Objectives: To develop normative data for wideband middle-ear reflectance in a newborn hearing-screening population and to compare test performance with 1-kHz tympanometry for prediction of otoacoustic emission (OAE) screening outcome. Design: Wideband middle-ear reflectance (using both tone and chirp stimuli from 0.2 to 6 kHz), 1-kHz tympanometry, and distortion-product (DP) OAEs were measured in 324 infants at two test sites. Ears were categorized into DP pass and DP refer groups. Results: Normative reflectance values were defined over various frequency regions for both tone and chirp stimuli in ambient pressure conditions, and for reflectance area indices integrated over various frequency ranges. Receiver operating characteristic analyses showed that reflectance provides the best discriminability of DP status in frequency ranges involving 2 kHz and greater discriminability of DP status than 1-kHz tympanometry. Repeated-measures analyses of variance established that (a) there were significant differences in reflectance as a function of DP status and frequency but not sex or ear; (b) tone and chirp stimulus reflectance values are essentially indistinguishable; and (c) newborns from two geographic sites had similar reflectance patterns above 1 kHz. Birth type and weight did not contribute to differences in reflectance. Conclusions: Referrals in OAE-based infant hearing screening were strongly associated with increased wideband reflectance, suggesting middle-ear dysfunction at birth. Reflectance improved significantly during the first 4 days after birth with normalization of middle-ear function. Reflectance scores can be achieved within seconds using the same equipment used for OAE screening. Newborns with high reflectance scores at stage I screening should be rescreened within a few hours to a few days, because most middle-ear problems are transient and resolve spontaneously. If reflectance and OAE are not passed upon stage II screening, referral to an otologist for ear examination is suggested along with diagnostic testing. Newborns with normal reflectance and a refer result for the OAE screen should be referred immediately to an audiologist for diagnostic testing with threshold auditory brainstem response because of higher risk for permanent hearing loss.

Wideband middle ear power (WMEP) measurement is a method of middle ear analysis that may provide improved diagnostic capability over single-frequency tympanometry. However, normative data, information about test–retest reliability, and results in clinical disorders are needed for clinical application. Normative and reliability data on WMEP in children three days to 47 months of age were obtained using a prototype commercial instrument. A prospective study was conducted in children enrolled from a well-child pediatric clinic (n = 97), with comparisons of age, gender, and middle ear status and stimulus type (broadband chirp and sine wave). No significant age effect for power reflectance across the age range of this study was found, except at 6000 Hz. Significantly higher-power reflectance was found for ears with poor ear status, specifically otitis media with effusion. Smaller but nonsignificant differences in power reflectance were found for ears with positive and negative tympanometric peak pressure. Intraclass correlation coefficients showed significant correlations of 0.68 to 0.97 at various test frequencies using the chirp stimulus. Multivariate analysis of variance showed no significant effect of stimulus type (sine wave vs broadband chirp), ear, or gender. These results provide normative data for wideband middle ear power analysis for infants and children from birth to age four years. Spanish Las medidas de potencia de banda ancha del oído medio (WMEP) constituyen un método de análisis del oído medio que puede proveer una habilidad diagnóstica mejorada sobre la timpanometría de frecuencia única. Sin embargo y para su aplicación clínica, se necesitan datos normativos, información sobre confiabilidad test-retest y resultados en trastornos clínicos. Se obtuvieron datos normativos y de confiabilidad en WMEP en niños desde 3 días hasta 47 meses de edad, usando un instrumento prototipo comercial. Se condujo un estudio prospectivo en niños reclutados de una clínica pediátrica de niño sano (n = 97), realizando comparaciones de edad, género, y condición del oído medio y tipo de estímulo (gorjeo de banda ancha y onda sinusal). No se encontró un efecto significativo de la edad para la reflectancia de la potencia a lo largo del rango de edades en este estudio, excepto a 6000 Hz. Se encontraron reflectancias de potencia significativamente mayores en oídos con pobre condición, especialmente con otitis media con derrame. Se encontraron diferencias menores pero no significativas en la reflectancia de la potencia en oídos con picos de presión timpanométrica positivos y negativos. Los coeficientes de correlación intra-clase mostraron correlaciones significativas de 0.68 a 0.97, en varias frecuencias de prueba, utilizando estímulos de tipo gorjeo. Los análisis multivariados de varianza no mostraron efecto significativo según el tipo de estímulo (onda sinusal vs. gorjeo de banda ancha), del oído o del género. Estos resultados aportan datos normativos para el análisis de potencia de banda ancha del oído medio en infantes y niños desde el nacimiento hasta la edad de 4 años.

