Cecilia Osterman

Dr. Cecilia Osterman


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2020 in Safety Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
COCecilia Osterman
Cecilia Osterman
CHCarl Hult
Carl Hult
Gesa PraetoriusGesa Praetorius
Gesa Praetorius

2 November 2015 in Maritime Policy & Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
COCecilia Osterman
Cecilia Osterman
CHCarl Hult
Carl Hult
Despite significant changes in work tasks performed on board, towards more sedentary monitoring and administrative work, the incidence of occupational injuries and disorders remains high among seafarers. In order to improve safety standards, industry stakeholders increasingly require written documentation of numerous routines, procedures and tasks performed on board. These increased demands have however added to the administrative burden. Some say, to the extent that administrative work has become a safety risk in itself. This paper presents the result of a survey investigating how Swedish seafarers perceive their own level of fatigue, stress and over-exertion related to work. The material consists of 1309 respondents originating from a random selection procedure, of which 651 reported to be employed in short sea shipping. Multiple regression analysis (OLS regression), allowing adjusted effects, were applied in several steps of the analysis. The highest levels of exertion were reported by employees in the catering department, positions not generally associated with high administrative burden. Perceived high levels of administrative work do increase the level of exertion, but cannot explain the observed pattern. Future ship and trade-specific studies on physical and mental well-being and complementary studies on the catering department’s working conditions and work environment are necessary.

1 May 2016 in International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
COCecilia Osterman
Cecilia Osterman
CBCecilia Berlin
Cecilia Berlin
LBLars-Ola Bligård
Lars-Ola Bligård

3 May 2016 in WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MBMagnus Boström
Magnus Boström
COCecilia Osterman
Cecilia Osterman

7 April 2014 in Maritime Policy & Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
COCecilia Osterman
Cecilia Osterman
LRLinda Rose
Linda Rose

3 November 2022 in Occupational Health Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MBMagnus Boström
Magnus Boström
COCecilia Osterman
Cecilia Osterman
Seafaring shares many characteristics with contemporary working life ashore. However, a major difference is that seafarers can spend up to 12 months aboard a ship that constitutes a work, living and recreational environment. Onboard work includes many stressors that can potentially contribute to workplace bullying and harassment, which in turn can affect safety critical operations. The aim of this study was to identify underlying causes in the organizational and social work environment that can cause workplace bullying and harassment at sea, and to suggest appropriate preventive and promotive strategies and measures. Data were collected mainly through World Café workshops with 56 participants from the Swedish maritime industry. Seafarer occupational health, safety, and wellbeing is largely determined by interdependent factors at micro, meso, and macro levels, where different stakeholders play various roles. Strategies and measures starting at the individual seafarer, and gradually expanding outwards toward the maritime industry are suggested. It is important that a victim of bullying or harassment receives adequate support. Creating crew courage enables employees to both recognize troubling situations and know how to act and respond to a situation. To bridge the gap between policy and practice, the legislative framework needs translating into practical procedures to make sense to the middle manager at the sharp end, with limited knowledge, time, resources, and decision latitude. Future research should evaluate the effectiveness of work environment interventions – what works, for whom, and under which circumstances.
1