Ricardo Gómez Huelgas

Prof. Dr. Ricardo Gómez Huelgas

Internal Medicine Department, Regional University Hospital of Málaga, University of Malaga, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga (IBIMA), Avda. Carlos Haya s/n., 29010 Málaga, Spain

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
24 June 2024 in European Journal of Internal Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RKReinhold Herr Kreutz
Reinhold Herr Kreutz
MBMattias Brunström
Mattias Brunström
Michel BurnierMichel Burnier
Michel Burnier
Guido GrassiGuido Grassi
Guido Grassi
AJAndrzej Januszewicz
Andrzej Januszewicz
GMGiuseppe Mancia
Giuseppe Mancia

JCJaime Sanz Cánovas
Jaime Sanz Cánovas
ALAlmudena López-Sampalo
Almudena López-Sampalo
LCLidia Cobos-Palacios
Lidia Cobos-Palacios
MRMichele Ricci
Michele Ricci
HHHalbert Hernández-Negrín
Halbert Hernández-Negrín
MBM Rosa Bernal-Lopez
M Rosa Bernal-Lopez
The life expectancy of the population is increasing worldwide due to improvements in the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of diseases. This favors a higher prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in the elderly. Sarcopenia and frailty are also frequently present in aging. These three entities share common mechanisms such as insulin resistance, chronic inflammation, and mitochondrial dysfunction. The coexistence of these situations worsens the prognosis of elderly patients. In this paper, we review the main measures for the prevention and management of sarcopenia and/or frailty in elderly patients with T2DM.

26 October 2020 in The Journals of Gerontology, Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Jose-Manuel Ramos-RinconJose-Manuel Ramos-Rincon
Jose-Manuel Ramos-Rincon
VBVerónica Buonaiuto
Verónica Buonaiuto
MRMichele Ricci
Michele Ricci
JMJesica Martín-Carmona
Jesica Martín-Carmona
DPDiana Paredes-Ruíz
Diana Paredes-Ruíz
SNSemi-Covid-19 Network
Semi-Covid-19 Network
Background: Advanced age is a well-known risk factor for poor prognosis in COVID-19. However, few studies have specifically focused on very old inpatients with COVID-19. This study aims to describe the clinical characteristics of very old inpatients with COVID-19 and identify risk factors for in-hospital mortality at admission. Methods: We conducted a nationwide, multicenter, retrospective, observational study in patients ≥ 80 years hospitalized with COVID-19 in 150 Spanish hospitals (SEMI-COVID-19) Registry (March 1–May 29, 2020). The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. A uni- and multivariate logistic regression was performed to assess predictors of mortality at admission. Results: A total of 2772 consecutive patients (49.4% men, median age 86.3 years) were analyzed. Rates of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, dementia, and Barthel Index < 60 were 30.8%, 25.6%, 30.5%, and 21.0%, respectively. The overall case-fatality rate was 46.9% (n: 1301) and increased with age (80–84 years: 41.6%; 85–90 years: 47.3%; 90–94 years: 52.7%; ≥95 years: 54.2%). After analysis, male sex and moderate-to-severe dependence were independently associated with in-hospital mortality; comorbidities were not predictive. At admission, independent risk factors for death were: oxygen saturation < 90%; temperature ≥ 37.8°C; quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) score ≥ 2; and unilateral–bilateral infiltrates on chest x-rays. Some analytical findings were independent risk factors for death, including estimated glomerular filtration rate < 45 mL/min/1.73 m2; lactate dehydrogenase ≥ 500 U/L; C-reactive protein ≥ 80 mg/L; neutrophils ≥ 7.5 × 103/μL; lymphocytes < 0.8 × 103/μL; and monocytes < 0.5 × 103/μL. Conclusions: This first large, multicenter cohort of very old inpatients with COVID-19 shows that age, male sex, and poor preadmission functional status—not comorbidities—are independently associated with in-hospital mortality. Severe COVID-19 at admission is related to poor prognosis.

4 November 2020 in Annals of Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
FCFrancisco Javier Carrasco-Sánchez
Francisco Javier Carrasco-Sánchez
MLMª Dolores López-Carmona
Mª Dolores López-Carmona
FMFrancisco Javier Martínez-Marcos
Francisco Javier Martínez-Marcos
LPLuis M. Pérez-Belmonte
Luis M. Pérez-Belmonte
AHAlicia Hidalgo-Jiménez
Alicia Hidalgo-Jiménez
FNFor The Semi-Covid-19 Network
For The Semi-Covid-19 Network
Hyperglycaemia has emerged as an important risk factor for death in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between blood glucose (BG) levels and ...

