Objectives: The impact of conservative instrumentation on the disinfection of root canals with different curvatures has not yet been determined. This ex vivo study aimed to evaluate and compare the effect of conservative instrumentation with TruNatomy (TN) and Rotate and a conventional rotary system, ProTaper Gold (PTG), on root canal disinfection during chemomechanical preparation of straight and curved canals. Materials and methods: Ninety mandibular molars with straight (n = 45) and curved (n = 45) mesiobuccal root canals were contaminated with polymicrobial clinical samples. Teeth were divided into three subgroups (n = 14) according to the file systems and the curvature. Canals were instrumented with TN, Rotate, and PTG, respectively. Sodium hypochlorite and EDTA were used as irrigants. Intracanal samples were taken before (S1) and after (S2) instrumentation. Six uninfected teeth were used as negative controls. The bacterial reduction between S1 and S2 was measured by ATP assay, flow cytometry, and culture methods. Kruskal–Wallis and ANOVA tests were followed by the Duncan post hoc test (p < 0.05). Results: Bacterial reduction percentages were similar for the three file systems in straight canals (p > 0.05). However, PTG showed a lower reduction percentage of intact membrane cells in flow cytometry than TN and Rotate (p = 0.036). For the curved canals, no significant differences were obtained (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Conservative instrumentation of straight and curved canals using TN and Rotate files resulted in similar bacterial reduction compared to PTG. Clinical relevance: The disinfection efficacy of conservative instrumentation is similar to conventional instrumentation in straight and curved root canals.

The relative citation rate (RCR) is a normalized article-level metric useful to assess the impact of research articles. The objective of this bibliometric study is to identify and analyze, in root canal disinfection, the 100 articles having the highest RCRs in the period 1990–2019, then compare them with the top 100 articles most cited. A cross-sectional study was performed, and the search strategy ((Disinfection AND root canal) AND ((“1990/01/01”[Date-Publication]: “2019/12/31”[Date-Publication]))) relied on PubMed (n = 4294 documents), and article data were downloaded from the iCite database. The 100 articles with the highest RCRs and the top 100 cited were selected and evaluated in bibliometric terms. Among the 100 articles with the highest RCRs, there were no differences in the three decades for RCRs values, but there were in citations, being 2000–2009 the most cited. The USA was the predominant country (n = 30), followed by Brazil (n = 14). The most frequent study designs were reviews (n = 27) and in vitro (n = 25) and ex vivo (n = 24) studies. All subfields were well represented, although they varied over time. In 2010–2019, regenerative procedures and irrigation/disinfection techniques were predominant. Considering the RCR’s top 100 articles, 76 were common with the 100 most cited articles. Using the RCR metric allowed us to identify influential articles in root canal disinfection, a research field with topics of significance that fluctuate over time. Compared to citations, RCR reduces the time from publication to detection of its importance for the readership and could be a valid alternative to citation counts.

Biodentine (BD) is a bioactive material with many indications in endodontic therapy. The purpose of this study was to compile and review the outcomes of in vitro and in vivo studies of BD in terms of antimicrobial effectiveness. An electronic search was carried out in PubMed, from January 2009-April 2021 using the keywords: (Biodentine or dentine substitute or “Ca₃SiO₅” or tricalcium silicate cement or bioceramic cement) and (antimicrobial activity or antimicrobial effect or antimicrobial effectiveness or antibacterial activity or antibacterial effect or antibacterial effectiveness or antibiofilm activity or antibiofilm effectiveness). Two independent reviewers evaluated the studies for eligibility. All studies that did not include BD or its antimicrobial properties, as well as abstracts not written in English, were excluded. This review identified the need to develop standardized methods to evaluate antimicrobial activity in vitro. Most of the studies were against planktonic bacteria and gave conflicting results. Studies ex vivo and in vivo against biofilm are required to elucidate the antimicrobial activity of BD.

Persistent infections have become a challenge in dentistry because of growing antibiotic resistance. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) appear to be a therapeutic alternative to control biofilm infection. The objective of this work is to evaluate the antimicrobial activity and cytotoxicity of sodium diclofenac (DCS), ibuprofen (IBP) and ibuprofen arginine (IBP-arginine) solutions against endodontic polymicrobial biofilms. Sterile radicular dentin blocks of 4 mm × 4 mm × 0.7 mm were used as substrate to grow biofilm. The dentin blocks were submerged into solutions for 5 min. The antimicrobial activity was evaluated by means of the adenosine triphosphate (ATP) assay and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). Fibroblasts 3T3-L1 (ECACC 86052701) were used to test the cytotoxicity of irrigating solutions. The antibiofilm effects determined by the ATP assay showed that 4% IBP-arginine solution exerted the highest antibiofilm activity, followed by 4% DCS and 4% IBP, with statistical differences among groups (p < 0.001). As for CLSM, 4% DCS and 4% IBP-arginine solutions gave the lowest viable cell percentages, without significant differences between them. Cytotoxicity results at 1/10 dilution were similar for all solutions. At 1/100 dilution, a 4% DCS solution obtained the lowest cell viability for both time periods assayed, 1 h and 24 h. The IBP-arginine group showed the highest cell viability at 24 h. In this preliminary study, in terms of antibiofilm activity and cytotoxicity, a mixed 4% IBP-arginine solution gave the most promising results. NSAID solutions could be recommendable drugs for endodontic disinfection procedures.