Mallika Sengupta

Dr. Mallika Sengupta

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2017 in Indian Journal of Urology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SBSayantan Banerjee
Sayantan Banerjee
MSMallika Sengupta
Mallika Sengupta
TSTanoy Kumer Sarker
Tanoy Kumer Sarker
Introduction: Urinary tract infection (UTI) is one of the most common infectious diseases. With the emergence of multidrug resistance (MDR), therapeutic options for treatment of UTIs are becoming limited. Fosfomycin has emerged as a novel oral therapeutic option with bactericidal activity against the MDR uropathogens. We evaluated the susceptibility pattern of uropathogens to this antibiotic. Methods: A prospective study was conducted for 6 months in a tertiary care hospital in Eastern India to evaluate whether the common uropathogens were susceptible to fosfomycin. Identification of organisms causing significant bacteriuria was done by conventional biochemical and VITEK 2 Compact System™. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed against these pathogens by Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method. Minimum inhibitory concentrations were measured for certain drugs by E-strips and VITEK 2 Compact System. Results: A total of 2229 urine samples were referred for culture during the study period, which yielded 356 significant bacterial isolates. Among these isolates, 64.78% were extended-spectrum beta-lactamases producers, 15.97% were carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, and 42.7% isolates were found to be MDR Enterobacteriaceae (MDRE). However, 95.18% of the total isolates and 95.93% of MDRE were found to be susceptible to fosfomycin. Conclusion: The common uropathogens, including MDR isolates, show high in vitro susceptibility to fosfomycin, which therefore has the potential to emerge as a promising alternative oral agent for outpatient therapy of UTIs.

7 September 2021 in Antibiotics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MSMallika Sengupta
Mallika Sengupta
SSSOMA SARKAR
SOMA SARKAR
MSManideepa Sengupta
Manideepa Sengupta
SGSougata Ghosh
Sougata Ghosh
RSRiya Sarkar
Riya Sarkar
PBParthajit Banerjee
Parthajit Banerjee
Background: Enterococcus is an important cause of infection in the hospital as well as in the community. Methods: A prospective study was done in Medical College, Kolkata for a period of 2 years (from January 2018 to December 2019). After obtaining clearance from the Institutional Ethics Committee, Enterococcus isolates from cases of vaginitis were included in the study. Identification of Enterococcus species was done by Gram stain and conventional biochemical tests along with automated identification by VITEK 2 Compact. These isolates were tested for antimicrobial susceptibility to different antibiotics by Kirby Bauer disc diffusion method and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) by VITEK 2 Compact. Interpretation of susceptibility was done according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) 2017 guidelines. Biofilm detection for Enterococcus species was done. Results: During the period of 2 years, 39 isolates of Enterococcus spp. were obtained from vaginitis cases. Among these, 27 were Enterococcus faecalis and 12 Enterococcus faecium. All isolates were highly susceptible to vancomycin, teicoplanin, and linezolid. Biofilm was detected in eight isolates of which five were strong biofilm producer and three moderate biofilm producers. Conclusion: Biofilm production is an important virulence factor in Enterococcus isolates from vaginitis.

