The number of deaths from colorectal cancer in Japan continues to rise, with over 50,000 deaths recorded in 2018. In the 2024 edition, revisions to all aspects of treatment were undertaken, with corrections and additions made based on knowledge gained since the 2022 version (drug therapy) and the 2019 version (other treatments). The Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) guidelines 2024 for the treatment of colorectal cancer have been prepared to present standard treatment strategies, reduce disparities among institutions, avoid both unnecessary and insufficient treatment, and enhance mutual understanding between healthcare professionals and patients by making these guidelines accessible to the public. These guidelines were developed through consensus by the JSCCR Guideline Committee, following a careful review of evidence retrieved from literature searches and considering the medical insurance system and actual clinical practice in Japan. Therefore, these guidelines serve as a tool for managing colorectal cancer in real-world clinical settings. More specifically, they can be used to support obtaining informed consent from patients and selecting the most appropriate treatment method for each patient. Controversial topics were selected as clinical questions, and recommendations were provided. Each recommendation is accompanied by an evidence classification and a recommendation category, both based on consensus reached by the Guideline Committee members. This article presents the English version of the JSCCR guidelines 2024.

Curative resection of sigmoid colon and rectal cancer includes “high tie” of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA). However, IMA ligation compromises blood flow to the anastomosis, which may increase the leakage rate, and it is unclear whether this confers a survival advantage. Accordingly, the IMA may be ligated at a point just below the origin of the left colic artery (LCA) “low tie” combined with lymph node dissection (LND) around the origin of the IMA (low tie with LND). However, no study has investigated the detailed prognostic results between “high tie” and “low tie with LND.” The aim of this study was to assess the utility of “low tie with LND” on survival in patients with sigmoid colon or rectal cancer. A total of 189 sigmoid colon or rectal cancer patients who underwent curative operation from 1997 to 2007 were enrolled in this study. The patient’s medical records were reviewed to obtain clinicopathological information. Overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, with differences assessed using log-rank test. Forty-two and 147 patients were ligated at the origin of the IMA (high tie) and just below the origin of the LCA combined with LND around the origin of the IMA (low tie with LND), respectively. No significant differences were observed in the complication rate and OS and RFS rates in the two groups. Further, no significant difference was observed in the OS and RFS rates in the lymph node-positive cases in the two groups. “Low tie with LND” is anatomically less invasive and is not inferior to “high tie” with prognostic point of view.

Objective: Difficulties are associated with the management of brain metastasis (BM), which portends a poor prognosis in the treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC). The aim of the present study was to identify risk factors for BM in CRC and evaluate the outcomes of various treatment modalities. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data on a total of 2,238 patients with primary CRC who underwent surgical resection at our hospital between 1999 and 2014. Predictive factors for BM and prognostic factors after the diagnosis of BM were examined by univariate and multivariate analyses using Cox proportional hazards models. Results: Three patients (0.1%) had BM at the initial diagnosis, and 23 patients (1.2%) developed metachronous BM during the median follow-up period of 44.6 months. Lung and bone metastases were identified as independent predictive factors for BM. Median survival after the diagnosis of BM was 7.4 months. Stereotactic radiosurgery, administered to 41% of the patients with BM, was associated with a better postdiagnostic survival. Conclusion: CRC patients with metastasis to the lung or bone were at a higher risk of BM. Because the survival is still limited, it is crucial to determine the treatment strategy in consideration of the characteristics of each therapy and quality of life in CRC patients with BM.