Elaine Jaffe

Dr. Elaine Jaffe

National Cancer Institute (NCI), Bethesda, MD, USA
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

36Years (1991-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
19 May 2016 in Blood
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SSSteven H. Swerdlow
Steven H. Swerdlow
ECElias Campo
Elias Campo
SPStefano A. Pileri
Stefano A. Pileri
NHNancy Lee Harris
Nancy Lee Harris
HSHarald Stein
Harald Stein
Elaine JaffeElaine Jaffe
Elaine Jaffe
A revision of the nearly 8-year-old World Health Organization classification of the lymphoid neoplasms and the accompanying monograph is being published. It reflects a consensus among hematopathologists, geneticists, and clinicians regarding both updates to current entities as well as the addition of a limited number of new provisional entities. The revision clarifies the diagnosis and management of lesions at the very early stages of lymphomagenesis, refines the diagnostic criteria for some entities, details the expanding genetic/molecular landscape of numerous lymphoid neoplasms and their clinical correlates, and refers to investigations leading to more targeted therapeutic strategies. The major changes are reviewed with an emphasis on the most important advances in our understanding that impact our diagnostic approach, clinical expectations, and therapeutic strategies for the lymphoid neoplasms.

12 May 2011 in Blood
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ECElias Campo
Elias Campo
SSSteven H. Swerdlow
Steven H. Swerdlow
NHNancy L. Harris
Nancy L. Harris
SPStefano Pileri
Stefano Pileri
HSHarald Stein
Harald Stein
Elaine JaffeElaine Jaffe
Elaine Jaffe
The World Health Organization classification of lymphoid neoplasms updated in 2008 represents a worldwide consensus on the diagnosis of these tumors and is based on the recognition of distinct diseases, using a multidisciplinary approach. The updated classification refined the definitions of well-recognized diseases, identified new entities and variants, and incorporated emerging concepts in the understanding of lymphoid neoplasms. However, some questions were unresolved, such as the extent to which specific genetic or molecular alterations define certain tumors, and the status of provisional entities, categories for which the World Health Organization working groups felt there was insufficient evidence to recognize as distinct diseases at this time. In addition, since its publication, new findings and ideas have been generated. This review summarizes the scientific rationale for the classification, emphasizing changes that have had an effect on practice guidelines. The authors address the criteria and significance of early or precursor lesions and the identification of certain lymphoid neoplasms largely associated with particular age groups, such as children and the elderly. The issue of borderline categories having overlapping features with large B-cell lymphomas, as well as several provisional entities, is reviewed. These new observations chart a course for future research in the field.

15 September 2022 in Blood
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ECElias Campo
Elias Campo
Elaine JaffeElaine Jaffe
Elaine Jaffe
JCJames R. Cook
James R. Cook
LQLeticia Quintanilla-Fend
Leticia Quintanilla-Fend
SSSteven H. Swerdlow
Steven H. Swerdlow
AZAndrew D. Zelenetz
Andrew D. Zelenetz
Since the publication of the Revised European-American Classification of Lymphoid Neoplasms in 1994, subsequent updates of the classification of lymphoid neoplasms have been generated through iterative international efforts to achieve broad consensus among hematopathologists, geneticists, molecular scientists, and clinicians. Significant progress has recently been made in the characterization of malignancies of the immune system, with many new insights provided by genomic studies. They have led to this proposal. We have followed the same process that was successfully used for the third and fourth editions of the World Health Organization Classification of Hematologic Neoplasms. The definition, recommended studies, and criteria for the diagnosis of many entities have been extensively refined. Some categories considered provisional have now been upgraded to definite entities. Terminology for some diseases has been revised to adapt nomenclature to the current knowledge of their biology, but these modifications have been restricted to well-justified situations. Major findings from recent genomic studies have impacted the conceptual framework and diagnostic criteria for many disease entities. These changes will have an impact on optimal clinical management. The conclusions of this work are summarized in this report as the proposed International Consensus Classification of mature lymphoid, histiocytic, and dendritic cell tumors.

22 December 2010 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
VNVu N. Ngo
Vu N. Ngo
RYRyan M. Young
Ryan M. Young
RSRoland Schmitz
Roland Schmitz
SJSameer Jhavar
Sameer Jhavar
WXWenming Xiao
Wenming Xiao
LSLouis M. Staudt
Louis M. Staudt

18 April 2019 in Blood
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RWRein Willemze
Rein Willemze
LCLorenzo Cerroni
Lorenzo Cerroni
WKWerner Kempf
Werner Kempf
EBEmilio Berti
Emilio Berti
FFFabio Facchetti
Fabio Facchetti
Elaine JaffeElaine Jaffe
Elaine Jaffe
Primary cutaneous lymphomas are a heterogeneous group of T- and B-cell lymphomas that present in the skin with no evidence of extracutaneous disease at the time of diagnosis. The 2005 World Health Organization–European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (WHO-EORTC) consensus classification has served as a golden standard for the diagnosis and classification of these conditions. In September 2018, an updated version of the WHO-EORTC was published in the fourth edition of the WHO Classification of Skin Tumours Blue Book. In this classification, primary cutaneous acral CD8+ T-cell lymphoma and Epstein-Barr virus positive (EBV+) mucocutaneous ulcer are included as new provisional entities, and a new section on cutaneous forms of chronic active EBV disease has been added. The term “primary cutaneous CD4+ small/medium T-cell lymphoma” was modified to “primary cutaneous CD4+ small/medium T-cell lymphoproliferative disorder” because of its indolent clinical behavior and uncertain malignant potential. Modifications have also been made in the sections on lymphomatoid papulosis, increasing the spectrum of histologic and genetic types, and primary cutaneous marginal zone lymphomas recognizing 2 different subtypes. Herein, the characteristic features of these new and modified entities as well as the results of recent molecular studies with diagnostic, prognostic, and/or therapeutic significance for the different types of primary cutaneous lymphomas are reviewed. An update of the frequency and survival of the different types of primary cutaneous lymphomas is provided.

11 March 2010 in New England Journal of Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CSChristian Steidl
Christian Steidl
TLTang Lee
Tang Lee
SSSohrab P. Shah
Sohrab P. Shah
PFPedro Farinha
Pedro Farinha
GHGuangming Han
Guangming Han
RGRandy D. Gascoyne
Randy D. Gascoyne
Despite advances in treatments for Hodgkin's lymphoma, about 20% of patients still die from progressive disease. Current prognostic models predict the outcome of treatment with imperfect accuracy, and clinically relevant biomarkers have not been established to improve on the International Prognostic Score. Using gene-expression profiling, we analyzed 130 frozen samples obtained from patients with classic Hodgkin's lymphoma during diagnostic lymph-node biopsy to determine which cellular signatures were correlated with treatment outcome. We confirmed our findings in an independent cohort of 166 patients, using immunohistochemical analysis. Gene-expression profiling identified a gene signature of tumor-associated macrophages that was significantly associated with primary treatment failure (P=0.02). In an independent cohort of patients, we found that an increased number of CD68+ macrophages was correlated with a shortened progression-free survival (P=0.03) and with an increased likelihood of relapse after autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (P=0.008), resulting in shortened disease-specific survival (P=0.003). In multivariate analysis, this adverse prognostic factor outperformed the International Prognostic Score for disease-specific survival (P=0.003 vs. P=0.03). The absence of an elevated number of CD68+ cells in patients with limited-stage disease defined a subgroup of patients with a long-term disease-specific survival of 100% with the use of current treatment strategies. An increased number of tumor-associated macrophages was strongly associated with shortened survival in patients with classic Hodgkin's lymphoma and provides a new biomarker for risk stratification.