Pierrick Haffray

Dr. Pierrick Haffray

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

33Years (1994-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 August 2009 in Aquaculture
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FPFrancesc Piferrer
Francesc Piferrer
ABAndy Beaumont
Andy Beaumont
JFJean-Claude Falguière
Jean-Claude Falguière
MFMartin Flajšhans
Martin Flajšhans
PHPierrick Haffray
Pierrick Haffray
LCLorenzo Colombo
Lorenzo Colombo

2 March 2016 in Aquaculture International
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ACAquatrace Consortium
Aquatrace Consortium
HCHervé Chavanne
Hervé Chavanne
KJKasper Janssen
Kasper Janssen
JHJohann Hofherr
Johann Hofherr
FCFranca Contini
Franca Contini
LBLuca Bargelloni
Luca Bargelloni

12 December 2014 in Frontiers in Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MVMarc Vandeputte
Marc Vandeputte
PHPierrick Haffray
Pierrick Haffray
Since the middle of the 1990s, parentage assignment using microsatellite markers has been introduced as a tool in aquaculture breeding. It now allows close to 100% assignment success, and offered new ways to develop aquaculture breeding using mixed family designs in industry conditions. Its main achievements are the knowledge and control of family representation and inbreeding, especially in mass spawning species, above all the capacity to estimate reliable genetic parameters in any species and rearing system with no prior investment in structures, and the development of new breeding programs in many species. Parentage assignment should not be seen as a way to replace physical tagging, but as a new way to conceive breeding programs, which have to be optimized with its specific constraints, one of the most important being to well define the number of individuals to genotype to limit costs, maximize genetic gain while minimizing inbreeding. The recent possible shift to (for the moment) more costly SNP markers should benefit from future developments in genomics and MAS selection to combine parentage assignment and indirect prediction of breeding values.

1 March 2008 in Aquaculture
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MDMathilde Dupont-Nivet
Mathilde Dupont-Nivet
MVMarc Vandeputte
Marc Vandeputte
AVAlain Vergnet
Alain Vergnet
OMOlivier Merdy
Olivier Merdy
PHPierrick Haffray
Pierrick Haffray
BCBéatrice Chatain
Béatrice Chatain

6 June 2019 in Genetics Selection Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JDJonathan D’AMbrosio
Jonathan D’AMbrosio
FPFlorence Phocas
Florence Phocas
PHPierrick Haffray
Pierrick Haffray
ABAnastasia Bestin
Anastasia Bestin
SBSophie Brard-Fudulea
Sophie Brard-Fudulea
MDMathilde Dupont-Nivet
Mathilde Dupont-Nivet
Selective breeding is a relatively recent practice in aquaculture species compared to terrestrial livestock. Nevertheless, the genetic variability of farmed salmonid lines, which have been selected for several generations, should be assessed. Indeed, a significant decrease in genetic variability due to high selection intensity could have occurred, potentially jeopardizing the long-term genetic progress as well as the adaptive capacities of populations facing change(s) in the environment. Thus, it is important to evaluate the impact of selection practices on genetic diversity to limit future inbreeding. The current study presents an analysis of genetic diversity within and between six French rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) experimental or commercial lines based on a medium-density single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) chip and various molecular genetic indicators: fixation index (FST), linkage disequilibrium (LD), effective population size (Ne) and inbreeding coefficient derived from runs of homozygosity (ROH). Our results showed a moderate level of genetic differentiation between selected lines (FST ranging from 0.08 to 0.15). LD declined rapidly over the first 100 kb, but then remained quite high at long distances, leading to low estimates of Ne in the last generation ranging from 24 to 68 depending on the line and methodology considered. These results were consistent with inbreeding estimates that varied from 10.0% in an unselected experimental line to 19.5% in a commercial line, and which are clearly higher than corresponding estimates in ruminants or pigs. In addition, strong variations in LD and inbreeding were observed along the genome that may be due to differences in local rates of recombination or due to key genes that tended to have fixed favorable alleles for domestication or production. This is the first report on ROH for any aquaculture species. Inbreeding appeared to be moderate to high in the six French rainbow trout lines, due to founder effects at the start of the breeding programs, but also likely to sweepstakes reproductive success in addition to selection for the selected lines. Efficient management of inbreeding is a major goal in breeding programs to ensure that populations can adapt to future breeding objectives and SNP information can be used to manage the rate at which inbreeding builds up in the fish genome.

1 November 2001 in Aquaculture
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ESEric Saillant
Eric Saillant
AFAlexis Fostier
Alexis Fostier
BMBruno Menu
Bruno Menu
PHPierrick Haffray
Pierrick Haffray
BCBéatrice Chatain
Béatrice Chatain