Background/Aims: Portal hypertension (PH) is a common complication of chronic liver disease and results in esophageal and gastric variceal bleeding, which is associated with a high mortality rate. Measurement of the hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) is considered the gold standard for diagnosing PH and estimating the risk of varices and bleeding. In contrast, upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy (UGE) can reliably demonstrate the presence of varices and bleeding. Both measures are invasive, and HVPG is mainly restricted to tertiary centers. Therefore, the development of noninvasive methods of assessing the severity of PH and the risk of variceal bleeding is warranted. Methods: We retrospectively examined the correlation of spleen stiffness (SSM) and liver stiffness measurements (LSM) with the incidence of variceal bleeding among 143 patients who underwent combined liver and spleen elastography between 2013 and 2015. Results: For 19 of 103 patients (16.8%), upper GI variceal bleeding was diagnosed and treated endoscopically. The median SSM of all patients was 35.3 kilopascals (kPa); the median LSM, 11.7 kPa. Patients with previous bleeding episodes had significantly higher SSM (75.0 kPa) and LSM (37.3 kPa) than those without a history of bleeding (SSM, 30.6 kPa; LSM, 8.2 kPa; p < 0.0001). Seventy-five patients (66.4%) underwent UGE in addition to SSM and LSM: 25 with no esophageal varices (EVs; SSM, 29.5 kPa; LSM, 11.4 kPa), 16 with EV grade 1 (SSM, 35.9 kPa; LSM, 33.4 kPa), 21 with EV grade 2 (SSM, 67.8 kPa; LSM, 27.0 kPa) and 13 with EV grade 3 (SSM, 75.0 kPa; LSM, 26.3 kPa). No statistically significant differences were found between respective grades of EV but were found between the presence and absence of varices. At a calculated cutoff level of 42.6 kPa (with application of 95% CI), SSM had sensitivity of 89% and specificity of 64% in determining the risk of bleeding, with a negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.97 (LSM sensitivity, 84%; LSM specificity, 80%; LSM NPV, 0.96 at LSM cutoff level of 20.8 kPa). When LSM (cutoff level, 20.8 kPa) and SSM (cutoff level, 42.6 kPa) were combined, the NPV was 1 (sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 55%). Conclusion: SSM and LSM as determined by FibroScan (a noninvasive method of detecting PH) is positively correlated with upper GI variceal bleeding (optimal SSM cutoff level, 42.6 kPa; optimal LSM cutoff level, 20.8 kPa). No patients with both SSM and LSM below cutoff levels had a history of bleeding complications.

Acute and chronic liver disease is a relevant problem worldwide. Liver function plays a crucial role in the course of liver diseases not only in estimating prognosis but also with regard to therapeutic interventions. Within this review, we discuss and evaluate different tools from screening to diagnosis and give insights from personal experiences, controlled clinical studies and future perspectives. Finally, we offer our novel diagnostic algorithm to screen patients with presumptive acute or chronic liver disease in the daily clinical routine.

Background and Aims: Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is the treatment of choice in decompensated portal hypertension. TIPS revision due to th

Aim: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of liver maximum capacity (LiMAx®) test compared to transient elastography (TE) and serum biomarkers for the noninvasive detection of different stages of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively correlated LiMAx®, TE, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) to alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ratio (AAR), AST-to-platelet ratio index (APRI), and fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) score with histological specimens in 102 patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) who underwent liver biopsy (either percutaneously or via mini-laparoscopy) at the University Clinic of Essen between 10/2016 and 12/2017. Results: Median LiMAx® values showed a tendency to decrease in accordance with increasing histological degree of fibrosis based on the Desmet scoring system (F0: 446.5 [381.0–592.5] µg/h/kg, F1: 405.0 [343.0–547.0] µg/h/kg, F2: 337.0 [250.0–394.0] µg/h/kg, F3: 281.0 [262.0–364.0] µg/h/kg, and F4: 181.5 [130.0–256.5] µg/h/kg. Furthermore, ­LiMAx® was superior to TE, FIB-4, AAR, and APRI in detecting different stages of fibrosis, while Spearman’s rank correlation test showed a statistically significant association of –0.68, 0.62, 0.61, 0.46, and 0.42, respectively. However, the combination of TE and LiMAx® had the highest diagnostic accuracy in detecting liver cirrhosis (sensitivity 88.9%, specificity 84.6%, Youden index 0.735). Conclusion: Enzymatic liver function measured by LiMAx® showed strong correlation with histology in patients with CLD irrespective of its underlying etiology and was superior to TE and serum biomarkers, possibly making it useful as a novel and noninvasive tool for the determination of hepatic disease severity.

Chronic liver disease (CLD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Non-invasive assessment of hepatic disease severity represents a relevant issue to further improve clinical management and therapeutic treatment. We retrospectively compared the diagnostic and prognostic performance of different non-invasive tools (LiMAx, transient elastography (TE), and biomarkers) in detecting different severity stages during the course of CLD. Patients were divided into four groups based on clinical parameters: (1) patients without CLD (control group), (2) patients suffering from CLD without having cirrhosis, (3) patients with CLD and compensated cirrhosis, and finally, (4) patients with CLD and decompensated cirrhosis. Patients with acute liver failure were excluded from the analysis. A total of 464 patients who underwent LiMAx measurement at the University Clinic of Essen between 10/2016 and 11/2017 were included in this study. Distribution of the different groups were n = 72 patients for group 1, n = 134 patients for group 2, n = 160 patients for group 3, and n = 98 patients for group 4, respectively. Median LiMAx values significantly declined with respect to increasing degree of CLD: (1) 510 µg/h/kg, (2) 390 µg/h/kg, (3) 264 µg/h/kg, and (4) 151 µg/h/kg (p < 0.001). When comparing the diagnostic accuracy of the LiMAx test in detecting patients with presence of cirrhosis (groups 1 and 2 vs. groups 3 and 4), an AUROC of 0.942 was found (cut-off 322 µg/h/kg, sensitivity 86.1%, specificity 91.3%, p < 0.0001). LiMAx was superior to TE and serum biomarkers in predicting patients’ outcome by 90-day mortality (AUROC 0.811, p < 0.001). Enzymatic liver function measured by LiMAx was closely associated with different severity stages of CLD and was a reliable diagnostic and prognostic tool with an accuracy comparable to current standard methods.