Ilya Shmulevich

Prof. Dr. Ilya Shmulevich

Institute for Systems Biology, Seattle, WA 98103, USA

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

25Years (2002-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2018 in Immunity
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DGDavid L. Gibbs
David L. Gibbs
SBScott D. Brown
Scott D. Brown
DWDenise Wolf
Denise Wolf
DBDante S. Bortone
Dante S. Bortone
TYTai-Hsien Ou Yang
Tai-Hsien Ou Yang
BVBenjamin G. Vincent
Benjamin G. Vincent
We performed an extensive immunogenomic analysis of more than 10,000 tumors comprising 33 diverse cancer types by utilizing data compiled by TCGA. Across cancer types, we identified six immune subtypes-wound healing, IFN-γ dominant, inflammatory, lymphocyte depleted, immunologically quiet, and TGF-β dominant-characterized by differences in macrophage or lymphocyte signatures, Th1:Th2 cell ratio, extent of intratumoral heterogeneity, aneuploidy, extent of neoantigen load, overall cell proliferation, expression of immunomodulatory genes, and prognosis. Specific driver mutations correlated with lower (CTNNB1, NRAS, or IDH1) or higher (BRAF, TP53, or CASP8) leukocyte levels across all cancers. Multiple control modalities of the intracellular and extracellular networks (transcription, microRNAs, copy number, and epigenetic processes) were involved in tumor-immune cell interactions, both across and within immune subtypes. Our immunogenomics pipeline to characterize these heterogeneous tumors and the resulting data are intended to serve as a resource for future targeted studies to further advance the field.

1 February 2002 in Bioinformatics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Ilya ShmulevichIlya Shmulevich
Ilya Shmulevich
EDEdward R. Dougherty
Edward R. Dougherty
SKSeungchan Kim
Seungchan Kim
WZWei Zhang
Wei Zhang
Motivation: Our goal is to construct a model for genetic regulatory networks such that the model class: (i) incorporates rule-based dependencies between genes; (ii) allows the systematic study of global network dynamics; (iii) is able to cope with uncertainty, both in the data and the model selection; and (iv) permits the quantification of the relative influence and sensitivity of genes in their interactions with other genes. Results: We introduce Probabilistic Boolean Networks (PBN) that share the appealing rule-based properties of Boolean networks, but are robust in the face of uncertainty. We show how the dynamics of these networks can be studied in the probabilistic context of Markov chains, with standard Boolean networks being special cases. Then, we discuss the relationship between PBNs and Bayesian networks—a family of graphical models that explicitly represent probabilistic relationships between variables. We show how probabilistic dependencies between a gene and its parent genes, constituting the basic building blocks of Bayesian networks, can be obtained from PBNs. Finally, we present methods for quantifying the influence of genes on other genes, within the context of PBNs. Examples illustrating the above concepts are presented throughout the paper. Contact: is@ieee.org

1 October 2002 in Bioinformatics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Ilya ShmulevichIlya Shmulevich
Ilya Shmulevich
EDEdward R. Dougherty
Edward R. Dougherty
WZWei Zhang
Wei Zhang
Motivation: A major objective of gene regulatory network modeling, in addition to gaining a deeper understanding of genetic regulation and control, is the development of computational tools for the identification and discovery of potential targets for therapeutic intervention in diseases such as cancer. We consider the general question of the potential effect of individual genes on the global dynamical network behavior, both from the view of random gene perturbation as well as intervention in order to elicit desired network behavior. Results: Using a recently introduced class of models, called Probabilistic Boolean Networks (PBNs), this paper develops a model for random gene perturbations and derives an explicit formula for the transition probabilities in the new PBN model. This result provides a building block for performing simulations and deriving other results concerning network dynamics. An example is provided to show how the gene perturbation model can be used to compute long-term influences of genes on other genes. Following this, the problem of intervention is addressed via the development of several computational tools based on first-passage times in Markov chains. The consequence is a methodology for finding the best gene with which to intervene in order to most likely achieve desirable network behavior. The ideas are illustrated with several examples in which the goal is to induce the network to transition into a desired state, or set of states. The corresponding issue of avoiding undesirable states is also addressed. Finally, the paper turns to the important problem of assessing the effect of gene perturbations on long-run network behavior. A bound on the steady-state probabilities is derived in terms of the perturbation probability. The result demonstrates that states of the network that are more ‘easily reachable’ from other states are more stable in the presence of gene perturbations. Consequently, these are hypothesized to correspond to cellular functional states. Availability: A library of functions written in MATLAB for simulating PBNs, constructing state-transition matrices, computing steady-state distributions, computing influences, modeling random gene perturbations, and finding optimal intervention targets, as described in this paper, is available on request from is@ieee.org. Contact: is@ieee.org * To whom correspondence should be addressed.

