The cells and proteases that mediate cigarette smoke–induced emphysema are controversial, with evidence favoring either neutrophils and neutrophil-derived serine proteases or macrophages and macrophage-derived metalloproteases as the important effectors. We recently reported that both macrophage metalloelastase (MMP-12) and neutrophils are required for acute cigarette smoke-induced connective tissue breakdown, the precursor of emphysema. Here we show how these disparate observations can be linked. Both wild-type (MMP-12 +/+) mice and mice lacking MMP-12 (MMP-12 −/−) demonstrated rapid increases in whole-lung nuclear factor-κB activation and gene expression of proinflammatory cytokines after cigarette smoke exposure, indicating that a lack of MMP-12 does not produce a global failure to upregulate inflammatory mediators. However, only MMP-12 +/+ mice demonstrated increased whole-lung tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) protein or release of TNF-α from cultured alveolar macrophages exposed to smoke in vitro. Levels of whole-lung E-selectin, an endothelial activation marker, were increased in only MMP-12 +/+ mice. These findings suggest that, acutely, MMP-12 mediates smoke-induced inflammation by releasing TNF-α from macrophages, with subsequent endothelial activation, neutrophil influx, and proteolytic matrix breakdown caused by neutrophil-derived proteases. TNF-α release may be a general mechanism whereby metalloproteases drive cigarette smoke–induced inflammation.

Mice lacking tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) receptors (TNFRKO mice) do not develop an inflammatory infiltrate or matrix breakdown after a single acute cigarette smoke exposure. To determine the role of TNF-α in the long-term development of emphysema, mice were exposed to smoke for 6 months. TNFRKO mice demonstrated an 11% increase in mean linear intercept; wild-type mice had a 38% increase. TNFRKO mice had 65% fewer neutrophils and no increase in macrophages in lavage fluid. Whole lung matrix metalloprotease (MMP)-2, MMP-9, MMP-12, MMP-13, and matrix type-1 (MT1)-MMP proteins were increased in wild-type mice, but smaller increases in MMP-12, MMP-13, and MT1-MMP were also seen in TNFRKO mice. Lavage matrix breakdown products were elevated in wild-type mice and only partially reduced by anti-neutrophil antibody, implying both neutrophil- and non–neutrophil-mediated matrix breakdown. We conclude that TNF-α–mediated processes, probably driving neutrophil influx, are responsible for approximately 70% of airspace enlargement and the majority of inflammatory cell influx/matrix breakdown in the mouse model. TNF-α causes increased MMP production, but some increased MMP activity is present even in TNFRKO mice. These findings imply a second TNF-α–independent process, possibly related to direct MMP attack on matrix, that produces the remaining 30% of airspace enlargement.

The role of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) as a mediator of cigarette smoke–induced disease is controversial. We exposed mice with knocked-out p55/p75 TNF-α receptors (TNF-α–RKO mice) to cigarette smoke and compared them with control mice. Two hours after smoke exposure, increases in gene expression of TNF-α, neutrophil chemoattractant, macrophage inflammatory protein-2, and macrophage chemoattractant, protein-1 were seen in control mice. By 6 hours, TNF-α, macrophage inflammatory protein-2, and macrophage chemoattractant protein-1 gene expression levels had returned to control values in control mice and stayed at control values through 24 hours. In TNF-α–RKO mice, no changes in gene expression of these mediators were seen at any time. At 24 hours, control mice demonstrated increases in lavage neutrophils, macrophages, desmosine (a measure of elastin breakdown), and hydroxyproline (a measure of collagen breakdown), whereas TNF-α–RKO mice did not. In separate experiments, pure strain 129 mice, which produce low levels of TNF-α, showed no inflammatory response to smoke at 24 hours or 7 days. We conclude that TNF-α is central to acute smoke-induced inflammation and resulting connective tissue breakdown, the precursor of emphysema. The findings support the idea that TNF-α promoter polymorphisms may be of importance in determining who develops smoke-induced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

