Georgios Georgiopoulos

Dr. Georgios Georgiopoulos


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
29 July 2020 in European Journal of Clinical Investigation
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SFStefano Figliozzi
Stefano Figliozzi
PMPier Giorgio Masci
Pier Giorgio Masci
NANavid Ahmadi
Navid Ahmadi
LTLara Tondi
Lara Tondi
EKEvangelia Koutli
Evangelia Koutli
GGGeorgios Georgiopoulos
Georgios Georgiopoulos
Background Identification of reliable outcome predictors in Corona virus disease‐2019 (Covid‐19) is of paramount importance for improving patient’s management. Methods A systematic review of literature was conducted until April 24th, 2020. From 6,843 articles, 49 studies were selected for a pooled assessment; cumulative statistics for age and sex were retrieved in 587,790 and 602,234 cases. Two endpoints were defined: 1) a composite outcome including death, severe presentation, hospitalization in intensive care unit (ICU) and/or mechanical ventilation; 2) in‐hospital mortality. We extracted numeric data on patients’ characteristics and cases with adverse outcomes and employed inverse variance random effects models to derive pooled estimates. Results We identified 18 and 12 factors associated with the composite endpoint and death, respectively. Among those, a history of CVD (odds ratio (OR)=3.15, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 2.26‐4.41), acute cardiac (OR=10.58, 5.00‐22.40) or kidney (OR=5.13, 1.78‐14.83) injury, increased procalcitonin (OR=4.8, 2.034‐11.31) or D‐dimer (OR=3.7, 1.74‐7.89), and thrombocytopenia (OR=6.23, 1.031‐37.67) conveyed the highest odds for the adverse composite endpoint. Advanced age, male sex, cardiovascular comorbidities, acute cardiac or kidney injury, lymphocytopenia and D‐dimer conferred an increased risk of in‐hospital death. With respect to the treatment of the acute phase, therapy with steroids was associated with the adverse composite endpoint (OR=3.61, 95% CI 1.934‐6.73), but not with mortality. Conclusions Advanced age, comorbidities, abnormal inflammatory and organ injury circulating biomarkers captured patients with an adverse clinical outcome. Clinical history and laboratory profile may then help identify patients with a higher risk of in‐hospital mortality.

1 January 2023 in Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SFStefano Figliozzi
Stefano Figliozzi
GGGeorgios Georgiopoulos
Georgios Georgiopoulos
PLPedro M. Lopes
Pedro M. Lopes
KBKlemens B. Bauer
Klemens B. Bauer
SMSara Moura-Ferreira
Sara Moura-Ferreira
PMPier-Giorgio Masci
Pier-Giorgio Masci
In mitral valve prolapse, myocardial fibrosis at cardiac MRI was associated with an increased risk of unexplained syncope, sustained ventricular tachycardia, or sudden cardiac death. Background Patients with mitral valve prolapse (MVP) may develop adverse outcomes even in the absence of mitral regurgitation or left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. Purpose To investigate the progno...

22 March 2019 in The Journal of Clinical Hypertension
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NMNikolaos Magkas
Nikolaos Magkas
CTCostas Tsioufis
Costas Tsioufis
CTCostas Thomopoulos
Costas Thomopoulos
PDPolychronis Dilaveris
Polychronis Dilaveris
GGGeorgios Georgiopoulos
Georgios Georgiopoulos
DTDimitrios Tousoulis
Dimitrios Tousoulis
Orthostatic hypotension (OH), that is blood pressure fall when standing from the supine to the erect position, is a common cardiovascular disorder, highly prevalent in elderly and frail individuals and in patients with multiple comorbidities. Orthostatic hypotension is considered a manifestation of dysfunction of the autonomic nervous system, caused or facilitated by several neurological or non‐neurological diseases and conditions, while its clinical significance is increasingly recognized as a cause of impairment of quality of life and potentially of worse outcomes. Indeed, OH has been extensively studied and numerous prospective cohort studies support its association with adverse events, including coronary artery disease, heart failure, stroke, cognitive dysfunction, and, most importantly, mortality rates. Specific pharmacological and non‐pharmacological interventions have been established for the treatment of OH. However, randomized data evaluating the impact of therapeutic interventions on morbidity and mortality outcomes are lacking. Thus, despite that OH seems to have important prognostic implications indicated by several reported associations with adverse events, it remains unclear whether OH treatment could improve prognosis. In the present review, we discuss the clinical applications associated with ΟΗ by outlining the current perspectives on ΟΗ definition, diagnosis, pathophysiology, prognostic role, and treatment.