1 April 2018 in Cell Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RJReyka G. Jayasinghe
Reyka G. Jayasinghe
SCSong Cao
Song Cao
QGQingsong Gao
Qingsong Gao
MWMichael C. Wendl
Michael C. Wendl
NVNam Sy Vo
Nam Sy Vo
FCFeng Chen
Feng Chen
For the past decade, cancer genomic studies have focused on mutations leading to splice-site disruption, overlooking those having splice-creating potential. Here, we applied a bioinformatic tool, MiSplice, for the large-scale discovery of splice-site-creating mutations (SCMs) across 8,656 TCGA tumors. We report 1,964 originally mis-annotated mutations having clear evidence of creating alternative splice junctions. TP53 and GATA3 have 26 and 18 SCMs, respectively, and ATRX has 5 from lower-grade gliomas. Mutations in 11 genes, including PARP1, BRCA1, and BAP1, were experimentally validated for splice-site-creating function. Notably, we found that neoantigens induced by SCMs are likely several folds more immunogenic compared to missense mutations, exemplified by the recurrent GATA3 SCM. Further, high expression of PD-1 and PD-L1 was observed in tumors with SCMs, suggesting candidates for immune blockade therapy. Our work highlights the importance of integrating DNA and RNA data for understanding the functional and the clinical implications of mutations in human diseases.

12 February 2008 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MNMatti Nykter
Matti Nykter
NPNathan Price
Nathan Price
MAMaximino Aldana
Maximino Aldana
SRStephen A. Ramsey
Stephen A. Ramsey
SKStuart A. Kauffman
Stuart A. Kauffman
Ilya ShmulevichIlya Shmulevich
Ilya Shmulevich
Cells are dynamical systems of biomolecular interactions that process information from their environment to mount diverse yet specific responses. A key property of many self-organized systems is that of criticality: a state of a system in which, on average, perturbations are neither dampened nor amplified, but are propagated over long temporal or spatial scales. Criticality enables the coordination of complex macroscopic behaviors that strike an optimal balance between stability and adaptability. It has long been hypothesized that biological systems are critical. Here, we address this hypothesis experimentally for system-wide gene expression dynamics in the macrophage. To this end, we have developed a method, based on algorithmic information theory, to assess macrophage criticality, and we have validated the method on networks with known properties. Using global gene expression data from macrophages stimulated with a variety of Toll-like receptor agonists, we found that macrophage dynamics are indeed critical, providing the most compelling evidence to date for this general principle of dynamics in biological systems.

9 September 2005 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Ilya ShmulevichIlya Shmulevich
Ilya Shmulevich
SKStuart A. Kauffman
Stuart A. Kauffman
MAMaximino Aldana
Maximino Aldana
Two important theoretical approaches have been developed to generically characterize the relationship between the structure and function of large genetic networks: The continuous approach, based on reaction-kinetics differential equations, and the Boolean approach, based on difference equations and discrete logical rules. These two approaches do not always coincide in their predictions for the same system. Nonetheless, both of them predict that the highly nonlinear dynamics exhibited by genetic regulatory systems can be characterized into two broad regimes, to wit, an ordered regime where the system is robust against perturbations, and a chaotic regime where the system is extremely sensitive to perturbations. It has been a plausible and long-standing hypothesis that genomic regulatory networks of real cells operate in the ordered regime or at the border between order and chaos. This hypothesis is indirectly supported by the robustness and stability observed in the phenotypic traits of living organisms under genetic perturbations. However, there has been no systematic study to determine whether the gene-expression patterns of real cells are compatible with the dynamically ordered regimes predicted by theoretical models. Using the Boolean approach, here we show what we believe to be the first direct evidence that the underlying genetic network of HeLa cells appears to operate either in the ordered regime or at the border between order and chaos but does not appear to be chaotic.