Background: Restoring the anatomical footprint may improve the healing and mechanical strength of repaired tendons. A double row of suture anchors increases the tendon-bone contact area, reconstituting a more anatomical configuration of the rotator cuff footprint. Hypothesis: There is no difference in clinical and imaging outcome between single-row and double-row suture anchor technique repairs of rotator cuff tears. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. Methods: The authors recruited 60 patients. In 30 patients, rotator cuff repair was performed with a single-row suture anchor technique (group 1). In the other 30 patients, rotator cuff repair was performed with a double-row suture anchor technique (group 2). Results: Eight patients (4 in the single-row anchor repair group and 4 in the double-row anchor repair group) did not return at the final follow-up. At the 2-year follow-up, no statistically significant differences were seen with respect to the University of California, Los Angeles score and range of motion values. At 2-year follow-up, postoperative magnetic resonance arthrography in group 1 showed intact tendons in 14 patients, partial-thickness defects in 10 patients, and full-thickness defects in 2 patients. In group 2, magnetic resonance arthrography showed an intact rotator cuff in 18 patients, partial-thickness defects in 7 patients, and full-thickness defects in 1 patient. Conclusion: Single- and double-row techniques provide comparable clinical outcome at 2 years. A double-row technique produces a mechanically superior construct compared with the single-row method in restoring the anatomical footprint of the rotator cuff, but these mechanical advantages do not translate into superior clinical performance.

The Movin scoring system and its validated modifications and the Bonar scoring system are used to classify the histopathological findings of tendinopathy. We compared the reliability of these two different histopathological evaluation scores of tendon tissue. Tendon samples were harvested from 88 individuals (49 men, 39 women; mean age, 58.2 years) who underwent arthroscopic repair of a rotator cuff tear, and from five male patients who died of cardiovascular events (mean age, 69.6 years). A piece of supraspinatus tendon that was not directly involved in the tear was harvested en bloc within the intact middle portion of the tendon. Using hematoxylin and eosin staining and Alcian blue, slides were assessed using Bonar and Movin scores. The intraclass correlation was 0.921 (confidence interval 95% 0.790–0.963). Movin’s and Bonar’s scores have a high correlation and assess similar characteristics and variables of tendon abnormalities.

Background: Causes of rotator cuff pathology are poorly understood. Hypothesis: Macroscopically intact supraspinatus tendon may show profound light microscopy changes. These changes may be the pathogenic precursor to a subsequent rotator cuff tear. Study Design: Comparative laboratory study. Methods: Tendon samples were harvested from 88 individuals (49 men, 39 women; mean age, 58.2 years) who had sustained a rotator cuff tear and underwent arthroscopic repair of the lesion, and from 5 male patients who died of cardiovascular events (mean age, 69. 6 years). A full-thickness supraspinatus tendon biopsy specimen was harvested en bloc within the arthroscopically intact middle portion of the tendon between the lateral edge of the tendon tear and the muscle-tendon junction. Slides stained with hematoxylin and eosin were interpreted twice by the same observer using a semiquantitative grading scale assessing fiber structure and arrangement, rounding of the nuclei, regional variations in cellularity, increased vascularity, decreased colagen stainability, and hyalinization. Intraobserver reliability of the subscore readings was calculated. Results: The mean pathologic sum-score of ruptured tendons was significantly greater than the mean pathologic score of control tendons (15.66 ± 1.82 vs 3.7 ± 2.31, P = .001). Within each specific category of tendon abnormalities, the control and ruptured tendons were significantly different <χ ² test); all variables were significantly different (Mann-Whitney U test <0.05; P = .001). The agreement between the 2 readings ranged from 0.56 to 0.86 (kappa statistics). Conclusion: Nonruptured supraspinatus tendons, even at an advanced age, and ruptured supraspinatus tendons are clearly part of 2 distinct populations. Clinical Relevance: During cuff repair, it is not necessary to excessively freshen the torn tendon to bleeding tissue: the macroscopically intact supraspinatus tendon is degenerated as well, and the failed healing response is not limited to the ends of the torn tendon.