Wideband acoustic immittance (WAI) measures have potential capability to improve newborn hearing screening outcomes and middle ear diagnosis for infants and children. To fully capitalize on these immittance measures for pediatric hearing care, developmental and pathologic effects need to be fully understood. Published literature on wideband immittance (reflectance, absorbance, tympanometry, and acoustic reflexes) is reviewed in this article to determine pathologic effects in newborns, infants, and children relative to standard audiologic tests such as otoacoustic emissions (OAEs), standard tympanometry, air and bone conduction auditory brainstem response, and otoscopy. Infants and children with surgically confirmed otitis media with effusion have lower absorbance in the mid-frequency range (1 to 3 kHz) for the affected ear(s). Newborns that do not pass OAE screening at birth also have lower absorbance for frequencies from 1 to 3 kHz, suggesting that nonpass results are frequently associated with middle ear issues at birth. In Newborn Hearing Screening Programs, WAI may help to interpret hearing screening results. Conclusions are limited by the fact that the true status of the middle ear and cochlea are not known for newborns and infants in studies that use OAE or tympanometry as the reference standard. Likelihood ratios for reflectance against surgery gold standards range from diagnostically suggestive to informative. Although some of the results are promising, limited evidence and methodological considerations restrict the conclusions that can be drawn regarding the diagnostic accuracy of WAI technologies in infants and children. Additional investigations using stronger gold standard comparisons are needed to determine which tools can most accurately predict middle ear status in the pediatric population.

Objectives: This study tested the hypothesis that undetected peripheral hearing impairment occurs in children with idiopathic listening difficulties (LiDs), as reported by caregivers using the Evaluation of Children”s Listening and Processing Skills (ECLiPS) validated questionnaire, compared with children with typically developed (TD) listening abilities. Design: Children with LiD aged 6–14 years old (n = 60, mean age = 9.9 yr) and 54 typical age matched children were recruited from audiology clinical records and from IRB-approved advertisements at hospital locations and in the local and regional areas. Both groups completed standard and extended high-frequency (EHF) pure-tone audiometry, wideband absorbance tympanometry and middle ear muscle reflexes, distortion product and chirp transient evoked otoacoustic emissions. Univariate and multivariate mixed models and multiple regression analysis were used to examine group differences and continuous performance, as well as the influence of demographic factors and pressure equalization (PE) tube history. Results: There were no significant group differences between the LiD and TD groups for any of the auditory measures tested. However, analyses across all children showed that EHF hearing thresholds, wideband tympanometry, contralateral middle ear muscle reflexes, distortion product, and transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions were related to a history of PE tube surgery. The physiologic measures were also associated with EHF hearing loss, secondary to PE tube history. Conclusions: Overall, the results of this study in a sample of children with validated LiD compared with a TD group matched for age and sex showed no significant differences in peripheral function using highly sensitive auditory measures. Histories of PE tube surgery were significantly related to EHF hearing and to a range of physiologic measures in the combined sample.

Objectives: To study normative thresholds and latencies for click and tone-burst auditory brainstem response (TB-ABR) for air and bone conduction in normal infants and those discharged from neonatal intensive care units, who passed newborn hearing screening and follow-up distortion product otoacoustic emission. An evoked potential system (Vivosonic Integrity) that incorporates Bluetooth electrical isolation and Kalman-weighted adaptive processing to improve signal to noise ratios was employed for this study. Results were compared with other published data. Design: One hundred forty-five infants who passed two-stage hearing screening with transient-evoked otoacoustic emission or automated auditory brainstem response were assessed with clicks at 70 dB nHL and threshold TB-ABR. Tone bursts at frequencies between 500 and 4000 Hz were used for air and bone conduction auditory brainstem response testing using a specified staircase threshold search to establish threshold levels and wave V peak latencies. Results: Median air conduction hearing thresholds using TB-ABR ranged from 0 to 20 dB nHL, depending on stimulus frequency. Median bone conduction thresholds were 10 dB nHL across all frequencies, and median air-bone gaps were 0 dB across all frequencies. There was no significant threshold difference between left and right ears and no significant relationship between thresholds and hearing loss risk factors, ethnicity, or gender. Older age was related to decreased latency for air conduction. Compared with previous studies, mean air conduction thresholds were found at slightly lower (better) levels, while bone conduction levels were better at 2000 Hz and higher at 500 Hz. Latency values were longer at 500 Hz than previous studies using other instrumentation. Sleep state did not affect air or bone conduction thresholds. Conclusions: This study demonstrated slightly better wave V thresholds for air conduction than previous infant studies. The differences found in the present study, while statistically significant, were within the test step size of 10 dB. This suggests that threshold responses obtained using the Kalman weighting software were within the range of other published studies using traditional signal averaging, given step-size limitations. Thresholds were not adversely affected by variable sleep states.