21 May 2021 in Nutrients
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JAJuan F. Alcala-Diaz
Juan F. Alcala-Diaz
LLLaura Limia-Perez
Laura Limia-Perez
RHRicardo Gómez Huelgas
Ricardo Gómez Huelgas
MEMaría Dolores Escalante
María Dolores Escalante
BRBegoña Cortés Rodríguez
Begoña Cortés Rodríguez
JLJosé López-Miranda
José López-Miranda
Context. Calcifediol has been proposed as a potential treatment for COVID-19 patients. Objective: To compare the administration or not of oral calcifediol on mortality risk of patients hospitalized because of COVID-19. Design: Retrospective, multicenter, open, non-randomized cohort study. Settings: Hospitalized care. Patients: Patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 between 5 February and 5 May 2020 in five hospitals in the South of Spain. Intervention: Patients received calcifediol (25-hydroxyvitamin D3) treatment (0.266 mg/capsule, 2 capsules on entry and then one capsule on day 3, 7, 14, 21, and 28) or not. Main Outcome Measure: In-hospital mortality during the first 30 days after admission. Results: A total of 537 patients were hospitalized with COVID-19 (317 males (59%), median age, 70 years), and 79 (14.7%) received calcifediol treatment. Overall, in-hospital mortality during the first 30 days was 17.5%. The OR of death for patients receiving calcifediol (mortality rate of 5%) was 0.22 (95% CI, 0.08 to 0.61) compared to patients not receiving such treatment (mortality rate of 20%; p < 0.01). Patients who received calcifediol after admission were more likely than those not receiving treatment to have comorbidity and a lower rate of CURB-65 score for pneumonia severity ≥ 3 (one point for each of confusion, urea > 7 mmol/L, respiratory rate ≥ 30/min, systolic blood pressure < 90 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure ≤ 60 mm Hg, and age ≥ 65 years), acute respiratory distress syndrome (moderate or severe), c-reactive protein, chronic kidney disease, and blood urea nitrogen. In a multivariable logistic regression model, adjusting for confounders, there were significant differences in mortality for patients receiving calcifediol compared with patients not receiving it (OR = 0.16 (95% CI 0.03 to 0.80). Conclusion: Among patients hospitalized with COVID-19, treatment with calcifediol, compared with those not receiving calcifediol, was significantly associated with lower in-hospital mortality during the first 30 days. The observational design and sample size may limit the interpretation of these findings.

28 September 2020 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Enrique RodillaEnrique Rodilla
Enrique Rodilla
ASAlberto Saura
Alberto Saura
IJIratxe Jiménez
Iratxe Jiménez
AMAndrea Mendizábal
Andrea Mendizábal
APAraceli Pineda-Cantero
Araceli Pineda-Cantero
RHRicardo Gómez Huelgas
Ricardo Gómez Huelgas
It is unclear to which extent the higher mortality associated with hypertension in the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is due to its increased prevalence among older patients or to specific mechanisms. Cross-sectional, observational, retrospective multicenter study, analyzing 12226 patients who required hospital admission in 150 Spanish centers included in the nationwide SEMI-COVID-19 Network. We compared the clinical characteristics of survivors versus non-survivors. The mean age of the study population was 67.5 ± 16.1 years, 42.6% were women. Overall, 2630 (21.5%) subjects died. The most common comorbidity was hypertension (50.9%) followed by diabetes (19.1%), and atrial fibrillation (11.2%). Multivariate analysis showed that after adjusting for gender (males, OR: 1.5, p = 0.0001), age tertiles (second and third tertiles, OR: 2.0 and 4.7, p = 0.0001), and Charlson Comorbidity Index scores (second and third tertiles, OR: 4.7 and 8.1, p = 0.0001), hypertension was significantly predictive of all-cause mortality when this comorbidity was treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) (OR: 1.6, p = 0.002) or other than renin-angiotensin-aldosterone blockers (OR: 1.3, p = 0.001) or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) (OR: 1.2, p = 0.035). The preexisting condition of hypertension had an independent prognostic value for all-cause mortality in patients with COVID-19 who required hospitalization. ARBs showed a lower risk of lethality in hypertensive patients than other antihypertensive drugs.