Adriano Marques

Dr. Adriano Marques

Federal University of Paraíba, João Pessoa, Paraíba, Brazil
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 August 2020 in Energy Conversion and Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RSRonelly José De Souza
Ronelly José De Souza
CSC.A.C. Dos Santos
C.A.C. Dos Santos
AOA.A.V. Ochoa
A.A.V. Ochoa
Adriano MarquesAdriano Marques
Adriano Marques
JNJ. L. M. Neto
J. L. M. Neto
PMP.S.A. Michima
P.S.A. Michima

1 February 2021 in Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Adriano MarquesAdriano Marques
Adriano Marques
Monica CarvalhoMonica Carvalho
Monica Carvalho
AOAlvaro A.V. Ochoa
Alvaro A.V. Ochoa
RARaphael Abrahao
Raphael Abrahao
CSCarlos A.C. Santos
Carlos A.C. Santos

23 May 2020 in Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Adriano MarquesAdriano Marques
Adriano Marques
Monica CarvalhoMonica Carvalho
Monica Carvalho
Atilio B. LourençoAtilio B. Lourenço
Atilio B. Lourenço
CSCarlos Antônio Cabral dos Santos
Carlos Antônio Cabral dos Santos

16 October 2020 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Adriano MarquesAdriano Marques
Adriano Marques
Monica CarvalhoMonica Carvalho
Monica Carvalho
Dr Alvaro OchoaDr Alvaro Ochoa
Dr Alvaro Ochoa
RSRonelly José De Souza
Ronelly José De Souza
CSCarlos Antônio Cabral dos Santos
Carlos Antônio Cabral dos Santos
This study applies the SPecific Exergy COsting (SPECO) methodology for the exergoeconomic assessment of a compact electricity-cooling cogeneration system. The system utilizes the exhaust gases from a 126 hp Otto-cycle internal combustion engine (ICE) to drive a 5 RT ammonia–water absorption refrigeration unit. Exergy destruction is higher in the ICE (67.88%), followed by the steam generator (14.46%). Considering the cost of destroyed exergy plus total cost rate of equipment, the highest values are found in the ICE, followed by the steam generator. Analysis of relative cost differences and exergoeconomic factors indicate that improvements should focus on the steam generator, evaporator, and absorber. The cost rate of the fuel consumed by the combustion engine is 12.84 USD/h, at a specific exergy cost of 25.76 USD/GJ. The engine produces power at a cost rate of 10.52 USD/h and specific exergy cost of 64.14 USD/GJ. Cooling refers to the chilled water from the evaporator at a cost rate of 0.85 USD/h and specific exergy cost of 84.74 USD/GJ. This study expands the knowledge base regarding the exergoeconomic assessment of compact combined cooling and power systems.

1 February 2022 in International Journal of Refrigeration
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RARenata Portela Abreu
Renata Portela Abreu
VCVictor Hugo Lobo Correia
Victor Hugo Lobo Correia
ALAtílio Barbosa Lourenço
Atílio Barbosa Lourenço
Adriano MarquesAdriano Marques
Adriano Marques
MCMonica Carvalho
Monica Carvalho

1 January 2022 in International Journal of Exergy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MCMonica Carvalho
Monica Carvalho
Adriano MarquesAdriano Marques
Adriano Marques
NON.A. o
N.A. o
RARaphael Abrahão
Raphael Abrahão
Because of the significant public concern regarding climate change (and global warming), greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions have been successfully employed to communicate environmental impacts. This st...