Sticky bone, a growth factor-enriched bone graft matrix, is a promising autologous material for bone tissue regeneration. However, its production is strongly dependent on manual handling steps. In this sense, a new device was developed to simplify the confection of the sticky bone, named Sticky Bone Preparation Device (SBPD^®). The purpose of this pilot study was to investigate the suitability of the SBPD^® to prepare biomaterials for bone regeneration with autologous platelet concentrates. The SBPD^® allows the blending of particulate samples from synthetic, xenograft, or autogenous bone with autologous platelet concentrates, making it easy to use and avoiding the need of further manipulations for the combination of the materials. The protocol for the preparation of sticky bone samples using the SBPD^® is described, and the resulting product is compared with hand-mixed SB preparations regarding in vitro parameters such as cell content and the ability to release growth factors and cytokines relevant to tissue regeneration. The entrapped cell content was estimated, and the ability to release biological mediators was assessed after 7 days of incubation in culture medium. Both preparations increased the leukocyte and platelet concentrations compared to whole-blood samples (p < 0.05), without significant differences between SB and SBPD^®. SBPD^® samples released several growth factors, including VEGF, FGFb, and PDGF, at concentrations physiologically equivalent to those released by SB preparations. Therefore, the use of SBPD^® results in a similar product to the standard protocol, but with more straightforward and shorter preparation times and less manipulation. These preliminary results suggest this device as a suitable alternative for combining bone substitute materials with platelet concentrates for bone tissue regeneration.

The case of a 59-year-old woman lacking bone in the lower left side of her mandible, and treated with two different biomaterials for bone regeneration, is reported here. Specifically, two different anatomical sites damaged by two different pathologies were studied: a radicular fracture and peri-implantitis. The sites were treated via xenograft bone substitute and calcium phosphosilicate, respectively. Follow-up evaluations showed that the two different methodologies employing different materials in the same organism undergoing the same metabolic processes achieved the same good results. This represents a significant change in current surgical strategies for the dental region: instead of focusing on a single gold-standard technique, it is possible to follow a hybrid approach by adapting the biomaterial and the protocol used to the specificities of the defect.

Background: Maxillofacial bone defects present considerable challenges in oral and reconstructive surgery. While autologous bone grafts are the gold standard, their limitations, such as donor site morbidity and limited availability, have driven the search for alternative biomaterials. SmartBone^®, a xeno-hybrid graft, offers potential advantages due to its bioactivity and remodeling capacity. Methods: This analysis of a series of clinical cases, evaluated the performance of SmartBone^® in 10 patients presenting with various maxillofacial bone defects. The patient follow-up period spanned from 2017 to 2019, with a maximum duration of 30 months. Bone grafting was performed, and integration was monitored using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography at multiple timepoints. Bone density changes (ΔCT values) in selected anatomical sites were analyzed to assess graft transformation and integration. Results: SmartBone^® supported effective bone regeneration and selective remodeling in all cases. One patient required a revision procedure, after which successful integration was observed. Cellular colonization began within weeks, with complete remodeling into mature bone occurring between 6–12 months. Evidence of cortical wall resorption and reformation on the graft’s external surface confirmed this transformation. ΔCT values progressively aligned with native bone densities, indicating structural and functional integration. Conclusions: SmartBone^® demonstrates strong osteointegrative and site-specific remodeling capabilities, offering a reliable and predictable alternative for maxillofacial bone reconstruction. The study presents several limitations, including the small sample size, inter-patient variability, possible imaging artifacts due to metallic elements in Cone-Beam Computed Tomography scans and the lack of histological confirmation.

Background/Aim: Third molar impaction with the consequent root resorption of second molars often creates complexities in treatment planning and execution. In the past, the root canal treatment (RCT) of second molars was required in these cases to avoid pulp necrosis and infection. The aim of this paper is to report a surgical/retrograde approach for the maintenance of pulp vitality, proposed as retrograde vital pulp treatment (rVPT), in cases of asymptomatic or reversibly affected teeth with root resorptions caused by impacted adjacent teeth. Methods: A case report on the rVPT of two upper second molars with root resorption due to third molar impaction is presented. The chief complaint of the patient was a slight pain during bite involving the upper second molars. Heat and cold sensitivity tests were performed, suggesting a healthy pulp status. A cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan was performed to aid the diagnosis and treatment planning, showing bilateral upper third molar impaction and both distal roots of the upper second molars affected by external root resorption (ERR). In both cases, the third molar was surgically extracted, the surface of the root with ERR was smoothened and rVPT was carried out by performing a 3 mm retrograde preparation of the root canal and its retrograde sealing using a hydraulic calcium silicate-based cement (hCSCs). Results: Heat and cold sensitivity tests were performed 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year after the treatment. The patient reported no pain, and the pulp sensitivity was maintained in all follow-up periods. A CBCT scan was performed 24 months after the treatment, reporting a complete perirradicular endogenous bone apposition. Conclusions: Based on the successful clinical and radiographic outcomes observed in the present case after two years of follow-up, rVPT is proposed for the maintenance of pulp vitality in cases of asymptomatic or reversibly affected teeth with ERR caused by impacted adjacent teeth.