Julianne  Williams

Julianne Williams


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2021 in Clinical Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Dimitra Rafailia BakaloudiDimitra Rafailia Bakaloudi
Dimitra Rafailia Bakaloudi
AHAfton Halloran
Afton Halloran
HRHolly L. Rippin
Holly L. Rippin
AOArtemis Christina Oikonomidou
Artemis Christina Oikonomidou
TDTheodoros I. Dardavesis
Theodoros I. Dardavesis
MCMichael Chourdakis
Michael Chourdakis
Vegan diets, where animal- and all their by-products are excluded from the diet, have gained popularity, especially in the last decade. However, the evaluation of this type of diet has not been well addressed in the scientific literature. This study aimed to investigate the adequacy of vegan diets in European populations and of their macro- and micronutrient intakes compared to World Health Organization recommendations. A systematic search in PubMed, Web of Science, IBSS, Cochrane library and Google Scholar was conducted and 48 studies (12 cohorts and 36 cross-sectional) were included. Regarding macronutrients, vegan diets are lower in protein intake compared with all other diet types. Veganism is also associated with low intake of vitamins B2, Niacin (B3), B12, D, iodine, zinc, calcium, potassium, selenium. Vitamin B12 intake among vegans is significantly lower (0.24-0.49 μg, recommendations are 2.4 μg) and calcium intake in the majority of vegans was below recommendations (750 mg/d). No significant differences in fat intake were observed. Vegan diets are not related to deficiencies in vitamins A, B1, Β6, C, E, iron, phosphorus, magnesium, copper and folate and have a low glycemic load. Following a vegan diet may result in deficiencies in micronutrients (vitamin B12, zinc, calcium and selenium) which should not be disregarded. However, low micro- and macronutrient intakes are not always associated with health impairments. Individuals who consume a vegan diet should be aware of the risk of potential dietary deficiencies.

17 August 2020 in Nutrients
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JWJulianne Williams
Julianne Williams
MBMarta Buoncristiano
Marta Buoncristiano
Paola NardonePaola Nardone
Paola Nardone
Ana RitoAna Rito
Ana Rito
ASAngela Spinelli
Angela Spinelli
JBJoão Breda
João Breda
Consuming a healthy diet in childhood helps to protect against malnutrition and noncommunicable diseases (NCDs). This cross-sectional study described the diets of 132,489 children aged six to nine years from 23 countries participating in round four (2015–2017) of the WHO European Childhood Obesity Surveillance Initiative (COSI). Children’s parents or caregivers were asked to complete a questionnaire that contained indicators of energy-balance-related behaviors (including diet). For each country, we calculated the percentage of children who consumed breakfast, fruit, vegetables, sweet snacks or soft drinks “every day”, “most days (four to six days per week)”, “some days (one to three days per week)”, or “never or less than once a week”. We reported these results stratified by country, sex, and region. On a daily basis, most children (78.5%) consumed breakfast, fewer than half (42.5%) consumed fruit, fewer than a quarter (22.6%) consumed fresh vegetables, and around one in ten consumed sweet snacks or soft drinks (10.3% and 9.4%, respectively); however, there were large between-country differences. This paper highlights an urgent need to create healthier food and drink environments, reinforce health systems to promote healthy diets, and continue to support child nutrition and obesity surveillance.

1 August 2018 in Alcohol
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LAL.N. Allen
L.N. Allen
NTNick Townsend
Nick Townsend
JWJulianne Williams
Julianne Williams
BMBente Mikkelsen
Bente Mikkelsen
NRNia Roberts
Nia Roberts
KWKremlin Wickramasinghe
Kremlin Wickramasinghe

