Reinhard Koch

Prof. Dr. Reinhard Koch

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

34Years (1993-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2004 in International Journal of Computer Vision
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MPMarc Pollefeys
Marc Pollefeys
LGLuc Van Gool
Luc Van Gool
Maarten VergauwenMaarten Vergauwen
Maarten Vergauwen
FVFrank Verbiest
Frank Verbiest
KCKurt Cornelis
Kurt Cornelis
RKReinhard Koch
Reinhard Koch

1 October 2013 in Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LZLilian Zhang
Lilian Zhang
RKReinhard Koch
Reinhard Koch

1 August 1999 in International Journal of Computer Vision
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MPMarc Pollefeys
Marc Pollefeys
RKReinhard Koch
Reinhard Koch
LGLuc Van Gool
Luc Van Gool

8 February 2010 in Computer Graphics Forum
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AKAndreas Kolb
Andreas Kolb
EBE. Barth
E. Barth
RKReinhard Koch
Reinhard Koch
RLR. Larsen
R. Larsen

27 November 2002
Verified
Conference Paper
Closed access
MPM. Pollefeys
M. Pollefeys
RKReinhard Koch
Reinhard Koch
LGL. Van Gool
L. Van Gool
In this paper the feasibility of self-calibration in the presence of varying internal camera parameters is under investigation. A self-calibration method is presented which efficiently deals with all kinds of constraints on the internal camera parameters. Within this framework a practical method is proposed which can retrieve metric reconstruction from image sequences obtained with uncalibrated zooming/focusing cameras. The feasibility of the approach is illustrated on real and synthetic examples.

27 May 2021 in IEEE Access
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
LSLars Schmarje
Lars Schmarje
MSMonty Santarossa
Monty Santarossa
SSSimon-Martin Schröder
Simon-Martin Schröder
RKReinhard Koch
Reinhard Koch
While deep learning strategies achieve outstanding results in computer vision tasks, one issue remains: The current strategies rely heavily on a huge amount of labeled data. In many real-world problems, it is not feasible to create such an amount of labeled training data. Therefore, it is common to incorporate unlabeled data into the training process to reach equal results with fewer labels. Due to a lot of concurrent research, it is difficult to keep track of recent developments. In this survey, we provide an overview of often used ideas and methods in image classification with fewer labels. We compare 34 methods in detail based on their performance and their commonly used ideas rather than a fine-grained taxonomy. In our analysis, we identify three major trends that lead to future research opportunities. 1. State-of-the-art methods are scalable to real-world applications in theory but issues like class imbalance, robustness, or fuzzy labels are not considered. 2. The degree of supervision which is needed to achieve comparable results to the usage of all labels is decreasing and therefore methods need to be extended to settings with a variable number of classes. 3. All methods share some common ideas but we identify clusters of methods that do not share many ideas. We show that combining ideas from different clusters can lead to better performance.