Sugarcane products contribute significantly to the Brazilian economy, generating U.S. $12.2 billion in revenue in 2018. Identifying and monitoring factors that induce yield reduction, such as weed occurrence, is thus imperative. The detection of Bermudagrass in sugarcane crops using remote sensing data, however, is a challenge considering their spectral similarity. To overcome this limitation, this paper aims to explore the potential of texture features derived from images acquired by an optical sensor onboard anunmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) to detect Bermudagrass in sugarcane. Aerial images with a spatial resolution of 2 cm were acquired from a sugarcane field in Brazil. The Green-Red Vegetation Index and several texture metrics derived from the gray-level co-occurrence matrix were calculated to perform an automatic classification using arandom forest algorithm. Adding texture metrics to the classification process improved the overall accuracy from 83.00% to 92.54%, and this improvement was greater considering larger window sizes, since they representeda texture transition between two targets. Production losses induced by Bermudagrass presence reached 12.1 tons × ha⁻¹ in the study site. This study not only demonstrated the capacity of UAV images to overcome the well-known limitation of detecting Bermudagrass in sugarcane crops, but also highlighted the importance of texture for high-accuracy quantification of weed invasion in sugarcane crops.

The monitoring of agricultural activities at a regular basis is crucial to assure that the food production meets the world population demands, which is increasing yearly. Such information can be derived from remote sensing data. In spite of topic’s relevance, not enough efforts have been invested to exploit modern pattern recognition and machine learning methods for agricultural land-cover mapping from multi-temporal, multi-sensor earth observation data. Furthermore, only a small proportion of the works published on this topic relates to tropical/subtropical regions, where crop dynamics is more complicated and difficult to model than in temperate regions. A major hindrance has been the lack of accurate public databases for the comparison of different classification methods. In this context, the aim of the present paper is to share a multi-temporal and multi-sensor benchmark database that can be used by the remote sensing community for agricultural land-cover mapping. Information about crops in situ was collected in Luís Eduardo Magalhães (LEM) municipality, which is an important Brazilian agricultural area, to create field reference data including information about first and second crop harvests. Moreover, a series of remote sensing images was acquired and pre-processed, from both active and passive orbital sensors (Sentinel-1, Sentinel-2/MSI, Landsat-8/OLI), correspondent to the LEM area, along the development of the main annual crops. In this paper, we describe the LEM database (crop field boundaries, land use reference data and pre-processed images) and present the results of an experiment conducted using the Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 data.

Reliable remote sensing-based Land Use and Land Cover (LULC) information is crucial for assessing Earth’s surface activities. Brazil’s agricultural dynamics, including year-round cropping, multiple cropping, and regional climate variability, make LULC monitoring a highly challenging task. The country has thirteen remote sensing-based LULC products specifically tailored for this purpose. However, the differences and the results of these products have not yet been synthesized to provide coherent guidance in assessing their spatio-temporal agricultural dynamics and identifying promising approaches and issues that affect LULC analysis. This review represents the first comprehensive assessment of the advantages, challenges, and limitations, highlighting the main issues when dealing with contrasting LULC maps. These challenges include incompatibility, a lack of updates, non-systematic classification ontologies, and insufficient data to monitor Brazilian LULC information. The consequences include impacts on intercropping estimation, diminished representation or misrepresentation of croplands; temporal discontinuity; an insufficient number of classes for subannual cropping evaluation; and reduced compatibility, comparability, and spectral separability. The study provides insights into the use of these products as primary input data for remote sensing-based applications. Moreover, it provides prospects for enhancing existing mapping efforts or developing new national-level initiatives to represent the spatio-temporal variation of Brazilian agriculture.

Vegetation Indices are important for agricultural monitoring and the assessment of biophysical attributes of different crops. In this context, the objective of this study was to evaluate the relationships between normalized difference vegetation indices (NDVIs) obtained by different terrestrial remote sensors (active and passive), with respect to biophysical aspects of soybeans and beans. With the NDVI GS (GreenSeeker 505 handheld active sensor), it was possible to obtain a better leaf area index and height estimate for both crops, as well chlorophyll index for soybeans. The NDVI FS (FieldSpec4 model Standard-Res passive sensor) is highlight in being able to estimate values for intercepted photosynthetically active radiation, mainly for soybeans. By using NDVIs with active and passive terrestrial remote sensors, it was possible to create models to estimate the biophysical parameters for soybeans and beans.

Predicting crop yield throughout its development cycle is crucial for planning storage, processing, and distribution. Optical remote sensing has been used for yield prediction but has limitations, such as cloud interference and only capturing canopy-level data. Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) complements optical data by capturing information even in cloudy conditions and providing additional plant insights. This study aimed to explore the correlation of SAR variables with soybean yield at different crop stages, testing if SAR data enhances predictions compared to optical data alone. Data from three growing seasons were collected from an area of 106 hectares, using eight SAR variables (Alpha, Entropy, DPSVI, RFDI, Pol, RVI, VH, and VV) and four speckle noise filters. The Random Forest algorithm was applied, combining SAR variables with the EVI optical index. Although none of the SAR variables showed strong correlations with yield (r < |0.35|), predictions improved when SAR data were included. The best performance was achieved using DPSVI with the Boxcar filter, combined with EVI during the maturation stage (with EVI:RMSE = 0.43, 0.49, and 0.60, respectively, for each season; while EVI + DPSVI:RMSE = 0.39, 0.49, and 0.42). Despite improving predictions, the computational demands of SAR processing must be considered, especially when optical data are limited due to cloud cover.

. Satellite imagery, in combination with remote sensing techniques, provides a new opportunity for monitoring and assessing crops with lower cost and greater objectivity than traditional surveys. The present research employed Landsat 5/TM satellite imagery to identify the land cover classes in Cafelândia (Paraná, Brasil), a predominantly agricultural town. Five supervised classification methods (parallelepiped (PL), minimum distance (MND), Mahalanobis distance (MHD), maximum likelihood classifier (MLC) and spectral angle mapper (SAM)) were tested in this work. To assess the efficiency of the classifications, accuracy indices and error metrics obtained through total confusion matrices were used. The results indicated that the Mahalanobis and SAM methods generated the smallest errors for the four studied land use classes (soybean, corn, forest, and bare soil), with overall accuracy values of 88% and 86%, respectively, and kappa index values 0.83 and 0.80, respectively. The values of these methods for the applied metrics were 0.88 and 0.86 for the sensitivity index, 0.96 and 0.95 for the total specificity index and 0.84 and 0.81 for Matthews correlation coefficient, respectively. The different classification methods clearly exhibited large variations in their performance for land cover mapping. The use of measures obtained from the error matrix is a suitable method for comparisons of thematic maps.