Purpose: To assess the safety and tolerability of BMS-986148, a mesothelin-directed antibody–drug conjugate (ADC) ± nivolumab, in patients with selected tumors. Patients and Methods: In an international phase I/IIa study [NCT02341625 (CA008-002)], patients received BMS-986148 monotherapy (0.1–1.6 mg/kg intravenously (i.v.) every 3 weeks or 0.4 or 0.6 mg/kg i.v. once weekly; n = 96) or BMS-986148 0.8 mg/kg + nivolumab 360 mg i.v. every 3 weeks (n = 30). The primary endpoint was safety and tolerability. Results: In CA008-002, the most common (≥ 10%) treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) included increased aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, and alkaline phosphatase. Grade 3/4 TRAEs occurred in 42 patients (49%) receiving BMS-986148 every 3 weeks monotherapy, three (25%) receiving BMS-986148 once-weekly monotherapy, and 10 (33%) receiving BMS-986148 + nivolumab every 3 weeks. Overall, 17 of 126 patients (13%) discontinued because of a TRAE. The MTD of BMS-986148 was 1.2 mg/kg i.v. every 3 weeks. The safety profile of BMS-986148 + nivolumab was similar to that of BMS-986148 monotherapy (0.8 mg/kg). Active ADC exposures increased in a dose-proportional manner with both dosing regimens (every 3 weeks and once weekly). Preliminary clinical activity was observed with BMS-986148 ± nivolumab. No association between mesothelin expression and response was detected. Conclusions: BMS-986148 ± nivolumab demonstrated a clinically manageable safety profile and preliminary evidence of clinical activity, supporting additional studies combining directed cytotoxic therapies with checkpoint inhibitors as potential multimodal therapeutic strategies in patients with advanced solid tumors.

PURPOSE: The investigation of multiple molecular targets with next-generation sequencing (NGS) has entered clinical practice in oncology, yielding to a paradigm shift from the histology-centric approach to the mutational model for personalized treatment. Accordingly, most of the drugs recently approved in oncology are coupled to specific biomarkers. One potential tool for implementing the mutational model of precision oncology in daily practice is represented by the Molecular Tumor Board (MTB), a multidisciplinary team whereby molecular pathologists, biologists, bioinformaticians, geneticists, medical oncologists, and pharmacists cooperate to generate, interpret, and match molecular data with personalized treatments. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Since May 2020, the institutional MTB set at Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori of Milan met weekly via teleconference to discuss molecular data and potential therapeutic options for patients with advanced/metastatic solid tumors. RESULTS: Up to October 2021, among 1,996 patients evaluated, we identified >10,000 variants, 43.2% of which were functionally relevant (pathogenic or likely pathogenic). On the basis of functionally relevant variants, 711 patients (35.6%) were potentially eligible to targeted therapy according to European Society of Medical Oncology Scale for Clinical Actionability of Molecular Targets tiers, and 9.4% received a personalized treatment. Overall, larger NGS panels (containing >50 genes) significantly outperformed small panels (up to 50 genes) in detecting actionable gene targets across different tumor types. CONCLUSION: Our real-world data provide evidence that MTB is a valuable tool for matching NGS data with targeted treatments, eventually implementing precision oncology in clinical practice.

This first-in-human (FIH), phase I, multicenter, open-label study was conducted to characterize the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary efficacy, and to establish the MTD/recommended dose for expansion (RDE) of PCA062 in patients with solid tumors. Adult patients with any solid tumor type and having a documented P-cadherin–positive tumor were enrolled; exceptions to P-cadherin positivity requirement were head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC) and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Dose escalation was guided by an adaptive Bayesian logistic regression model with escalation with overdose control to determine the MTD/RDE. Forty-seven patients were treated at 10 different dose levels of PCA062, ranging from 0.4 to 5.0 mg/kg every 2 weeks administered as a 1-hour intravenous infusion. All enrolled patients discontinued the treatment; primary reason for discontinuation was progressive disease (78.7%). All 47 patients experienced at least one AE, of which 32 patients had a grade ≥3 AE and 37 patients experienced AEs suspected to be study drug related. The MTD of PCA062 was 3.6 mg/kg every 2 weeks and thrombocytopenia was reported as a DLT that was attributed to the known toxicities of the DM1 payload with no P-cadherin–related toxicities. Pharmacokinetics was proportional, and no patients developed antidrug antibodies, suggesting adequate exposure at the doses tested. One patient of 47 achieved a partial response and there was no correlation between tumor P-cadherin expression and clinical efficacy. Because of limited antitumor activity at the MTD level, Novartis has terminated clinical development of PCA062 (NCT02375958).