2 March 2023 in Diagnostics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MSMallika Sengupta
Mallika Sengupta
RSRiya Sarkar
Riya Sarkar
SSSOMA SARKAR
SOMA SARKAR
MSManideepa Sengupta
Manideepa Sengupta
SGSougata Ghosh
Sougata Ghosh
PBParthajit Banerjee
Parthajit Banerjee
Introduction: There is increasing development of antibiotic resistance among the Enterococcus species. Objectives: This study was performed to determine prevalence and characterize the vancomycin-resistant and linezolid-resistant enterococcus isolates from a tertiary care center. Moreover, the antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of these isolates was also determined. Materials and Methods: A prospective study was performed in Medical College, Kolkata, India, over a period of two years (from January 2018 to December 2019). After obtaining clearance from the Institutional Ethics Committee, Enterococcus isolates from various samples were included in the present investigation. In addition to the various conventional biochemical tests, the VITEK 2 Compact system was used to identify the Enterococcus species. The isolates were tested for antimicrobial susceptibility to different antibiotics using the Kirby–Bauer disk diffusion method and VITEK 2 Compact to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) 2017 guidelines were used to interpret susceptibility. Multiplex PCR was performed for genetic characterization of the vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus isolates and sequencing was performed for characterization of the linezolid-resistant Enterococcus isolates. Results: During the period of two years, 371 isolates of Enterococcus spp. were obtained from 4934 clinical isolates showing a prevalence of 7.52%. Among these isolates, 239 (64.42%) were Enterococcus faecalis, 114 (30.72%) Enterococcus faecium, and others were Enterococcus durans, Enterococcus casseliflavus, Enterococcus gallinarum, and Enterococcus avium. Among these, 24 (6.47%) were VRE (Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus) of which 18 isolates were Van A type and six isolates of Enterococcus casseliflavus and Enterococcus gallinarum were resistant VanC type. There were two linezolid-resistant Enterococcus, and they were found to have the G2576T mutation. Among the 371 isolates, 252 (67.92%) were multi-drug resistant. Conclusion: This study found an increasing prevalence of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus isolates. There is also an alarming prevalence of multidrug resistance among these isolates.

1 January 2016 in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MSMallika Sengupta
Mallika Sengupta
SBSayantan Banerjee
Sayantan Banerjee
PBPritam Banerjee
Pritam Banerjee
PGPartha Guchhait
Partha Guchhait
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research aims to publish findings of doctors at grass root level and post graduate students, so that all unique medical experiences are recorded in literature.

18 November 2022 in Cureus
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PPPritha Pramanick
Pritha Pramanick
MSMallika Sengupta
Mallika Sengupta
MBMadhumita Banerjee
Madhumita Banerjee
SGSougata Ghosh
Sougata Ghosh
AMAnita Nandi Mitra
Anita Nandi Mitra
MSManideepa Sengupta
Manideepa Sengupta
Corneal ulcer or keratitis is defined as a loss of corneal epithelium with underlying stromal infiltration and suppuration associated with signs of inflammation. Corneal blindness is a significant public health problem worldwide; infectious keratitis is one of the predominant preventable causes of blindness. Several studies have evaluated microbial infectious keratitis's etiology, management, and outcome. However, there are regional variations in corneal ulcers' prevalence, risk factors, and outcome. The objective of this study was to isolate and identify the bacterial, fungal, viral, and protozoal etiological organisms causing infectious corneal ulcers along with their prevalence and antimicrobial sensitivity pattern. A prospective observational study was done in the Department of Microbiology and RIO, Medical College & Hospital, Kolkata, for a period of 1 year (February 2019 to January 2020) after obtaining clearance from the Institutional Ethics Committee. Informed consent, demographic data, history of disease onset, duration of symptoms, associated co-morbidities, etc., were taken from the patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria. Corneal scraping samples were collected sterilely to detect bacterial, fungal, parasitic, and viral isolates and identified by standard laboratory procedures. A total of 80 patients were included in the study. The risk factors included foreign body in 24 (30%), blunt trauma in 10 (12.5%), steroid use in 8 (10%), contact lens user 4 (5%), and spontaneous in 34 (42.5%). Among these 80 patients, 18 showed growth of bacteria, including Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Streptococcus pyogenes, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa; four had growth of fungi, including Aspergillus spp. and Fusarium spp, and two were positive for Herpes simplex virus by IFA. Early diagnosis and prompt keratitis treatment are critical for preventing visual loss. The identification of the various causative agents of keratitis is essential for the proper management of the cases.

1 April 2020 in Journal of Pure and Applied Microbiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
NSNavodeep Saha
Navodeep Saha
MSMallika Sengupta
Mallika Sengupta
SSSoma Sarkar
Soma Sarkar
MSManideepa Sengupta
Manideepa Sengupta