Many scoring systems have been used for elbow disorders. However, only few of these have been validated, and many assess only few aspects of elbow function. A literature search was performed using the keyword ‘elbow’ in combination with ‘scoring system’, ‘outcome assessment’, ‘elbow disorder’ and ‘clinical evaluation’. Eighteen scoring systems are currently available for the evaluation of elbow disorders. Each of them evaluates the elbow performance using specific variables, including both objective and subjective criteria. All these scoring systems are presented. Although many scoring systems have been used to evaluate elbow function, we are still far from a single outcome evaluation system which is reliable, valid and sensitive to clinically relevant changes, takes into account both patients' and physicians' perspective and is short and practical to use. Further studies are required to evaluate the reliability, validity and sensitivity of the elbow scoring systems used in the common clinical practice.

Arthroscopic management has been recommended for some superior labrum anterior and posterior (SLAP) lesions, but no studies have focused on patients over 50 years of age with rotator cuff tear and a type II SLAP lesion. In patients over 50 years of age with an arthroscopically confirmed lesion of the rotator cuff and a type II SLAP lesion, there is no difference between (1) repair of both lesions and (2) repair of the rotator cuff tear without repair of the SLAP II lesion but with a tenotomy of the long head of the biceps. Randomized controlled clinical trial; Level of evidence, 1. We recruited 63 patients. In 31 patients, we repaired the rotator cuff and the type II SLAP lesion (group 1). In the other 32 patients, we repaired the rotator cuff and tenotomized the long head of the biceps (group 2). Seven patients (2 in group 1 and 5 in group 2) were lost to final follow-up. At a minimum 2.9 years’ follow-up, statistically significant differences were seen with respect to the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) score and range of motion values. In group 1 (SLAP repair and rotator cuff repair), the UCLA showed a statistically significant improvement from a preoperative average rating of 10.4 (range, 6–14) to an average of 27.9 (range, 24–35) postoperatively (P < .001). In group 2 (biceps tenotomy and rotator cuff repair), the UCLA showed a statistically significant improvement from a preoperative average rating of 10.1 (range, 5–14) to an average of 32.1 (range, 30–35) postoperatively (P < .001) There was a statistically significant difference in total postoperative UCLA scores and range of motion when comparing the 2 groups postoperatively (P < .05). There are no advantages in repairing a type II SLAP lesion when associated with a rotator cuff tear in patients over 50 years of age. The association of rotator cuff repair and biceps tenotomy provides better clinical outcome compared with repair of the type II SLAP lesion and the rotator cuff.

In meniscal root tears (MRTs), the disruption of collagen fibers that provide hoop strength results in extrusion of the menisci, altering their biomechanical properties. Clinical diagnosis is difficult, but magnetic resonance imaging usually allows to identify the lesion. Located into the vascularized zone of the meniscus, management is preferentially arthroscopic, aimed at repairing the lesions with arthroscopic transosseous sutures or suture anchors. PubMed, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar and Ovid Medline were searched in July 2012 to find literature on MRT tears. We reviewed the literature on biomechanics, imaging features and current treatments of these tears. Twenty-seven appropriate articles were identified and included in the study: 6 biomechanical studies, 11 imaging-based investigations for diagnosis, 1 study on clinical diagnosis and 9 studies about treatment. MRTs are infrequent, accounting for 10.1% of all arthroscopic meniscectomies. When the damage occurs to the roots, the transmission of the circumferential hoop tension is impaired and, consequently, the menisci tend to be displaced anteriorly and posteriorly, altering the biomechanics and possibly the kinematics of the knee. Although the importance of the integrity of the meniscal roots is well established, their diagnosis and treatment are still controversial. Biomechanical and clinical studies demonstrate that surgical repair of acute, traumatic meniscal root injuries fully restores the biomechanical features of the menisci, leading to pain relief and functional improvement. The current available surgical techniques for the meniscal root repair (suture anchors and pullout repair) are comparable. IV.