradation, and MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Cells transfected with either vector expressed the P1 blood group antigen, which was absent from untransfected cells. Cells transfected with the vector encoding the Gb3/CD77 synthase with Glu at position 211 expressed both P1 and NOR antigens. Collectively, these results suggest that the C631G mutation alters the acceptor specificity of Gb3/CD77 synthase, rendering it able to catalyze synthesis of the Gal(α1–4)Gal and Gal(α1–4)GalNAc moieties.

Genes control biological processes such as muscle production of energy, mitochondria biogenesis, bone formation, erythropoiesis, angiogenesis, vasodilation, neurogenesis, etc. DNA profiling for athletes reveals genetic variations that may be associated with endurance ability, muscle performance and power exercise, tendon susceptibility to injuries and psychological aptitude. Already, over 200 genes relating to physical performance have been identified by several research groups. Athletes’ genotyping is developing as a tool for the formulation of personalized training and nutritional programmes to optimize sport training as well as for the prediction of exercise-related injuries. On the other hand, development of molecular technology and gene therapy creates a risk of non-therapeutic use of cells, genes and genetic elements to improve athletic performance. Therefore, the World Anti-Doping Agency decided to include prohibition of gene doping within their World Anti-Doping Code in 2003. In this review article, we will provide a current overview of genes for use in athletes’ genotyping and gene doping possibilities, including their development and detection techniques.