Ching Sing Chai

Prof. Ching Sing Chai

The Chinese University of Hong Kong

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2021 in Complexity
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Xuesong ZhaiXuesong Zhai
Xuesong Zhai
XCXiaoyan Chu
Xiaoyan Chu
CCChing Sing Chai
Ching Sing Chai
Morris JONGMorris JONG
Morris JONG
Andreja Istenic StarcicAndreja Istenic Starcic
Andreja Istenic Starcic
YLYan Li
Yan Li
This study provided a content analysis of studies aiming to disclose how artificial intelligence (AI) has been applied to the education sector and explore the potential research trends and challenges of AI in education. A total of 100 papers including 63 empirical papers (74 studies) and 37 analytic papers were selected from the education and educational research category of Social Sciences Citation Index database from 2010 to 2020. The content analysis showed that the research questions could be classified into development layer (classification, matching, recommendation, and deep learning), application layer (feedback, reasoning, and adaptive learning), and integration layer (affection computing, role‐playing, immersive learning, and gamification). Moreover, four research trends, including Internet of Things, swarm intelligence, deep learning, and neuroscience, as well as an assessment of AI in education, were suggested for further investigation. However, we also proposed the challenges in education may be caused by AI with regard to inappropriate use of AI techniques, changing roles of teachers and students, as well as social and ethical issues. The results provide insights into an overview of the AI used for education domain, which helps to strengthen the theoretical foundation of AI in education and provides a promising channel for educators and AI engineers to carry out further collaborative research.

6 February 2023 in Interactive Learning Environments
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Thomas K.F. ChiuThomas K.F. Chiu
Thomas K.F. Chiu
BMBenjamin Luke Moorhouse
Benjamin Luke Moorhouse
CCChing Sing Chai
Ching Sing Chai
Murod IsmailovMurod Ismailov
Murod Ismailov
As Artificial Intelligence (AI) advances technologically, it will inevitably bring many changes to classroom practices. However, research on AI in education reflects a weak connection to pedagogical perspectives or instructional approaches, particularly in K-12 education. AI technologies may benefit motivated and advanced students. Understanding the teacher’s role of student motivation in mediating and supporting learning with AI technologies in the classroom is needed. This study used self-determination theory as the undergirding framework to investigate how teacher support moderates the effects of student expertise on needs satisfactions and intrinsic motivation to learn with AI technologies. This experimental study involved 123 Grade 10 students, and used chatbots as AI-based technologies in the experiment. The analyses revealed that intrinsic motivation and competence to learn with the chatbot depended on both teacher support and student expertise (i.e. self-regulated learning and digital literacy), and the teacher support better satisfied the need for relatedness, and it less satisfied the need for autonomy. The findings refined our understanding about the application of self-determination theory and expand the pedagogical and design considerations of AI application and instructional practices.

10 July 2020 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Thomas K.F. ChiuThomas K.F. Chiu
Thomas K.F. Chiu
CCChing Sing Chai
Ching Sing Chai
The teaching of artificial intelligence (AI) topics in school curricula is an important global strategic initiative in educating the next generation. As AI technologies are new to K-12 schools, there is a lack of studies that inform schools’ teachers about AI curriculum design. How to prepare and engage teachers, and which approaches are suitable for planning the curriculum for sustainable development, are unclear. Therefore, this case study aimed to explore the views of teachers with and without AI teaching experience on key considerations for the preparation, implementation and continuous refinement of a formal AI curriculum for K-12 schools. It drew on the self-determination theory (SDT) and four basic curriculum planning approaches—content, product, process and praxis—as theoretical frameworks to explain the research problems and findings. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 24 teachers—twelve with and twelve without experience in teaching AI—and used thematic analysis to analyze the interview data. Our findings revealed that genuine curriculum creation should encompass all four forms of curriculum design approach that are coordinated by teachers’ self-determination to be orchestrators of student learning experiences. This study also proposed a curriculum development cycle for teachers and curriculum officers.

17 July 2007 in Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TTTimothy Teo
Timothy Teo
CLC.B. Lee
C.B. Lee
CCChing Sing Chai
Ching Sing Chai

1 August 2011 in Computers & Education
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CCChing Sing Chai
Ching Sing Chai
JKJoyce Hwee Ling Koh
Joyce Hwee Ling Koh
CTChin-Chung Tsai
Chin-Chung Tsai
Lynde TanLynde Tan
Lynde Tan

14 August 2020 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YDYun Dai
Yun Dai
CCChing Sing Chai
Ching Sing Chai
PLPEI-YI LIN
PEI-YI LIN
Morris JONGMorris JONG
Morris JONG
YGYanmei Guo
Yanmei Guo
JQJian-Jun Qin
Jian-Jun Qin
This study developed and validated an instrument to measure students’ readiness to learn about artificial intelligence (AI). The designed survey questionnaire was administrated in a school district in Beijing after an AI course was developed and implemented. The collected data and analytical results provided insights regarding the self-reported perceptions of primary students’ AI readiness and enabled the identification of factors that may influence this parameter. The results indicated that AI literacy was not predictive of AI readiness. The influences of AI literacy were mediated by the students’ confidence and perception of AI relevance. The students’ AI readiness was not influenced by a reduction in their anxiety regarding AI and an enhancement in their AI literacy. Male students reported a higher confidence, relevance, and readiness for AI than female students did. The sentiments reflected by the open-ended responses of the students indicated that the students were generally excited to learn about AI and viewed AI as a powerful and useful technology. The student sentiments confirmed the quantitative findings. The validated survey can help teachers better understand and monitor students’ learning, as well as reflect on the design of the AI curriculum and the associated teaching effectiveness.