Sara Kaffashi

Dr. Sara Kaffashi

School of Management, College Rd, Cranfield, Wharley End, Bedford MK43 0AL, UK

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 October 2019 in Journal of Cleaner Production
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Sara KaffashiSara Kaffashi
Sara Kaffashi
MSMad Nasir Shamsudin
Mad Nasir Shamsudin

1 April 2017 in Journal of Cleaner Production
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ABAbdullatif Bazrbachi
Abdullatif Bazrbachi
SSShaufique Fahmi Sidique
Shaufique Fahmi Sidique
MSMad Nasir Shamsudin
Mad Nasir Shamsudin
ARAlias Radam
Alias Radam
Sara KaffashiSara Kaffashi
Sara Kaffashi
SAShehu Usman Adam
Shehu Usman Adam

7 July 2015 in Forests
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Sara KaffashiSara Kaffashi
Sara Kaffashi
ARAlias Radam
Alias Radam
MSMad Nasir Shamsudin
Mad Nasir Shamsudin
YRYacob Mohd Rusli
Yacob Mohd Rusli
NNNor Hanim Nordin
Nor Hanim Nordin
Penang National Park (PNP), as Malaysia’s smallest national park, is one of the few naturally forested areas left on Penang Island, in Peninsular Malaysia. The main objective was to analyse users’ preferences and willingness to pay to enhance improved management of PNP for the dual aim of conservation and recreation. Structural equation modelling (SEM) was used to analyse the formation of attitudes towards different aspects of PNP. Results showed that implementing enforcements with rules and regulations and imposing permits and charges on certain activities were the most influential variables of PNPs’ perceptions. The results of a random parameter logit model (RPL) demonstrated that visitors placed the highest value on having adequate information about PNP, and the second-highest value on improvements in the park’s ecological management. The welfare measure for improvement in management of PNP against status quo is estimated at about MYR 9. Results also showed that demand for better conservation and management of PNP is relatively price-inelastic. Simulations of the results showed, under a MYR10 admission fee, that improvement in management would have 96% of market share compared with status quo. This study concluded that visitor entrance fees can and ought to be introduced as a means of financing conservation initiatives and possibly preventing congestion.

1 July 2015 in Forest Policy and Economics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Sara KaffashiSara Kaffashi
Sara Kaffashi
MYMohd Rusli Yacob
Mohd Rusli Yacob
MCMaynard S. Clark
Maynard S. Clark
ARAlias Radam
Alias Radam
MMMohd Farid Mamat
Mohd Farid Mamat

17 May 2011 in Regional Environmental Change
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Sara KaffashiSara Kaffashi
Sara Kaffashi
MSMad Nasir Shamsudin
Mad Nasir Shamsudin
ARAlias Radam
Alias Radam
KRKhalid Abdul Rahim
Khalid Abdul Rahim
MYMohd Rusli Yacob
Mohd Rusli Yacob
MYMuhammad Yazid
Muhammad Yazid

19 March 2013 in International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Sara KaffashiSara Kaffashi
Sara Kaffashi
MSMad Nasir Shamsudin
Mad Nasir Shamsudin
ARAlias Radam
Alias Radam
KRKhalid Abdul Rahim
Khalid Abdul Rahim
MYMohd Rusli Yacob
Mohd Rusli Yacob
The main objective of this study is to elicit the benefits that arise from Shadegan wetland in southern Iran to the users of this ecosystem, who are impacted most significantly by degradation/conversion of this ecosystem. Hence, a choice experiment (CE) and contingent valuation method (CVM) survey of users of the Shadegan wetland were conducted to estimate the value of non-market services provided by the wetland. The benefits from high-level conservation of the wetland are estimated from CVM to be about US$ 2.26 per household of users. Meanwhile, the estimated compensated surplus from CE was about US$ 8.28. Findings of this study suggest that the high value of Shadegan wetland for user communities can help policy-makers and wetland managers adopt policies that have no further conversion benefits than conservation or risks of degradation.