Sanliang Ling

Dr. Sanliang Ling

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
4 November 2019 in Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YCYongchul G. Chung
Yongchul G. Chung
EHEmmanuel Haldoupis
Emmanuel Haldoupis
BBBenjamin J. Bucior
Benjamin J. Bucior
MHMaciej Haranczyk
Maciej Haranczyk
SLSeulchan Lee
Seulchan Lee
RSRandall Snurr
Randall Snurr

13 May 2019 in Nature Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LLLingmei Liu
Lingmei Liu
ZCZhijie Chen
Zhijie Chen
JWJianjian Wang
Jianjian Wang
DZDaliang Zhang
Daliang Zhang
YZYihan Zhu
Yihan Zhu
HYHan Yu
Han Yu

15 January 2020 in Journal of the American Chemical Society
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ZZZeyuan Zhang
Zeyuan Zhang
ZZZhengqing Zhao
Zhengqing Zhao
LWLianwei Wu
Lianwei Wu
SLShuai Lu
Shuai Lu
SLSanliang Ling
Sanliang Ling
MZMingming Zhang
Mingming Zhang

22 March 2016 in Chemical Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SLSanliang Ling
Sanliang Ling
BSBen Slater
Ben Slater
The metal–organic framework (MOF) material UiO-66 has emerged as one of the most promising MOF materials due to its thermal and chemical stability and its potential for catalytic applications. We refine a recent experimental determination of the missing linker defect structure using static and dynamic first principles approaches, which reveals a dynamic and labile acid centre that could be tailored for functional applications in catalysis.

21 October 2020 in Journal of the American Chemical Society
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YHYali Hou
Yali Hou
ZZZeyuan Zhang
Zeyuan Zhang
SLShuai Lu
Shuai Lu
JYJun Yuan
Jun Yuan
QZQiangyu Zhu
Qiangyu Zhu
MZMingming Zhang
Mingming Zhang

10 April 2017 in Journal of the American Chemical Society
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MWMatthew Witman
Matthew Witman
SLSanliang Ling
Sanliang Ling
SJSudi Jawahery
Sudi Jawahery
PBPeter G. Boyd
Peter G. Boyd
MHMaciej Haranczyk
Maciej Haranczyk
BSBerend Smit
Berend Smit
For applications of metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) such as gas storage and separation, flexibility is often seen as a parameter that can tune material performance. In this work we aim to determine the optimal flexibility for the shape selective separation of similarly sized molecules (e.g., Xe/Kr mixtures). To obtain systematic insight into how the flexibility impacts this type of separation, we develop a simple analytical model that predicts a material’s Henry regime adsorption and selectivity as a function of flexibility. We elucidate the complex dependence of selectivity on a framework’s intrinsic flexibility whereby performance is either improved or reduced with increasing flexibility, depending on the material’s pore size characteristics. However, the selectivity of a material with the pore size and chemistry that already maximizes selectivity in the rigid approximation is continuously diminished with increasing flexibility, demonstrating that the globally optimal separation exists within an entirely rigid pore. Molecular simulations show that our simple model predicts performance trends that are observed when screening the adsorption behavior of flexible MOFs. These flexible simulations provide better agreement with experimental adsorption data in a high-performance material that is not captured when modeling this framework as rigid, an approximation typically made in high-throughput screening studies. We conclude that, for shape selective adsorption applications, the globally optimal material will have the optimal pore size/chemistry and minimal intrinsic flexibility even though other nonoptimal materials’ selectivity can actually be improved by flexibility. Equally important, we find that flexible simulations can be critical for correctly modeling adsorption in these types of systems.