Background: Haptics‐enhanced virtual reality (VR‐haptic) simulation in dental education has evolved considerably during the past decade, representing a promising resource of simulation‐based training opportunities to support conventional practice. We aim to summarize current literature on the applications of VR‐haptics in learning, practicing, and teaching dental education.Methods: A literature search was performed using PubMed, focusing on research articles published between January 2010 and January 2024. Out of the 667 articles that matched the search terms (dentistry, education, haptic, teaching, training, virtual reality), 105 were screened, and 42 were eligible for full‐text reading and utilization. Findings from an ongoing educator survey on the use of VR‐haptics in dental education have also been provided.Results: VR‐haptic simulation has been shown to have a supportive role in dental simulation practice. Despite training within a digital world, hand skill transfer to the real world has been demonstrated, which affords educators more flexibility in how to train their students before and during traditional preclinical and clinical practical education. The individualized VR‐haptic training and feedback help students in mastering essential working techniques, while also increasing engagement and motivation.Conclusions: VR‐haptics‐supported dental education can help students effectively address challenges during their preclinical and clinical training, as well as in their subsequent careers, and it may help mitigate some weaknesses of the current educational system. Validation is a key factor for the acceptance of VR‐haptic simulators; thus, further research and verification are needed before VR‐haptics could be considered a primary hand skill development method of learning in dental education. VR‐haptic simulation may in the future be used as an assessment tool for the students’ and clinicians’ credentialing process.

Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the influence of virtual reality (VR) haptic simulators on manual dexterity, self‐confidence and stress levels of 3rd‐semester dental students during preclinical endodontic training, as well as to determine the optimal timing for their introduction into the curriculum—before or after training with artificial teeth. Methodology: Forty volunteered dental students enrolled in preclinical endodontic training were randomly divided into two groups. Group 1 (VR Haptic Simulator group, n = 20) completed four sessions with VR haptic simulators, including three training sessions followed by an evaluation session, before practicing on artificial teeth, whilst Group 2 (Control group, n = 20) performed a single attempt on artificial teeth first followed by the identical VR haptic simulator training period as Group 1. Prior to the training sessions, both groups received standardized lectures and demonstrations on access cavity preparation. Pre‐ and post‐training evaluations included stress levels measured via a visual analog scale (VAS) at different phases, assessment of manual dexterity through preclinical training with artificial teeth performance scores, and self‐confidence surveys. Statistical analyses were conducted with significance set at p < .05. Results: Group 1 demonstrated significantly higher manual dexterity scores and self‐assessed proficiency compared to Group 2 ( p < .05). Stress levels, measured via VAS, were notably reduced following simulator practice in both groups, with Group 1 reporting lower anxiety levels during preclinical training with artificial teeth sessions ( p < .05). Simulator‐based performance metrics were comparable between the groups ( p > .05). Self‐confidence surveys indicated that Group 1 felt better prepared and more confident in performing access cavity preparations and managing procedural challenges. Conclusion: The integration of VR haptic simulators before preclinical training with artificial teeth has a positive effect on students' manual dexterity along with reduced stress and increased self‐confidence in clinical skills. Further research is needed to explore long‐term effects and optimal integration strategies for VR simulators in dental curricula.

This study aimed to compare the syringe-needle irrigation (SNI), passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI), EDDY, and shock wave–enhanced emission photoacoustic streaming (SWEEPS) techniques regarding calcium hydroxide and double antibiotic paste removal from the root canal in regenerative endodontic treatments. Eighty single-rooted human teeth were decoronated and enlarged up to #100 to stimulate the immature tooth model. Root canals were irrigated with 1.5% sodium hypochlorite followed by saline solution according to the regenerative endodontic treatment protocol. Dressed teeth were divided into 2 main groups regarding the used intracanal medicaments. Calcium hydroxide and double antibiotic paste were introduced to the canals, and teeth were stored for 3 weeks. Each medicament group was divided into 4 subgroups according to the activation techniques. Medicaments were removed using a 17% EDTA solution. Teeth were split longitudinally into two parts. The remaining medicaments were evaluated under a stereo microscope with a scoring system. Data were analyzed with the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests. Regardless of the used irrigation activation systems, there was no statistically significant difference between the removal of the CH and DAP from the root canal (P>0.05). While SWEEPS had the highest ability regarding the removal of intracanal medicaments, syringe-needle irrigation had the lowest (P0.05). Complete removal of intracanal medicaments could not be achieved with any techniques. SWEEPS technology was more effective in removing intracanal medicaments in regenerative endodontic treatments compared to the sonic and ultrasonic irrigation activation systems.

Objectives: The impact of conservative instrumentation on the disinfection of root canals with different curvatures has not yet been determined. This ex vivo study aimed to evaluate and compare the effect of conservative instrumentation with TruNatomy (TN) and Rotate and a conventional rotary system, ProTaper Gold (PTG), on root canal disinfection during chemomechanical preparation of straight and curved canals. Materials and methods: Ninety mandibular molars with straight (n = 45) and curved (n = 45) mesiobuccal root canals were contaminated with polymicrobial clinical samples. Teeth were divided into three subgroups (n = 14) according to the file systems and the curvature. Canals were instrumented with TN, Rotate, and PTG, respectively. Sodium hypochlorite and EDTA were used as irrigants. Intracanal samples were taken before (S1) and after (S2) instrumentation. Six uninfected teeth were used as negative controls. The bacterial reduction between S1 and S2 was measured by ATP assay, flow cytometry, and culture methods. Kruskal–Wallis and ANOVA tests were followed by the Duncan post hoc test (p < 0.05). Results: Bacterial reduction percentages were similar for the three file systems in straight canals (p > 0.05). However, PTG showed a lower reduction percentage of intact membrane cells in flow cytometry than TN and Rotate (p = 0.036). For the curved canals, no significant differences were obtained (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Conservative instrumentation of straight and curved canals using TN and Rotate files resulted in similar bacterial reduction compared to PTG. Clinical relevance: The disinfection efficacy of conservative instrumentation is similar to conventional instrumentation in straight and curved root canals.

Developments in materials and techniques, geographical locations, age, specialty, and affiliations of dental practitioners affect the preference of post-endodontic restoration. Thus, this survey aimed to evaluate the trends of dentists in Turkey in terms of post-endodontic restorations. An anonymous survey containing 10 questions regarding demographics, post-endodontic restoration patterns, and factors affecting restoration selection was electronically delivered to the dentists registered in the database of the Turkish Dental Association. The data were analyzed using by a chi-square test and ordinal logistic regression analysis. A total of 1093 surveys from 20,564 participants were collected with a response rate of 5.3%. Half of the participants (52%) preferred composite resins for post-endodontic restorations. Usage of posts was less prevalent amongst prosthodontists and dentists with clinical experience of more than 20 years compared to endodontists (p < 0.001) and dentists with clinical experience of less than 5 years (p = 0.004). More than half of the participants (56%) utilized fiber posts. Composite resins and fiber posts were the most common preferences in post-endodontic restoration. Endodontists had a higher tendency to use posts than prosthodontists and general dental practitioners.

Usta SN, et al. Restor Dent Endod. 2023 Oct;48:e34. https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2023.48.e34