24 March 2022 in European Heart Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SKSimon Kraler
Simon Kraler
FWFlorian A Wenzl
Florian A Wenzl
GGGeorgios Georgiopoulos
Georgios Georgiopoulos
SOSlayman Obeid
Slayman Obeid
LLLuca Liberale
Luca Liberale
TLThomas F. Lüscher
Thomas F. Lüscher
The lectin-like oxidized low-density lipoprotein receptor-1 (LOX-1) and its shedding product [soluble LOX-1 (sLOX-1)] are implicated in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) pathogenesis. Herein, we examined the relationship of sLOX-1 with both fatal events and plaque progression in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Plasma sLOX-1 was assessed at baseline in ACS and chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) patients prospectively recruited in the multicentre SPUM-ACS study, with sex- and age-matched healthy subjects serving as additional controls (n = 2924). Compared with both CCS and controls, ACS patients showed markedly elevated sLOX-1 levels (median, 2.00 and 2.00 vs. 35.08 pg/mL; P < 0.0001) which were independently associated with increased mortality risk over 30-day [tertile (T)3: adjusted hazard ratio (HR), 3.11; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.44–10.61; P = 0.0055] and 1-year intervals (T3: adjusted HR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.19–3.92; P = 0.0098). Results remained consistent after adjustment for GRACE 2.0 (T3: adjusted HR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.04–3.74; P = 0.0391) and were primarily driven by the pronounced relationship of sLOX-1 with cardiovascular mortality at 30 days (T3: adjusted HR, 3.81; 95% CI, 1.62–19.62; P = 0.0036) and at 1 year (T3: adjusted HR, 2.29; 95% CI, 1.19–5.34; P = 0.0148). In ACS patients undergoing serial intracoronary imaging and statin therapy, sLOX-1 dropped significantly in those with coronary plaque regression at 1 year (ΔsLOX-1: −4.64 ± 1.80; P = 0.0057), and showed a good discrimination for predicting plaque progression (area under the curve = 0.74; 95% CI, 0.59–0.86; P = 0.0031). Plasma sLOX-1 levels are increased during ACS and predict fatal events beyond traditional and emerging risk factors. Persistently high sLOX-1 associates with coronary plaque progression in patients with established ASCVD. NCT01000701. Atherosclerotic plaques express high levels of lectin-like oxidized low-density lipoprotein receptor-1 (LOX-1), with plaque regions particularly prone for instability showing accentuated LOX-1 abundance. The pro-inflammatory milieu within atherosclerotic plaques enhances LOX-1 synthesis, promotes LOX-1 shedding and thus soluble LOX-1 (sLOX-1) release. The turnover of membrane-bound LOX-1 determines plaque composition and thus stability, with systemically circulating sLOX-1 emerging as a novel biomarker reflecting plaque burden and vulnerability. In this multicentre prospective cohort study, we found that plasma levels of sLOX-1 are markedly elevated in patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) when compared with both chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) and healthy subjects (CTRL). High sLOX-1 levels were independently associated with a higher multivariable-adjusted 1-year mortality risk following ACS, a finding that remained consistent after controlling for GRACE 2.0. In patients subjected to serial intravascular ultrasound following the index ACS, sLOX-1 dropped markedly in those with coronary plaque regression, while persistently high sLOX-1 levels were associated with plaque progression. §Adjusted for sex, age, ACS type, hs-CRP, history of hypercholesterolaemia, eGFR, LDL-C, and diagnosis of diabetes; †adjusted for sex, age, ACS type, hs-CRP, history of hypercholesterolaemia, eGFR, LDL-C, diagnosis of diabetes, NT-proBNP, and hs-TnT. ADAM, a disintegrin and metalloproteinase; GRACE, Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events; IVUS, intravascular ultrasound; MMP, matrix metalloproteinase; LOX-1, lectin-like oxidized low-density lipoprotein receptor-1; sLOX-1, soluble LOX-1.

