David Lavallee

Prof. David Lavallee

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

31Years (1996-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
16 May 2012 in International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SPSunghee Park
Sunghee Park
DLDavid Lavallee
David Lavallee
DTDavid Tod
David Tod
The purpose of this study was to provide a systematic review of studies on athletes' career transition out of sport from 1968 until the end of 2010. A total of 126 studies were evaluated and reported in three sections: sample characteristics, research designs and correlates of athletes' career transition adjustment. Samples ranged from 1 to 1617. Investigators examined a wide range of competitive levels, both genders and various sports. Researchers have used qualitative (44%), quantitative (44%), and mixed-model (12%) designs. Variables correlated to athletes' career transition adjustment were categorized into factors related to career transition (e.g., self-identity) and available resources during the career transition process (e.g., social support). The discussion focuses on the current status of the study area, limitations in its knowledge, suggested practical implications (e.g., providing proactive support) and future research directions (e.g., examining athletes' retirement decision-making process).

1 January 2004 in Psychology of Sport and Exercise
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PWP. Wylleman
P. Wylleman
DAD. Alfermann
D. Alfermann
DLDavid Lavallee
David Lavallee

1 June 2007 in The Sport Psychologist
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KGKate Goodger
Kate Goodger
TGTrish Gorely
Trish Gorely
DLDavid Lavallee
David Lavallee
CHChris Harwood
Chris Harwood
The purpose of the present review was to provide an up-to-date summary of the burnout-in-sport literature. The last published reviews were in 1989 (Fender) and 1990 (Dale & Weinberg). In order to appreciate the status of current knowledge and understanding and to identify potential future directions, the authors conducted a synthesis of published work using a systematic-review methodology. Findings comprised 3 sections: sample characteristics, correlates, and research designs and data collection. A total of 58 published studies were assessed, most of which focused on athletes (n = 27) and coaches (n = 23). Correlates were grouped into psychological, demographic, and situational factors and were summarized as positively, negatively, indeterminate, and nonassociated with burnout. Self-report measures and cross-sectional designs have dominated research. The authors conclude by summarizing the key findings in the literature and highlighting the gaps that could be filled by future research.

20 June 2015 in Sports Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TRTim Rees
Tim Rees
AHAlex Haslam
Alex Haslam
PCPete Coffee
Pete Coffee
DLDavid Lavallee
David Lavallee

5 November 2013 in International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DSDaragh Sheridan
Daragh Sheridan
PCPete Coffee
Pete Coffee
DLDavid Lavallee
David Lavallee

29 January 2010 in Journal of Applied Sport Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RKRichard Keegan
Richard Keegan
CSChristopher Spray
Christopher Spray
CHChris Harwood
Chris Harwood
DLDavid Lavallee
David Lavallee
This study qualitatively examined the motivationally relevant behaviors of key social agents in specializing sport participants. Seventy-nine participants (9–18 years old) from 26 sports participated in semi-structured focus groups investigating how coaches, parents, and peers may influence motivation. Using a critical-realist perspective, an inductive content analysis indicated that specializing athletes perceived a multitude of motivationally relevant social cues. Coaches’ and parents’ influences were related to their specific roles: instruction/assessment for coaches, support-and-facilitation for parents. Peers influenced motivation through competitive behaviors, collaborative behaviors, evaluative communications, and through their social relationships. The results help to delineate different roles for social agents in influencing athletes’ motivation.