There is considerable evidence that matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are up- and/or downregulated in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), particularly in emphysema, in which they probably participate in proteolytic attack on the alveolar wall matrix. Recent data suggest that MMPs also have major roles in driving inflammation or shutting it down, as well as modifying the release of fibrogenic growth factors, processes that are important in the genesis of the various lesions of COPD. In cigarette smoke-induced animal models of emphysema, MMP-12 appears to play a consistent and important role, whereas the data for other MMPs are difficult to interpret. In human lungs, evidence for a role for MMPs is more tenuous and there are numerous contradictions in the literature. Little is known about the effects of MMPs in small airway remodelling, smoke-induced pulmonary hypertension and chronic bronchitis, but MMP-12 participates in experimental small airway modelling. To date, the accumulated data suggest that selective inhibition of MMP-12 might be a viable therapy for emphysema and small airway remodelling, but subtle differences in the functions of MMP-12 in animals and humans mandate caution with this approach. Whether inhibition of other MMPs might be useful is unclear.

Cigarette smoke-induced animal models of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease support the protease-antiprotease hypothesis of emphysema, although which cells and proteases are the crucial actors remains controversial. Inhibition of either serine or metalloproteases produces significant protection against emphysema, but inhibition is invariably accompanied by decreases in the inflammatory response to cigarette smoke, suggesting that these inhibitors do more than just prevent matrix degradation. Direct anti-inflammatory interventions are also effective against the development of emphysema, as are antioxidant strategies; the latter again decrease smoke-induced inflammation. There is increasing evidence for autoimmunity, perhaps directed against matrix components, as a driving force in emphysema. There is intriguing but controversial animal model evidence that failure to repair/failure of lung maintenance also plays a role in the pathogenesis of emphysema. Cigarette smoke produces small airway remodeling in laboratory animals, possibly by direct induction of fibrogenic growth factors in the airway wall, and also produces pulmonary hypertension, at least in part through direct upregulation of vasoactive mediators in the intrapulmonary arteries. Smoke exposure causes goblet cell metaplasia and excess mucus production in the small airways and proximal trachea, but these changes are not good models of either chronic bronchitis or acute exacerbations. Emphysema, small airway remodeling, pulmonary hypertension, and mucus production appear to be at least partially independent processes that may require different therapeutic approaches.

The separation of benign from malignant mesothelial proliferations has emerged as a major problem in the pathology of the serosal membranes. For both epithelial and spindle cell mesothelial processes, true stromal invasion is the most accurate indicator of malignancy, but stromal invasion is often difficult to assess, especially in small biopsies. In the pleural cavity, deep penetration of a thickened and fibrotic pleura or penetration of mesothelial cells into the fat of the chest wall are good indicators of malignancy; however, superficial entrapment of mesothelial cells and glands by organizing effusions is common in benign reactions and needs to be distinguished from invasion. In the peritoneal cavity, invasion of fat or of organ walls is again the most reliable indicator of malignancy, but entrapment of benign cells in organizing granulation tissue or between fat lobules is frequent and confusing. Proliferations confined to the pleural or peritoneal space, particularly linear arrays of atypical mesothelial cells on the free surface, should not be called malignant in the absence of unequivocal invasion. Cytologic atypia is often not helpful in separating benign from malignant reactions, because benign processes are commonly atypical and mesotheliomas are often deceptively monotonous. Densely packed mesothelial cells within the pleural space are frequent in benign reactions, but densely packed mesothelial cells within the stroma favor a diagnosis of malignancy. Organizing effusions (fibrous pleurisy) typically show zonation with high cellularity and cytologic atypia toward the pleural space and increasing fibrosis with decreasing cellularity and lesser atypia toward the chest wall, whereas sarcomatous (including desmoplastic) mesotheliomas do not demonstrate this type of zonation. Elongated capillaries perpendicular to the pleural surface are seen in organizing effusions but are not a feature of sarcomatous mesotheliomas. The combination of a paucicellular storiform pattern, plus invasion of the stroma (including fat and adjacent tissues), or bland necrosis, overtly sarcomatous foci, or distant metastases, is required for the diagnosis of desmoplastic mesothelioma. Necrosis is usually a sign of malignancy but is occasionally seen in benign mesothelial reactions. Keratin staining is useful in indicating the distribution of mesothelial cells, and particularly in demonstrating penetration of mesothelial cells into the stroma or adjacent structures, but is of no help in separating benign and malignant proliferations because both are keratin-positive. Although both p53 and EMA staining have been proposed as markers of mesothelial malignancy, in our experience they are not helpful for the individual case.