6 February 2019 in The Journal of Clinical Hypertension
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NMNikolaos Magkas
Nikolaos Magkas
CTCostas Tsioufis
Costas Tsioufis
CTCostas Thomopoulos
Costas Thomopoulos
PDPolychronis Dilaveris
Polychronis Dilaveris
GGGeorgios Georgiopoulos
Georgios Georgiopoulos
DTDimitrios Tousoulis
Dimitrios Tousoulis
Orthostatic hypertension (OHT), that is, sustained increase in blood pressure after standing, is an increasingly recognized cardiovascular disorder having been examined in much fewer studies compared with orthostatic hypotension (OH). However, in both OHT and OH, dysfunction of the autonomous nervous system is considered to be the primary pathophysiological disturbance, while significant associations with essential hypertension have been observed. Although in many studies OHT has been related to subclinical or clinical target organ damage, there is also evidence denying such an association. Because OHT is defined variably across different studies, the comparison of relevant outcomes is at least problematic. Since evidence about OHT treatment is exclusively based on limited non‐randomized studies, no specific recommendations have been developed. Therefore, both the prognostic role and the clinical significance of OHT remain largely undefined. The aim of the present review is to summarize the available evidence regarding the definition, diagnosis, pathophysiology, prognostic role and treatment of OHT and highlight potential clinical implications of this underestimated condition.

16 November 2021 in Journal of the American Heart Association
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DSDimitrios Sagris
Dimitrios Sagris
GGGeorgios Georgiopoulos
Georgios Georgiopoulos
KPKonstantinos Pateras
Konstantinos Pateras
KPKalliopi Perlepe
Kalliopi Perlepe
EKEleni Korompoki
Eleni Korompoki
George NtaiosGeorge Ntaios
George Ntaios
Background: Available evidence supports an association between atrial high‐rate episode (AHRE) burden and thromboembolic risk, but the necessary extent and duration of AHREs to increase the thromboembolic risk remain to be defined. The aim of this systematic review and meta‐analysis was to identify the thromboembolic risk associated with various AHRE thresholds. Methods and Results: We searched PubMed and Scopus until January 9, 2020, for literature reporting AHRE duration and thromboembolic risk in patients with implantable electronic devices. The outcome assessed was stroke or systemic embolism. Risk estimates were reported as hazard ratio (HR) or relative risk alongside 95% CIs. We used the Paule‐Mandel estimator, and heterogeneity was calculated with I 2 index. Among 27 studies including 61 919 patients, 23 studies reported rates according to the duration of the longest AHRE and 4 studies reported rates according to the cumulative day‐level AHRE duration. In patients with cardiac implantable devices, AHREs lasting ≥30 seconds significantly increased the risk of stroke or systemic embolism (HR, 4.41; 95% CI, 2.32–8.39; I 2 , 5.5%), which remained consistent for the thresholds of 5 minutes and 6 and 24 hours. Patients with previous stroke or transient ischemic attack and AHREs lasting ≥2 minutes had a marginally increased risk of recurrent stroke or transient ischemic attack. The risk of stroke or systemic embolism was higher in patients with cumulative AHRE ≥24 hours compared with those of shorter duration or no AHRE (HR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.04–1.52; I 2 , 0%). Conclusions: This systematic review and meta‐analysis suggests that single AHRE episodes ≥30 seconds and cumulative AHRE duration ≥24 hours are associated with increased risk of stroke or systemic embolism.