Oh Young Bang

Prof. Oh Young Bang

Samsung medical center
+1
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 November 2015 in Stroke
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
OBOh Young Bang
Oh Young Bang
MGMayank Goyal
Mayank Goyal
DLDavid S. Liebeskind
David S. Liebeskind

1 January 2014 in Journal of Stroke
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
OBOh Young Bang
Oh Young Bang
Bang OY. J Stroke. 2014 Jan;16(1):27-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.5853/jos.2014.16.1.27

31 January 2016 in Journal of Stroke
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
OBOh Young Bang
Oh Young Bang
MFMiki Fujimura
Miki Fujimura
SKSeung-Ki Kim
Seung-Ki Kim
Moyamoya disease (MMD) is a unique cerebrovascular disease characterized by the progressive stenosis of large intracranial arteries and a hazy network of basal collaterals called moyamoya vessels. Because the etiology of MMD is unknown, its diagnosis is based on characteristic angiographic findings. Re-vascularization techniques (e.g., bypass surgery) are used to restore perfusion, and are the primary treatment for MMD. There is no specific treatment to prevent MMD progression. This review summarizes the recent advances in MMD pathophysiology, including the genetic and circulating factors related to disease development. Genetic and environmental factors may play important roles in the development of the vascular stenosis and aberrant angiogenesis in complex ways. These factors include the related changes in circulating endothelial/smooth muscle progenitor cells, cytokines related to vascular remodeling and angiogenesis, and endothelium, such as caveolin which is a plasma membrane protein. With a better understanding of MMD pathophysiology, nonsurgical approaches targeting MMD pathogenesis may be available to stop or slow the progression of this disease. The possible strategies include targeting growth factors, retinoic acid, caveolin-1, and stem cells.

31 January 2020 in Journal of Stroke
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
OBOh Young Bang
Oh Young Bang
JCJong-Won Chung
Jong-Won Chung
MLMi Ji Lee
Mi Ji Lee
WSWoo-Keun Seo
Woo-Keun Seo
GKGyeong-Moon Kim
Gyeong-Moon Kim
OIOASIS-Cancer Study Investigators
OASIS-Cancer Study Investigators
Systemic cancer and ischemic stroke are common conditions and two of the most frequent causes of death among the elderly. The association between cancer and stroke has been reported worldwide. Stroke causes severe disability for cancer patients, while cancer increases the risk of stroke. Moreover, cancer-related stroke is expected to increase due to advances in cancer treatment and an aging population worldwide. Because cancer and stroke share risk factors (such as smoking and obesity) and treatment of cancer can increase the risk of stroke (e.g., accelerated atherosclerosis after radiation therapy), cancer may accelerate conventional stroke mechanisms (i.e., atherosclerosis, small vessel disease, and cardiac thrombus). In addition, active cancer and chemotherapy may enhance thrombin generation causing stroke related to coagulopathy. Patients with stroke due to cancer-related coagulopathy showed the characteristics findings of etiologic work ups, D-dimer levels, and infarct patterns. In this review, we summarized the frequency of cancer-related stroke among patients with ischemic stroke, mechanisms of stroke with in cancer patients, and evaluation and treatment of cancer-related stroke. We discussed the possibility of cancer-related stroke as a stroke subtype, and presented the most recent discoveries in the pathomechanisms and treatment of stroke due to cancer-related coagulopathy.

1 August 2014 in Stroke
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SRSookyung Ryoo
Sookyung Ryoo
JCJihoon Cha
Jihoon Cha
SKSuk Jae Kim
Suk Jae Kim
JCJin Wook Choi
Jin Wook Choi
CKChang-Seok Ki
Chang-Seok Ki
OBOh Young Bang
Oh Young Bang
Background and Purpose—: Diagnosis of Moyamoya disease (MMD) is based on the characteristic angiographic findings. However, differentiating MMD from intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) is difficult. We compared vessel wall imaging findings on high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging between MMD and ICAD. Methods—: High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging was performed on 32 patients with angiographically proven MMD and 16 patients with acute infarcts because of ICAD. Bilateral internal carotid arteries and steno-occlusive middle cerebral artery were analyzed for wall enhancement and remodeling. Results—: Enhancement patterns and distribution were different. Most patients with MMD (90.6%) showed concentric enhancement on distal internal carotid arteries and middle cerebral arteries, whereas focal eccentric enhancement was observed on the symptomatic segment in ICAD. MMD was characterized by middle cerebral artery shrinkage; the remodeling index and wall area were lower in MMD than in ICAD (remodeling index, 0.19±0.11 versus 1.00±0.43; wall area, 0.32±0.22 versus 6.00±2.72; P <0.001). Conclusions—: MMD was characterized by concentric enhancement on bilateral distal internal carotid arteries and shrinkage of middle cerebral artery, regardless of symptoms.

16 February 2021 in Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JCJong-Won Chung
Jong-Won Chung
WCWon Hyuk Chang
Won Hyuk Chang
OBOh Young Bang
Oh Young Bang
GMGyeong Joon Moon
Gyeong Joon Moon
SKSuk Jae Kim
Suk Jae Kim
YKYun-Hee Kim
Yun-Hee Kim
Objective To test whether autologous modified mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) improve recovery in patients with chronic major stroke. Methods In this prospective, open-label, randomized controlled trial with blinded outcome evaluation, patients with severe middle cerebral artery territory infarct within 90 days of symptom onset were assigned, in a 2:1 ratio, to receive preconditioned autologous MSC injections (MSC group) or standard treatment alone (control group). The primary outcome was the score on the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 3 months. The secondary outcome was to further demonstrate motor recovery. Results A total of 39 and 15 patients were included in the MSC and control groups, respectively, for the final intention-to-treat analysis. Mean age of patients was 68 (range 28–83) years, and mean interval between stroke onset to randomization was 20.2 (range 5–89) days. Baseline characteristics were not different between groups. There was no significant difference between the groups in the mRS score shift at 3 months (p = 0.732). However, secondary analyses showed significant improvements in lower extremity motor function in the MSC group compared to the control group (change in the leg score of the Motricity Index, p = 0.023), which was notable among patients with low predicted recovery potential. There were no serious treatment-related adverse events. Conclusions IV application of preconditioned, autologous MSCs with autologous serum was feasible and safe in patients with chronic major stroke. MSC treatment was not associated with improvements in the 3-month mRS score, but we did observe leg motor improvement in detailed functional analyses. Classification of Evidence This study provides Class III evidence that autologous MSCs do not improve 90-day outcomes in patients with chronic stroke. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01716481.