In patients with diabetes, metabolic disorders disturb the physiological balance of coagulation and fibrinolysis, leading to a prothrombotic state characterized by platelet hypersensitivity, coagulation disorders and hypofibrinolysis. Hyperglycemia and insulin resistance cause changes in platelet number and activation, as well as qualitative and/or quantitative modifications of coagulatory and fibrinolytic factors, resulting in the formation of fibrinolysis-resistant clots in patients with diabetes. Other coexisting factors like hypoglycemia, obesity and dyslipidemia also contribute to coagulation disorders in patients with diabetes. Management of the prothrombotic state includes antiplatelet and anticoagulation therapies for diabetes patients with either a history of cardiovascular disease or prone to a higher risk of thrombus generation, but current guidelines lack recommendations on the optimal antithrombotic treatment for these patients. Metabolic optimizations like glucose control, lipid-lowering, and weight loss also improve coagulation disorders of diabetes patients. Intriguing, glucose-lowering drugs, especially cardiovascular beneficial agents, such as glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and sodium glucose co-transporter inhibitors, have been shown to exert direct anticoagulation effects in patients with diabetes. This review focuses on the most recent progress in the development and management of diabetes related prothrombotic state.

SGLT-2i’s exert direct anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidative effects on resting endothelial cells. However, endothelial cells are constantly exposed to mechanical forces such as cyclic stretch. Enhanced stretch increases the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and thereby impairs endothelial barrier function. We hypothesized that the SGLT-2i’s empagliflozin (EMPA), dapagliflozin (DAPA) and canagliflozin (CANA) exert an anti-oxidative effect and alleviate cyclic stretch-induced endothelial permeability in human coronary artery endothelial cells (HCAECs). HCAECs were pre-incubated with one of the SGLT-2i’s (1 µM EMPA, 1 µM DAPA and 3 µM CANA) for 2 h, followed by 10% stretch for 24 h. HCAECs exposed to 5% stretch were considered as control. Involvement of ROS was measured using N-acetyl-l-cysteine (NAC). The sodium-hydrogen exchanger 1 (NHE1) and NADPH oxidases (NOXs) were inhibited by cariporide, or GKT136901, respectively. Cell permeability and ROS were investigated by fluorescence intensity imaging. Cell permeability and ROS production were increased by 10% stretch; EMPA, DAPA and CANA decreased this effect significantly. Cariporide and GKT136901 inhibited stretch-induced ROS production but neither of them further reduced ROS production when combined with EMPA. SGLT-2i’s improve the barrier dysfunction of HCAECs under enhanced stretch and this effect might be mediated through scavenging of ROS. Anti-oxidative effect of SGLT-2i’s might be partially mediated by inhibition of NHE1 and NOXs.

Purpose: Vascular inflammation and disturbed metabolism are observed in heart failure and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Glycolytic enzyme hexokinase II (HKII) is upregulated by inflammation. We hypothesized that SGLT2 inhibitors Canagliflozin (Cana), Empagliflozin (Empa) or Dapagliflozin (Dapa) reduces inflammation via HKII in endothelial cells, and that HKII-dependent inflammation is determined by ERK1/2, NF-κB. and/or AMPK activity in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated human coronary artery endothelial cells (HCAECs). Methods: HCAECs were pre-incubated with 3 μM or 10 μM Cana, 1 μM, 3 μM or 10 μM Empa or 0.5 μM, 3 μM or 10 μM Dapa (16 h) and subjected to 3 h LPS (1 μg/mL). HKII was silenced via siRNA transfection. Interleukin-6 (IL-6) release was measured by ELISA. Protein levels of HK I and II, ERK1/2, AMPK and NF-κB were detected using infra-red western blot. Results: LPS increased IL-6 release and ERK1/2 phosphorylation; Cana prevented these pro-inflammatory responses (IL-6: pg/ml, control 46 ± 2, LPS 280 ± 154 p < 0.01 vs. control, LPS + Cana 96 ± 40, p < 0.05 vs. LPS). Cana reduced HKII expression (HKII/GAPDH, control 0.91 ± 0.16, Cana 0.71 ± 0.13 p < 0.05 vs. control, LPS 1.02 ± 0.25, LPS + Cana 0.82 ± 0.24 p < 0.05 vs. LPS). Empa and Dapa were without effect on IL-6 release and HKII expression in the model used. Knockdown of HKII by 37% resulted caused partial loss of Cana-mediated IL-6 reduction (pg/ml, control 35 ± 5, LPS 188 ± 115 p < 0.05 vs. control, LPS + Cana 124 ± 75) and ERK1/2 activation by LPS. In LPS-stimulated HCAECs, Cana, but not Empa or Dapa, activated AMPK. AMPK activator A769662 reduced IL-6 release. Conclusion: Cana conveys anti-inflammatory actions in LPS-treated HCAECs through 1) reductions in HKII and ERK1/2 phosphorylation and 2) AMPK activation. These data suggest a novel anti-inflammatory mechanism of Cana through HKII.

Pharmacological conditioning aims to protect the heart from myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI). Despite extensive research in this area, today, a significant gap remains between experimental findings and clinical practice. This review provides an update on recent developments in pharmacological conditioning in the experimental setting and summarizes the clinical evidence of these cardioprotective strategies in the perioperative setting. We start describing the crucial cellular processes during ischemia and reperfusion that drive acute IRI through changes in critical compounds (∆G_ATP, Na⁺, Ca²⁺, pH, glycogen, succinate, glucose-6-phosphate, mitoHKII, acylcarnitines, BH₄, and NAD⁺). These compounds all precipitate common end-effector mechanisms of IRI, such as reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, Ca²⁺ overload, and mitochondrial permeability transition pore opening (mPTP). We further discuss novel promising interventions targeting these processes, with emphasis on cardiomyocytes and the endothelium. The limited translatability from basic research to clinical practice is likely due to the lack of comorbidities, comedications, and peri-operative treatments in preclinical animal models, employing only monotherapy/monointervention, and the use of no-flow (always in preclinical models) versus low-flow ischemia (often in humans). Future research should focus on improved matching between preclinical models and clinical reality, and on aligning multitarget therapy with optimized dosing and timing towards the human condition.

Sodium glucose co‐transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT‐2is) improve cardiovascular outcomes in both diabetic and non‐diabetic patients. Preclinical studies suggest that SGLT‐2is directly affect endothelial function in a glucose‐independent manner. The effects of SGLT‐2is include decreased oxidative stress and inflammatory reactions in endothelial cells. Furthermore, SGLT2is restore endothelium‐related vasodilation and regulate angiogenesis. The favourable cardiovascular effects of SGLT‐2is could be mediated via a number of pathways: (1) inhibition of the overactive sodium‐hydrogen exchanger; (2) decreased expression of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidases; (3) alleviation of mitochondrial injury; (4) suppression of inflammation‐related signalling pathways (e.g., by affecting NF‐κB); (5) modulation of glycolysis; and (6) recovery of impaired NO bioavailability. This review focuses on the most recent progress and existing gaps in preclinical investigations concerning the direct effects of SGLT‐2is on endothelial dysfunction and the mechanisms underlying such effects.