The purpose of this study is to test the relationship among green logistics, environmental degradation, and energy demand. The system generalized method of moment (system GMM) is used to study the data of Asian countries and four subregions in Asia. The estimation results show that logistics operation consumes nonrenewable energy such as fossil fuels, which has a negative impact on environmental sustainability and energy demand. The service quality and capability (LPITC) in the logistics performance index has a significant contribution to reducing carbon dioxide emissions. The logistics infrastructure (LPIIN) has significantly reduced the energy consumption in Asia, while the customs (LPIC) has significantly increased the energy demand. Other indicators of LPI also have a significant impact on the environment and energy in different subregions of Asia. Industrialization and urbanization both increase carbon emissions in Asia, while trade opening reduces carbon emissions. At the same time, these three variables have a positive impact on reducing energy consumption. The results show that logistics performance is significantly related to environmental degradation and energy, and renewable energy and green supply chain management can reduce the harmful effects of logistics activities on environment and energy. Therefore, Asian countries should give priority to environmental sustainability in supply chain management and encourage the application of green practices in logistics.

Research has found that the transfer of agricultural land in China has to some extent led to agricultural carbon emissions. Therefore, it is urgent to systematically analyze the reasons for carbon emissions caused by agricultural land transfer, find ways to mitigate the increase in agricultural carbon emissions, and achieve low-carbon and sustainable development of agriculture. This article analyzes the relationship between agricultural land transfer, rural human capital, and agricultural carbon emissions in 30 sample provinces in China based on property rights incentives and scale operation theory, using the system GMM model, adjustment model, and threshold model. The results indicate that the transfer of agricultural land has, to some extent, intensified agricultural carbon emissions, with an increase of 0.003 units per unit of agricultural land transfer intensity. Rural human capital has mitigated the carbon emissions resulting from agricultural land transfer and played a corrective role. Under varying levels of rural human capital, there exists a dual threshold effect on the impact of agricultural land transfer on carbon emission intensity, exhibiting a pattern of ‘ineffectiveness-promotion-inhibition’. The analysis of regional heterogeneity reveals significant differences in the relationship between agricultural land transfer and carbon emissions between major grain-producing areas and non-grain-producing areas. It is worth noting that in the northern region, the transfer of agricultural land exacerbates carbon emissions, whereas in the southern region, higher levels of rural human capital effectively curb the growth of carbon emissions. Furthermore, the impact of agricultural land transfer on carbon emissions is not confined to specific regions, indicating that its environmental consequences transcend administrative boundaries and spread geographically, displaying distinct time-dependent characteristics.

Biogas production is widely recognized as an effective solution for addressing agricultural waste treatment in rural areas. However, its development is often hindered by economic and environmental constraints. This study combined emergy evaluation and carbon footprint analysis methods to establish a new environmental radius assessment model for evaluating the ecological performance and optimization direction of an agricultural waste biogas production system, using a biogas production company in China as a case study. Compared with the straw return model and straw power generation model, the results of emergy indicators and carbon accounting showed that the biogas production model had a lower environmental load and higher economic output and level of emergy sustainability. Additionally, the biogas production system was found to reduce 0.47 kg of carbon emissions per 1 kg of agricultural waste utilized. The application of the biogas production model in rural areas had high ecological sustainability and carbon emission reduction benefits. Environmental radius assessment results confirmed that the reasonable changes in resource collection distance could further enhance the ecological sustainability, carbon mitigation ability, and economic benefits of the biogas production system. The environmental radius assessment method offers a new approach to the location planning of agricultural waste biogas utilization companies in rural areas.