Arpit Bhatt

Mr. Arpit Bhatt

National Renewable Energy Laboratory
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
12 January 2023 in ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
TUTaylor Uekert
Taylor Uekert
ASAvantika Singh
Avantika Singh
JDJason S. DesVeaux
Jason S. DesVeaux
TGTapajyoti Ghosh
Tapajyoti Ghosh
ABArpit Bhatt
Arpit Bhatt
ACAlberta C. Carpenter
Alberta C. Carpenter

1 September 2021 in Joule
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ASAvantika Singh
Avantika Singh
NRNicholas A. Rorrer
Nicholas A. Rorrer
SNScott R. Nicholson
Scott R. Nicholson
EEErika Erickson
Erika Erickson
JDJason S. DesVeaux
Jason S. DesVeaux
GBGregg T. Beckham
Gregg T. Beckham

8 July 2021 in Energy & Environmental Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ABAndrew W. Bartling
Andrew W. Bartling
MSMichael L. Stone
Michael L. Stone
RHRebecca J. Hanes
Rebecca J. Hanes
ABArpit Bhatt
Arpit Bhatt
YZYimin Zhang
Yimin Zhang
GBGregg Beckham
Gregg Beckham
Reductive catalytic fractionation (RCF) is a promising approach to fractionate lignocellulose and convert lignin to a narrow product slate. To guide research towards commercialization, cost and sustainability must be considered. Here we report a techno-economic analysis (TEA), life cycle assessment (LCA), and air emission analysis of the RCF process, wherein biomass carbohydrates are converted to ethanol and the RCF oil is the lignin-derived product. The base-case process, using a feedstock supply of 2000 dry metric tons per day, methanol as a solvent, and H2 gas as a hydrogen source, predicts a minimum selling price (MSP) of crude RCF oil of $1.13 per kg when ethanol is sold at $2.50 per gallon of gasoline-equivalent ($0.66 per liter of gasoline-equivalent). We estimate that the RCF process accounts for 57% of biorefinery installed capital costs, 77% of positive life cycle global warming potential (GWP) (excluding carbon uptake), and 43% of positive cumulative energy demand (CED). Of $563.7 MM total installed capital costs, the RCF area accounts for $323.5 MM, driven by high-pressure reactors. Solvent recycle and water removal via distillation incur a process heat demand equivalent to 73% of the biomass energy content, and accounts for 35% of total operating costs. In contrast, H2 cost and catalyst recycle are relatively minor contributors to operating costs and environmental impacts. In the carbohydrate-rich pulps, polysaccharide retention is predicted not to substantially affect the RCF oil MSP. Analysis of cases using different solvents and hemicellulose as an in situ hydrogen donor reveals that reducing reactor pressure and the use of low vapor pressure solvents could reduce both capital costs and environmental impacts. Processes that reduce the energy demand for solvent separation also improve GWP, CED, and air emissions. Additionally, despite requiring natural gas imports, converting lignin as a biorefinery co-product could significantly reduce non-greenhouse gas air emissions compared to burning lignin. Overall, this study suggests that research should prioritize ways to lower RCF operating pressure to reduce capital expenses associated with high-pressure reactors, minimize solvent loading to reduce reactor size and energy required for solvent recovery, implement condensed-phase separations for solvent recovery, and utilize the entirety of RCF oil to maximize value-added product revenues.

14 July 2020 in Bioengineering
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ABArpit Bhatt
Arpit Bhatt
LTLing Tao
Ling Tao
As the demand for utilizing environment-friendly and sustainable energy sources is increasing, the adoption of waste-to-energy technologies has started gaining attention. Producing biogas via anaerobic digestion (AD) is promising and well-established; however, this process in many circumstances is unable to be cost competitive with natural gas. In this research, we provide a technical assessment of current process challenges and compare the cost of biogas production via the AD process from the literature, Aspen Plus process modeling, and CapdetWorks software. We also provide insights on critical factors affecting the AD process and recommendations on optimizing the process. We utilize four types of wet wastes, including wastewater sludge, food waste, swine manure, and fat, oil, and grease, to provide a quantitative assessment of theoretical energy yields of biogas production and its economic potential at different plant scales. Our results show that the cost of biogas production from process and economic models are in line with the literature with a potential to go even lower for small-scale plants with technological advancements. This research illuminates potential cost savings for biogas production using different wastes and guide investors to make informed decisions, while achieving waste management goals.

1 June 2020 in iScience
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ABArpit Bhatt
Arpit Bhatt
ZRZhiyong (Jason) Ren
Zhiyong (Jason) Ren
LTLing Tao
Ling Tao
Although traditional anaerobic digestion (AD) process to produce methane-rich biogas from wet waste is deep-rooted, high carbon footprint and its low value as compared with other renewable sources demand advanced strategies to avoid its production. An emerging conversion pathway to arrest methanogenesis for producing value-added fuels and chemicals instead of biogas is sought as a sustainable alternative. This research provides a comprehensive analysis on current technology development, process challenges, applications, and economics for producing high-value short-chain carboxylic acids from AD of wet wastes. We show that (1) the theoretical energy yields of acids equal or exceed biogas, and (2) the cost of these acids is competitive with those produced from chemical markets, making this economically viable for mass production. With global abundance of wet waste feedstocks, this process of short-chain acid production provides a promising alternative to conventional biogas production technology, while achieving waste management and carbon mitigation goals.

1 August 2021 in Journal of Cleaner Production
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ULUisung Lee
Uisung Lee
ABArpit Bhatt
Arpit Bhatt
THTroy Robert Hawkins
Troy Robert Hawkins
LTLing Tao
Ling Tao
PBPahola Thathiana Benavides
Pahola Thathiana Benavides
MWMichael Wang
Michael Wang