Qin Su

Prof. Dr. Qin Su

School of Management, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
8 July 2021 in Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PMPaul Muisyo
Paul Muisyo
QSQin Su
Qin Su
THThu Hau Ho
Thu Hau Ho
MJMercy Muthoni Julius
Mercy Muthoni Julius
Purpose: The rising public concern for the natural environment is compelling business entities to revise their business models toward green management. Most manufacturing firms have realized that green innovation is a critical factor that drives their success. However, green human resource scholars have overlooked this research line despite the potential contribution it can advance in green management scholarship. This paper empirically models the extent to which green innovation culture (GIC) moderates the relationship between green human resource management (GHRM) and green competitive advantage (GCA). The paper has two-fold objectives. First, to investigate the effects of GHRM and GIC on the firm's GCA and second, to model the extent to which GIC moderates the link between GHRM practices and GCA of manufacturing firms in Zhejiang Province of China.Design/methodology/approach: Data were collected from 324 Chinese employees from the manufacturing sector. The authors captured data from all levels of the organization. The authors made three models equations: two direct and one interactive. The authors then applied structural equation modeling (SEM) using AMOS 24 to test the study models and hypothesis.Findings: The findings suggest that GHRM practices, which include recruitment and selection, training and development (green abilities); performance management and reward and compensation (green motivation); and employee involvement and leadership (green opportunities) have a significant positive effect on the firms GCA. The findings also indicate that firms that GIC, which include green product innovation (GPDI) and green process innovation (GPRI), promotes the firm's GCA. The paper further reveals that firms that combine GHRM and GIC attain higher GIC than those which practice GHRM only.Originality/value: This paper draws a roadmap on how the top management in manufacturing firms can drive the firm's operations toward a higher GCA. It's the pioneer paper to suggest the combination of GHRM and GCI for enhanced GCA.

10 November 2021 in Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PMPaul Muisyo
Paul Muisyo
QSQin Su
Qin Su
THThu Hau Ho
Thu Hau Ho
MJMercy Muthoni Julius
Mercy Muthoni Julius
MUMuhammad Shahjahan Usmani
Muhammad Shahjahan Usmani
Purpose: The available literature demonstrates that green human resource management (GHRM) practices enhance the firm's green performance. However, the studies fail to show how GHRM practices give rise to green culture and how such green culture influences the green competitiveness of a firm. Anchored on the Ability Motivation Opportunity (AMO) theory, this study investigates how firms can build green competitive advantage from GHRM. The study focuses on four enablers of green culture (EGC): leadership emphasis, message credibility, peer involvement and employee empowerment. The study tests the mediating role of each EGC in the relationship between GHRM and green competitive advantage (GCA). The study findings provide managers with a deeper understanding of how GHRM supports the development of the EGC and how they explain the firm's GCA.Design/methodology/approach: Data was collected from a large-scale survey of Malaysia's manufacturing firm. We managed to collect 96 valid and useable questionnaires.Findings: We find that GHRM practices give rise to EGC and the EGC mediate the relationship between GHRM and GCA.Originality/value: The study presents the EGC in the green competitiveness context and goes further to test its mediating role in the GHRM–GCA relationship. We also develop a novel conceptual framework that manufacturing firms can deploy to attain green competitive advantage.

1 February 2021 in Waste Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HQHaike Qiao
Haike Qiao
QSQin Su
Qin Su

3 September 2021 in International Journal of Manpower
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PMPaul Muisyo
Paul Muisyo
QSQin Su
Qin Su
THThu Hau Ho
Thu Hau Ho
MJMercy Muthoni Julius
Mercy Muthoni Julius
TATsirinirinantenaina Barisoava Andriamandresy
Tsirinirinantenaina Barisoava Andriamandresy
Purpose: The purpose of this research is to examine how firms can build collective organisational citizenship behaviour towards the environment (OCBE) from green human resource management (GHRM) practices. The study tests how the three main aspects of GHRM, namely green abilities, green motivation and green opportunities, give rise to the enablers of green culture (EGC). The study further tests how each of the EGC (leadership emphasis, message credibility, peer involvement and employee empowerment) leads to the development of OCBE at the organisational level of analysis.Design/methodology/approach: Data were collected from Taiwanese manufacturing companies with a target of departmental heads. The authors managed to get 284 valid responses and analysed the data using path analysis on Stata12.Findings: The study findings suggest that GHRM practices that include developing green abilities, green motivation and green opportunities support the development of the EGC. The EGC include leadership emphasis, message credibility, peer involvement and employee empowerment. It was, however, found that green abilities do not support the development of message credibility. It was further found the EGC lead to the development of collective OCBE except for peer involvement.Originality/value: The authors propose an original concept of EGC in the context of Taiwanese manufacturing firms. This paper is amongst the pioneer papers to test the OCBE at organisational level. The authors also develop an integrated conceptual framework upon which firms can use in order to build OCBE at organisational level. Previous studies have examined OCBEs at employee/individual level.

22 January 2017 in Creativity and Innovation Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JGJing Guo
Jing Guo
QSQin Su
Qin Su
QZQian Zhang
Qian Zhang

20 January 2023 in Computers & Industrial Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HQHaike Qiao
Haike Qiao
Zijun ZhangZijun Zhang
Zijun Zhang
QSQin Su
Qin Su