Martin A. Wilkes

Dr. Martin A. Wilkes


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
18 December 2017 in Nature Ecology & Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LBLee E. Brown
Lee E. Brown
KKKieran Khamis
Kieran Khamis
MWMartin A. Wilkes
Martin A. Wilkes
PBPhillip Blaen
Phillip Blaen
JBJohn E. Brittain
John E. Brittain
AMAlexander M. Milner
Alexander M. Milner

9 August 2018 in Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KBKim Birnie‐Gauvin
Kim Birnie‐Gauvin
PFPaul Franklin
Paul Franklin
MWMartin A. Wilkes
Martin A. Wilkes
KAKim Aarestrup
Kim Aarestrup

25 December 2018 in WIREs Water
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MWMartin A. Wilkes
Martin A. Wilkes
JGJoshua R. Gittins
Joshua R. Gittins
KMKate L. Mathers
Kate L. Mathers
RMRichard Mason
Richard Mason
RCRoser Casas-Mulet
Roser Casas-Mulet
JJJ. Iwan Jones
J. Iwan Jones

9 August 2018 in River Research and Applications
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MWMartin A. Wilkes
Martin A. Wilkes
JWJ. A. Webb
J. A. Webb
PPPaulo Santos Pompeu
Paulo Santos Pompeu
LSL. G. M. Silva
L. G. M. Silva
AVA. S. Vowles
A. S. Vowles
PKP. S. Kemp
P. S. Kemp

1 June 2018 in Science of The Total Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NCNicole Colin
Nicole Colin
SVSébastien Villéger
Sébastien Villéger
MWMartin A. Wilkes
Martin A. Wilkes
ASAdolfo de Sostoa
Adolfo de Sostoa
AMAlberto Maceda-Veiga
Alberto Maceda-Veiga

26 November 2021 in Water
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Judy EnglandJudy England
Judy England
NANatalie Angelopoulos
Natalie Angelopoulos
SCSusan Cooksley
Susan Cooksley
JDJennifer Dodd
Jennifer Dodd
AGAndrew Gill
Andrew Gill
MWMartin A. Wilkes
Martin A. Wilkes
Nature-based solutions are widely advocated for freshwater ecosystem conservation and restoration. As increasing amounts of river restoration are undertaken, the need to understand the ecological response to different measures and where measures are best applied becomes more pressing. It is essential that appraisal methods follow a sound scientific approach. Here, experienced restoration appraisal experts review current best practice and academic knowledge to make recommendations and provide guidance that will enable practitioners to gather and analyse meaningful data, using scientific rigor to appraise restoration success. What should be monitored depends on the river type and the type and scale of intervention. By understanding how habitats are likely to change we can anticipate what species, life stages, and communities are likely to be affected. Monitoring should therefore be integrated and include both environmental/habitat and biota assessments. A robust scientific approach to monitoring and appraisal is resource intensive. We recommend that appraisal efforts be directed to where they will provide the greatest evidence, including ‘flagship’ restoration schemes for detailed long-term monitoring. Such an approach will provide the evidence needed to understand which restoration measures work where and ensure that they can be applied with confidence elsewhere.