Pablo Suarez-Gonzalez

Prof. Pablo Suarez-Gonzalez


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 November 2017 in Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SCSonia Campos-Soto
Sonia Campos-Soto
ACAlberto Cobos
Alberto Cobos
ECEsmeralda Caus
Esmeralda Caus
MBM. Isabel Benito
M. Isabel Benito
LFLaura Fernández-Labrador
Laura Fernández-Labrador
LALuis Alcalá
Luis Alcalá

1 July 2019 in Earth-Science Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PSPablo Suarez-Gonzalez
Pablo Suarez-Gonzalez
MBM.I. Benito
M.I. Benito
IQI.E. Quijada
I.E. Quijada
RMR. Mas
R. Mas
SCS. Campos-Soto
S. Campos-Soto

1 March 2014 in Sedimentary Geology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PSPablo Suarez-Gonzalez
Pablo Suarez-Gonzalez
IQI. Emma Quijada
I. Emma Quijada
MBM. Isabel Benito
M. Isabel Benito
RMRamón Mas
Ramón Mas
RMRaúl Merinero
Raúl Merinero
RRRobert Riding
Robert Riding


1 February 2015 in Journal of Sedimentary Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PSPablo Suarez-Gonzalez
Pablo Suarez-Gonzalez
IQI. Emma Quijada
I. Emma Quijada
MBM. Isabel Benito
M. Isabel Benito
RMRamón Mas
Ramón Mas
: Coastal wetlands are prominent modern environments widely studied in geomorphology and ecology, but the term “coastal wetland” is still barely used for the sedimentological classification of ancient deposits. The depositional system studied here (Leza Formation, Cameros Basin, Early Cretaceous, N Spain) includes diverse carbonate and clastic facies deposited at the sea–land transition, and is an illustrative example of the wide array of sedimentary environments that may occur in coastal wetlands systems. The studied system was composed mainly of carbonate water bodies whose salinity ranged from fresh to brackish and near-marine, and which had variable input of clastic material due to their lateral connection with alluvial fans. In addition, the system also included carbonate water bodies with stronger marine influence, tide-influenced oolitic areas, and relatively restricted evaporative settings. The deposits of all these environments occur alternating with each other throughout a unit 30–280 m thick, and they range from continental to marine conditions in a relatively small area (approximately 10 km × 30 km). Thus, this sedimentological study of the Leza Fm provides an ideal opportunity to investigate challenging ancient deposits with both continental and marine features. Comparison with other modern and ancient coastal settings allows the conclusion that “coastal wetland” may be the most accurate sedimentological classification for the Leza Fm, since it was not part of a major coastal system (e.g., delta or estuary). A series of general sedimentological characteristics of coastal wetland deposits are gathered from the Cretaceous case study and from the modern and ancient examples examined. These characteristics include: predominance of shallow-water facies; common subaerial exposure and edaphic features; great variety of interrelated continental, transitional, and marine environments with contrasting hydrodynamic and hydrochemical conditions; and low-diversity biotic communities, including both continental and marine fossils, as well as fossils of ambiguous affinities.

1 March 2013 in Journal of Sedimentary Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
IQI. Emma Quijada
I. Emma Quijada
PSPablo Suarez-Gonzalez
Pablo Suarez-Gonzalez
MBM. Isabel Benito
M. Isabel Benito
RMRamón Mas
Ramón Mas
The Lower Cretaceous (Berriasian) Valdeprado Formation (Cameros Basin, northern Spain) contains more than 900 m of laminated carbonates and pseudomorphs after sulfates. Traditionally, many sedimentary packages of different ages and lithologies have been interpreted as deep-water deposits based essentially on the abundance of laminations and the absence of subaerial exposure features. In contrast, the Valdeprado Formation provides an example of a shallow-water deposit dominated by laminations with scarce evidence of subaerial exposure, and gives criteria to solve the challenge of distinguishing shallow-water and deep-water, ancient laminated deposits. The two most abundant facies all along the Valdeprado Formation are: a) parallel-laminated limestone, formed by alternating carbonate mudstone and calcite and quartz pseudomorphs after displacive gypsum, and b) graded-laminated limestone, consisting of quartz, mica, ostracodes, and pseudomorphs after detrital gypsum grains at the base, which changes gradually upwards to carbonate mudstone. Parallel-laminated limestone and graded-laminated limestone could have been deposited in either deep or shallow environments as a result of salinity fluctuations driven by alternation of flooding and evaporation and by sediment resuspension processes, respectively. Subaerial exposure features, such as desiccation mudcracks, are scarce in most of the succession, except in a few meter-scale stratigraphic intervals where they are very abundant. Interestingly, in these intervals desiccation cracks are present at the tops of several successive laminae (up to 25 mudcracked laminae per meter of deposit), indicating that, at least during those periods of time, deposition occurred in shallow water bodies that were desiccated frequently. In the upper part of the stratigraphic section, parallel-laminated and graded-laminated limestones are associated with current-ripple and wave-ripple cross-laminated arenites, and ostracode mudstone to wackestone with centimeter-size pseudomorphs after lenticular gypsum, and abundant desiccation mudcracks and tepees, which also suggest sedimentation in shallow-water environments. Moreover, the laminated carbonates display continuous, parallel layering, and the same facies along the 40-km-long outcropping area. These deposits are directly interbedded with, and pass laterally to, siliciclastic sandy–muddy flat deposits in the western area of the basin, without clinoforms, slump structures, or slide masses in between. All of these features suggest deposition in shallow, perennial carbonate–sulfate water bodies and their peripheral mudflats, developed in a flat-bottomed basin with no marked gradients.