26 June 2020 in European Journal of Public Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JWJulianne Williams
Julianne Williams
IRIvo Rakovac
Ivo Rakovac
ELEnrique Loyola
Enrique Loyola
LSLela Sturua
Lela Sturua
NMNino Maglakelidze
Nino Maglakelidze
JBJoão Breda
João Breda
Background: Self-reported measures of tobacco use may have limited validity, particularly among some populations. This study aims to validate self-reported smoking measures among Georgian adults participating in the 2016 STEPS survey using cotinine biomarker measurements, and to explore potential differences according to sociodemographic characteristics. Additionally, this paper examines how the estimated prevalence of smoking in the population varies according to measurement type. Methods: Using the WHO standardized STEPS methodology, adults self-reported their smoking status. In a later stage of the survey, a subset of participants provided a urine sample, which was tested for cotinine. Using each participant’s objective cotinine measurement and their self-reported smoking status, we calculated the sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value of self-reported smoking. Next, we calculated the estimated prevalence of smokers according to the type of measurement. Results: Results indicated high sensitivity (83.37%, 95% CI: 76.79–88.37%) among males and relatively low sensitivity (38.60% CI: 29.23–48.90%) among females. According to self-report, the prevalence of smokers was 26.44% (23.61–29.48%), while according to cotinine detection, the prevalence of smokers was 32.27% (29.16–35.55%). Among all subgroups, the self-reported prevalence of smoking was significantly lower than the cotinine-detected prevalence. Conclusions: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that the validity of the STEPS self-reported tobacco indicator has been tested. Self-reported measures of smoking status may lead to an under-estimation of smoking prevalence among Georgian adults, especially women. These findings suggest that integration of biochemical measures of smoking into tobacco use studies may be an important investment.

1 April 2019 in Public Health Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JWJulianne Williams
Julianne Williams
NTNick Townsend
Nick Townsend
MRMike Rayner
Mike Rayner
RJRanil Jayawardena
Ranil Jayawardena
PKPrasad Katulanda
Prasad Katulanda
KWKremlin Wickramasinghe
Kremlin Wickramasinghe
ObjectiveThe current paper describes methods of evaluating dietary habits of Sri Lankan adolescents based on the Diet Quality Index–International (DQI-I), which has been used in multiple international studies to describe dietary variety, moderation, adequacy and balance. The paper describes the method for calculating DQI-I scores and examines associations between DQI-I scores and dietary intake, and between DQI-I scores and sociodemographic factors.DesignThe study followed a three-stage cluster randomised sampling method. Dietary intake was collected using a validated FFQ. Estimated micronutrient intakes and number of servings consumed were described according to DQI-I quartiles. DQI-I scores were tabulated according to sociodemographic characteristics. Multilevel modelling was used to examine associations between sociodemographic characteristics and DQI-I scores.SettingSecondary schools in rural Sri Lanka.ParticipantsAdolescents (n 1300) aged 12–18 years attending secondary school in rural Sri Lanka.ResultsDQI-I scores increased with consumption of fat (% energy), cholesterol (mg/d), energy (kJ/d), protein (% energy), Na (mg), dietary fibre (g), Fe (mg) and Ca (mg), but decreased according to percentage of energy coming from carbohydrates. DQI-I scores were significantly lower among females and students with lower levels of maternal education.ConclusionsPolicies are needed to increase the availability and affordability of nutrient-rich foods such as fruits, vegetables and high-protein foods, particularly to students from lower socio-economic backgrounds. Significant differences in diet quality according to sex, socio-economic status and district suggest there is potential for targeted interventions that aim to increase access to affordable, nutrient-rich foods among these groups.

28 June 2021 in Obesity Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VKVeronika Knebusch
Veronika Knebusch
JWJulianne Williams
Julianne Williams
IAIsabel Yordi Aguirre
Isabel Yordi Aguirre
MWMartin W. Weber
Martin W. Weber
IRIvo Rakovac
Ivo Rakovac
JBJoão Breda
João Breda
Summary: Childhood obesity is a public health concern globally, with generally higher prevalence rates in boys compared to girls. Although biological sex is an important determinant, gender roles and norms influence the exposure and vulnerability to risk factors for noncommunicable diseases. Norms and roles might be reinforced or change due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) related measures as well as the exposure to risk factors for childhood obesity. COVID‐19 related changes, such as home confinement, influence a child's risk of obesity. Using Dahlgren and Whitehead's model of the main determinants of health, this paper aims to provide a roadmap for future research on sex, gender, and childhood obesity during the time of COVID‐19. It examines how COVID‐19 has led to important changes in children's general socioeconomic, cultural, and environmental conditions, social and community networks, and individual lifestyle factors and how these may affect a child's risk for obesity. It focuses on the influence of gender and sex and outlines key considerations and indicators to examine in future studies concerned with promoting health and gender equity and equality. We need to understand the differential impact of COVID‐19 related measures on girls' and boys' risk for obesity to adequately react with preventive measures, policies, and programs.