The increase in production and consumption of goods has generated a surplus of waste, which destination is commonly the landfilling sites. This represents a major bottleneck in the production chain and creates new challenges for sustainable development. Due to the environmental and economic benefits, the use of renewable and ecological fuels derived from waste has received global attention. Plasma is one of the techniques that enable achieving renewable energy from solid residues, contributing to landfill avoidance and resource reutilization in line with the circular economy principles and supporting United Nations Sustainable Development Goals 7 (affordable and clean energy), 12 (responsible consumption and production), and 13 (climate action). This article presents a review and analysis of literature related to the use of plasma gasification of solid waste as a method of waste recovery. This article portrays the efforts that have been made in this direction and the barriers to the dissemination of technology for commercial applications. The focus of this article comprises (a) extracting valuable aspects from various studies, including laboratory and field studies, (b) summarizing the work done so far, and (c) compiling studies and findings on plasma gasifiers and recent developments.

Solar stills are used in distant and arid areas to convert brackish or salty water into potable water fit for human use in a simple, affordable, and effective manner. Even when PCM materials are used, typical solar systems still have minimal production per day. In this study, experimental tests were carried out in order to increase the performance of a single-slope solar still combined with PCM material (paraffin wax) and a solar-powered electric heater. Two identical single-slope solar stills were designed, fabricated, and tested under the same climatic conditions during the summer and spring seasons of 2021 in Al-Arish, Egypt. The first is a conventional solar still (CVSS), and the other is also a conventional still but with PCM and an electric heater (CVSSWPCM). Several parameters were measured during the experiments, including sun intensity, meteorological aspects, cumulative freshwater production, average glass, and water temperatures and PCM temperature. The improved solar still was evaluated at different operating temperatures and was compared to the conventional traditional one. There were four cases studied: one case without a heater (paraffin wax only) and three other cases with a heater operating at 58 °C, 60 °C, and 65 °C, respectively. The experimental results revealed that activating the heater inside the paraffin wax increased daily production (i) in the spring by 2.38, 2.66, and 3.1 times and (ii) and in the summer by 2.2, 2.39, and 2.67 times at the three above-mentioned temperatures respectively (when compared to the traditional still). In addition, the maximum rate of daily freshwater production was achieved at paraffin wax temperature of 65 °C in both spring and summer (Case 5). Finally, the economic evaluation of the modified solar still was carried out according to cost per litre. The modified solar still with a heater operating at 65 °C has a higher exergoeconomic value than the traditional one. The maximum CO₂ mitigation in cases 1 and 5 was approximately 28 tons and 160 tons, respectively.