Katarina Eckerberg

Prof. Katarina Eckerberg

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

42Years (1985-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 August 2010 in Global Environmental Change
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ADAndreas Duit
Andreas Duit
VGVictor Galaz
Victor Galaz
KEKatarina Eckerberg
Katarina Eckerberg
JEJonas Ebbesson
Jonas Ebbesson

1 August 2013 in Forest Policy and Economics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CSCharlotta Söderberg
Charlotta Söderberg
KEKatarina Eckerberg
Katarina Eckerberg

1 October 2004 in Local Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KEKatarina Eckerberg
Katarina Eckerberg
MJMarko Joas
Marko Joas

10 October 2021 in AMBIO
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Metodi SotirovMetodi Sotirov
Metodi Sotirov
GWGeorg Winkel
Georg Winkel
KEKatarina Eckerberg
Katarina Eckerberg
European forest policymaking is shaped by progressing European integration, yet with notable ideological divisions and diverging interests among countries. This paper focuses on the coalitional politics of key environmental forest issues: biodiversity conservation, timber legality, and climate protection policy. Combining the Advocacy Coalition Framework and the Shifting Coalition Theory, and informed by more than 186 key informant interviews and 73 policy documents spanning a 20-year timeframe, we examine the evolution of coalitional forest politics in Europe. We find that the basic line-up has remained stable: an environmental coalition supporting EU environmental forest policy integration and a forest sector coalition mostly opposing it. Still, strategic alliances across these coalitions have occurred for specific policy issues which have resulted in a gradual establishment of an EU environmental forest policy. We conclude with discussion of our findings and provide suggestions for further research.

1 March 2016 in Land Use Policy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SBSara Borgström
Sara Borgström
AZAnna Zachrisson
Anna Zachrisson
KEKatarina Eckerberg
Katarina Eckerberg

11 October 2013 in Environmental Politics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SBSusan Baker
Susan Baker
KEKatarina Eckerberg
Katarina Eckerberg
AZAnna Zachrisson
Anna Zachrisson
Ecological restoration has taken on a new significance in the face of climate change and biodiversity loss. Despite its growing policy salience, however, the social and political sciences have paid limited attention to the study of ecological restoration policy and practice. By drawing upon the political science study of multilevel governance, institutions, power elations, and place-based politics, a flavour is given of what a political science engagement might contribute to the rich tapestry of analysis that has already been produced by other disciplines on ecological restoration. As the use of restoration grows, it is increasingly likely that it will give rise to social dispute and be brought into conflict with a variety of environmental, cultural, economic, and community interests. Restoration policy and projects encounter professional and institutional norms as well as place-specific interests and values. There is urgent need to investigate how and in what ways some interests become winners and others losers in these activities, and how this in turn can influence ecological restoration outcomes. A political science lens could help build new criteria for evaluating the success of ecological restoration, ones that combine both process- and product-driven considerations.Restore www.restore-project.or