Children affected by genetic conditions often have multisystem disease, experience substantial morbidity and mortality, and have higher hospitalization rates with longer admissions compared with the general pediatric population.^1-3 The evaluation for a genetic condition in a child, the so-called diagnostic odyssey, typically involves clinical assessment and multiple investigations, many of which are invasive and costly. The diagnostic trajectory can be prolonged, and many children continue to have undiagnosed conditions. Each technological advance in genetic analysis offers an opportunity to improve diagnostic yield, as exemplified by chromosomal microarray over conventional karyotyping,⁴ but none has the diagnostic power of genomic sequencing. Whole-exome sequencing (WES), the analysis of the protein-coding exons of genes, has the potential to revolutionize the diagnosis in children suspected of having monogenic disorders.^5,6 Quiz Ref ID Large-scale studies^7-13 of WES in children with broad clinical presentations report diagnostic rates of 25% to 30%, applying WES after multiple genetic investigations, including single-gene or panel testing. Studies using WES as a last resort result in ascertainment bias toward diagnostically difficult cases because children with conditions diagnosed with an earlier gene test would be excluded. The application of WES to a clinically ascertained, sequencing-naive cohort is needed to understand the full impact of WES in the pediatric clinic and to assist clinicians in knowing when and for whom to consider singleton WES.

Background: Most arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are localized and occur sporadically. However, they also can be multifocal in autosomal-dominant disorders, such as hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia and capillary malformation (CM)-AVM. Previously, we identified RASA1 mutations in 50% of patients with CM-AVM. Herein we studied non-RASA1 patients to further elucidate the pathogenicity of CMs and AVMs. Methods: We conducted a genome-wide linkage study on a CM-AVM family. Whole-exome sequencing was also performed on 9 unrelated CM-AVM families. We identified a candidate gene and screened it in a large series of patients. The influence of several missense variants on protein function was also studied in vitro. Results: We found evidence for linkage in 2 loci. Whole-exome sequencing data unraveled 4 distinct damaging variants in EPHB4 in 5 families that cosegregated with CM-AVM. Overall, screening of EPHB4 detected 47 distinct mutations in 54 index patients: 27 led to a premature stop codon or splice-site alteration, suggesting loss of function. The other 20 are nonsynonymous variants that result in amino acid substitutions. In vitro expression of several mutations confirmed loss of function of EPHB4. The clinical features included multifocal CMs, telangiectasias, and AVMs. Conclusions: We found EPHB4 mutations in patients with multifocal CMs associated with AVMs. The phenotype, CM-AVM2, mimics RASA1 -related CM-AVM1 and also hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia. RASA1 -encoded p120RASGAP is a direct effector of EPHB4. Our data highlight the pathogenetic importance of this interaction and indicts EPHB4-RAS-ERK signaling pathway as a major cause for AVMs.

Capillary malformation–arteriovenous malformation (CM–AVM) is an autosomal‐dominant disorder, caused by heterozygous RASA1 mutations, and manifesting multifocal CMs and high risk for fast‐flow lesions. A limited number of patients have been reported, raising the question of the phenotypic borders. We identified new patients with a clinical diagnosis of CM–AVM, and patients with overlapping phenotypes. RASA1 was screened in 261 index patients with: CM–AVM (n = 100), common CM(s) (port‐wine stain; n = 100), Sturge–Weber syndrome (n = 37), or isolated AVM(s) (n = 24). Fifty‐eight distinct RASA1 mutations (43 novel) were identified in 68 index patients with CM–AVM and none in patients with other phenotypes. A novel clinical feature was identified: cutaneous zones of numerous small white pale halos with a central red spot. An additional question addressed in this study was the “second‐hit” hypothesis as a pathophysiological mechanism for CM–AVM. One tissue from a patient with a germline RASA1 mutation was available. The analysis of the tissue showed loss of the wild‐type RASA1 allele. In conclusion, mutations in RASA1 underscore the specific CM–AVM phenotype and the clinical diagnosis is based on identifying the characteristic CMs. The high incidence of fast‐flow lesions warrants careful clinical and radiologic examination, and regular follow‐up.