PURPOSE: The Molecular Tumor Board (MTB) is an important tool for the selection of molecularly targeted agents (MTAs), but its clinical utility is unconfirmed in real-world practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We explored the clinical relevance of MTAs in patients discussed by the MTB of the National Cancer Institute of Milan. Patients were stratified into eligible (ie, at least one actionable molecular alteration identified) and treated with MTA (group A), eligible but not treated (group B), or not eligible (group C). Cases for whom a European Society for Medical Oncology Scale for Clinical Actionability of Molecular Targets IA tier target was identified were excluded from this analysis and managed as per clinical practice. The study end points were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and PFSratio, defined as PFS on MTA/PFS on the last previous treatment in group A. RESULTS: As of November 2022, 1,813 cases were discussed, of which 458 (25.2%) were potentially eligible to MTA and 117 (6.4%) started treatment. The median PFS on MTA was 12.0 months and the median PFSratio in patients receiving MTA as >1 line of treatment was 2.71, with a benefit rate of 64%. OS was significantly longer in group A than in B and C metastatic patients (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.21 and 1.71 in group B and C, respectively; P < .001). CONCLUSION: Efforts should be pursued to offer MTB-driven therapies, as eligible patients who did not receive MTA showed a significantly poorer prognosis.

Aim: Diagnostic laboratories are progressively introducing next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies in the routine workflow to meet the increasing clinical need for comprehensive molecular characterization in cancer patients for diagnosis and precision medicine, including fusion-transcripts detection. Nevertheless, the low quality of messenger RNA (mRNA) extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples may affect the transition from traditional single-gene testing approaches [like fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), immunohistochemistry (IHC), or polymerase chain reaction (PCR)] to NGS. The present study is aimed at assessing the overall accuracy of RNA fusion transcripts detection by NGS analysis in FFPE samples in real-world diagnostics. Methods: Herein, NGS data from 190 soft tissue tumors (STTs) and carcinoma cases, discussed in the context of the institutional Molecular Tumor Board, are reported and analyzed by FusionPlex© Solid tumor kit through the manufacturer’s pipeline and by two well-known fast and accurate open-source tools [Arriba (ARR) and spliced transcripts alignment to reference (STAR)-fusion (SFU)]. Results: The combination of FusionPlex© Solid tumor with ArcherDX® Analysis suite (ADx) analysis package has been proven to be sensitive and specific in STT samples, while partial loss of sensitivity has been found in carcinoma specimens. Conclusions: Albeit ARR and SFU showed lower sensitivity, the use of additional fusion-detection tools can contribute to reinforcing or extending the output obtained by ADx, particularly in the case of low-quality input data. Overall, our results sustain the clinical use of NGS for the detection of fusion transcripts in FFPE material.

This phase 1 trial (NCT01938846) determined the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the mTOR serine/threonine kinase inhibitor, BI 860585, as monotherapy and with exemestane or paclitaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors. This 3+3 dose-escalation study assessed BI 860585 monotherapy (5–300 mg/day; Arm A), BI 860585 (40–220 mg/day; Arm B) with 25 mg/day exemestane, and BI 860585 (80–220 mg/day; Arm C) with 60–80 mg/m²/week paclitaxel, in 28-day cycles. Primary endpoints were the number of patients with dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) in cycle 1 and the MTD. Forty-one, 25, and 24 patients were treated (Arms A, B, and C). DLTs were observed in four (rash (n = 2), elevated alanine aminotransferase/aspartate aminotransferase, diarrhea), four (rash (n = 3), stomatitis, and increased gamma-glutamyl transferase), and two (diarrhea, increased blood creatine phosphokinase) patients in cycle 1. The BI 860585 MTD was 220 mg/day (Arm A) and 160 mg/day (Arms B and C). Nine patients achieved an objective response (Arm B: Four partial responses (PRs); Arm C: Four PRs; one complete response). The disease control rate was 20%, 28%, and 58% (Arms A, B, and C). The most frequent treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were hyperglycemia (54%) and diarrhea (39%) (Arm A); diarrhea (40%) and stomatitis (40%) (Arm B); fatigue (58%) and diarrhea (58%) (Arm C). The MTD was determined in all arms. Antitumor activity was observed with BI 860585 monotherapy and in combination with exemestane or paclitaxel.