Nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) has been described as one of the most important molecules linking inflammation to cancer. More recently, it has become clear that NF-κB is also involved in the regulation of immune checkpoint expression. Therapeutic approaches targeting immune checkpoint molecules, enabling the immune system to initiate immune responses against tumor cells, constitute a key breakthrough in cancer treatment. This review discusses recent evidence for an association of NF-κB and immune checkpoint expression and examines the therapeutic potential of inhibitors targeting either NF-κB directly or molecules involved in NF-κB regulation in combination with immune checkpoint blockade.

Patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) caused by human papilloma virus (HPV) exhibit a better prognosis than those with HPV-negative OPSCC. This study investigated the distinct molecular pathways that delineate HPV-negative from HPV-positive OPSCC to identify biologically relevant therapeutic targets. Bulk mRNA from 23 HPV-negative and 39 HPV-positive OPSCC tumors (n = 62) was sequenced to uncover the transcriptomic profiles. Differential expression followed by gene set enrichment analysis was performed to outline the top enriched biological process in the HPV-negative compared with HPV-positive entity. INHBA, the highest overexpressed gene in the HPV-negative tumor, was knocked down. Functional assays (migration, proliferation, cell death, stemness) were conducted to confirm the target's oncogenic role. Correlation analyses to reveal its impact on the tumor microenvironment were performed. We revealed that epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is the most enriched process in HPV-negative compared with HPV-positive OPSCC, with INHBA (inhibin beta A subunit) being the top upregulated gene. INHBA knockdown downregulated the expression of EMT transcription factors and attenuated migration, proliferation, stemness, and cell death resistance of OPSCC cells. We uncovered that INHBA associates with a pro-tumor microenvironment by negatively correlating with antitumor CD8+ T and B cells while positively correlating with pro-tumor M1 macrophages. We identified three miRNAs that are putatively involved in repressing INHBA expression. Our results indicate that the upregulation of INHBA is tumor-promoting. We propose INHBA as an attractive therapeutic target for the treatment of INHBA-enriched tumors in patients with HPV-negative OPSCC to ameliorate prognosis. Significance: Patients with HPV-negative OPSCC have a poorer prognosis due to distinct molecular pathways. This study reveals significant transcriptomic differences between HPV-negative and HPV-positive OPSCC, identifying INHBA as a key upregulated gene in HPV-negative OPSCC's oncogenic pathways. INHBA is crucial in promoting EMT, cell proliferation, and an immunosuppressive tumor environment, suggesting its potential as a therapeutic target for HPV-negative OPSCC.

BOB.1/OBF.1 is a lymphocyte‐specific transcriptional co‐activator of octamer‐dependent transcription. It regulates the expression of genes important for lymphocyte physiology together with the Oct‐1 and Oct‐2 transcription factors. So far, BOB.1/OBF.1 has been studied in conventional knockout mice, whereby a function of BOB.1/OBF.1 in B but also in T cells was described. The main characteristic of BOB.1/OBF.1‐deficient mice is the complete absence of germinal centers. However, it is entirely unsolved at which stage of B‐cell development BOB.1/OBF.1 expression is essential for germinal center formation. Still, it is not known whether defects observed late in B‐cell development of BOB.1/OBF.1‐deficient mice are merely a consequence of defective early B‐cell development. To answer the question, whether BOB.1/OBF.1 expression is required before or during the process of germinal center formation, we established a mouse system, which allows the conditional deletion of BOB.1/OBF.1 at different stages of B‐cell development. Our data reveal a requirement for BOB.1/OBF.1 during both early antigen‐independent and late antigen‐dependent B‐cell development, and further a requirement for efficient germinal center reaction during complete B‐cell ontogeny. By specifically deleting BOB.1/OBF.1 in germinal center B cells, we provide evidence that the failure to form germinal centers is a germinal center B‐cell intrinsic defect and not exclusively a consequence of defective early B‐cell maturation.

Background: Metastases are associated with poor survival in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients and tumour-associated macrophages (TAMs) are important drivers in tumour progression and metastasis formation. Small extracellular vesicles (sEVs) are another important factor that contribute to systemic immunosuppression and pre-metastatic niche formation. Here, we investigate the effect of plasma sEVs from HNSCC patients on pre-metastatic niche formation, directly or through modulation of macrophages. Methods: Primary macrophages were incubated with sEVs from plasma of HNSCC patients or healthy donors (HD). RNA profiles and inflammatory properties of macrophages were evaluated. Direct and indirect effects of sEVs on chemotaxis, T cell activation, proliferation and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) of tumour cells were investigated. Results: sEVs of HNSCC patients and HD induced different RNA profiles in macrophages. sEVs induced apoptosis and inhibition of T cell activation, while tumour cells were attracted by sEV-treated macrophages, but not sEVs directly. Proliferation was inhibited by both, sEVs and supernatant of EV-treated macrophages in HNSCC. Additionally, EMT in tumour cells was reversed by HNSCC sEV-treated macrophages. Conclusion: sEVs from plasma of HNSCC patients transformed macrophages into metastasis-promoting TAMs and inhibited anti-tumour T cells, highlighting the potential of sEVs and TAMs as targets for therapeutic approaches.

Here, we describe the expression of Bruton’s Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) cell lines as well as in primary HNSCC samples. BTK is a kinase initially thought to be expressed exclusively in cells of hematopoietic origin. Apart from the 77 kDa BTK isoform expressed in immune cells, particularly in B cells, we identified the 80 kDa and 65 kDa BTK isoforms in HNSCC, recently described as oncogenic. Importantly, we revealed that both isoforms are products of the same mRNA. By investigating the mechanism regulating oncogenic BTK-p80/p65 expression in HNSSC versus healthy or benign tissues, our data suggests that the epigenetic process of methylation might be responsible for the initiation of BTK-p80/p65 expression in HNSCC. Our findings demonstrate that chemical or genetic abrogation of BTK activity leads to inhibition of tumor progression in terms of proliferation and vascularization in vitro and in vivo. These observations were associated with cell cycle arrest and increased apoptosis and autophagy. Together, these data indicate BTK-p80 and BTK-p65 as novel HNSCC-associated oncogenes. Owing to the fact that abundant BTK expression is a characteristic feature of primary and metastatic HNSCC, targeting BTK activity appears as a promising therapeutic option for HNSCC patients.

The transcriptional co‐activator BOB.1/OBF.1, originally identified in B cells, plays an essential role for the development and function of B and T lymphocytes. The main characteristic of BOB.1/OBF.1‐deficient mice is the absence of germinal center formation due to a failure of both B cells as well as follicular B helper T cells. Here we describe a novel, not noticed before feature of BOB.1/OBF.1‐deficient mice – the reduction in number and size of Peyer's Patches that in addition exhibit a disturbed microarchitecture. Our results indicate that BOB.1/OBF.1 plays an important role in lymphoid organogenesis, most likely by affecting the CXCL13‐ CXCR5‐Lymphotoxin α1/β2 axis. Therefore, the reduced B and T cell numbers found in lymph nodes and spleen of BOB.1/OBF.1‐deficient animals could be, in addition to B cell developmental defects, also a result of an insufficient secondary lymphoid organogenesis. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved