Benjamin Pradere

Dr. Benjamin Pradere

Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 2021 in Journal of Urology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Benjamin PradereBenjamin Pradere
Benjamin Pradere
RVRajan Veeratterapillay
Rajan Veeratterapillay
KDKonstantinos Dimitropoulos
Konstantinos Dimitropoulos
YYYuhong Yuan
Yuhong Yuan
MOMuhammad Imran Omar
Muhammad Imran Omar
APAdrian Pilatz
Adrian Pilatz
Purpose:To identify which non-antibiotic strategies could reduce the risk of infectious complications following prostate biopsy.Materials and Methods:We performed a literature search on MEDLINE, Em...

13 July 2016 in Annals of Surgical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
F(French Comittee Of Urologic Oncology (Ccafu)
French Comittee Of Urologic Oncology (Ccafu)
BPBenoit Peyronnet
Benoit Peyronnet
TSThomas Seisen
Thomas Seisen
EOEmmanuel Oger
Emmanuel Oger
CVChristophe Vaessen
Christophe Vaessen
KBKarim Bensalah
Karim Bensalah

1 August 2020 in Journal of Urology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
APAdrian Pilatz
Adrian Pilatz
KDKonstantinos Dimitropoulos
Konstantinos Dimitropoulos
RVRajan Veeratterapillay
Rajan Veeratterapillay
YYYuhong Yuan
Yuhong Yuan
MOMuhammad Imran Omar
Muhammad Imran Omar
Benjamin PradereBenjamin Pradere
Benjamin Pradere
Purpose:Infectious complications following prostate biopsy (PB) are increasing and fluoroquinolone (FQ) prophylaxis has recently been banned by the European Commission. In this systematic review, w...

1 December 2017 in European Urology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KBKöves Béla
Köves Béla
Tommaso CaiTommaso Cai
Tommaso Cai
RVRajan Veeratterapillay
Rajan Veeratterapillay
RPRobert Pickard
Robert Pickard
TSThomas Seisen
Thomas Seisen
BWBjörn Wullt
Björn Wullt

1 November 2021 in European Urology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PRPawel Rajwa
Pawel Rajwa
Benjamin PradereBenjamin Pradere
Benjamin Pradere
FQFahad Quhal
Fahad Quhal
KMKeiichiro Mori
Keiichiro Mori
ELEkaterina Laukhtina
Ekaterina Laukhtina
GPGuillaume Ploussard
Guillaume Ploussard
Although magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is broadly implemented into active surveillance (AS) protocols, data on the reliability of serial MRI in order to help guide follow-up biopsy are inconclusive. To assess the diagnostic estimates of serial prostate MRI for prostate cancer (PCa) progression during AS. We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases to select studies analyzing the association between changes on serial prostate MRI and PCa progression during AS. We included studies that provided data for MRI progression, which allowed us to calculate diagnostic estimates. We compared Prostate Cancer Radiological Estimation of Change in Sequential Evaluation (PRECISE) accuracy with institution-specific definitions. We included 15 studies with 2240 patients. Six used PRECISE criteria and nine institution-specific definitions of MRI progression. The pooled PCa progression rate, which included histological progression to Gleason grade ≥2, was 27%. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.59 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.44-0.73) and 0.75 (95% CI 0.66-0.84) respectively. There was significant heterogeneity between included studies. Depending on PCa progression prevalence, the pooled negative predictive value for serial prostate MRI ranged from 0.81 (95% CI 0.73-0.88) to 0.88 (95% CI 0.83-0.93) and the pooled positive predictive value ranged from 0.37 (95% CI 0.24-0.54) to 0.50 (95% CI 0.36-0.66). There were no significant differences in the pooled sensitivity (p = 0.37) and specificity (p = 0.74) of PRECISE and institution-specific schemes. Serial MRI still should not be considered a sole factor for excluding PCa progression during AS, and changes on MRI are not accurate enough to indicate PCa progression. There was a nonsignificant trend toward improved diagnostic estimates of PRECISE recommendations. These findings highlight the need to further define the optimal triggers and timing of biopsy during AS, as well as the need for optimizing the quality, interpretation, and reporting of serial prostate MRI. Our study suggests that serial prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) alone in patients on active surveillance is not accurate enough to reliably rule out or rule in prostate cancer progression. Other clinical factors and biomarkers along with serial MRI are required to safely tailor the intensity of follow-up biopsies.

1 December 2021 in European Urology Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ELEkaterina Laukhtina
Ekaterina Laukhtina
SSSung Ryul Shim
Sung Ryul Shim
KMKeiichiro Mori
Keiichiro Mori
DDDavid D‘aNdrea
David D‘aNdrea
FSFrancesco Soria
Francesco Soria
Benjamin PradereBenjamin Pradere
Benjamin Pradere
During the past decade, several urinary biomarker tests (UBTs) for bladder cancer have been developed and made commercially available. However, none of these is recommended by international guidelines so far. To assess the diagnostic estimates of novel commercially available UBTs for diagnosis and surveillance of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) using diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) and network meta-analysis (NMA). PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched up to April 2021 to identify studies addressing the diagnostic values of UBTs: Xpert bladder cancer, Adxbladder, Bladder EpiCheck, Uromonitor and Cxbladder Monitor, and Triage and Detect. The primary endpoint was to assess the pooled diagnostic values for disease recurrence in NMIBC patients using a DTA meta-analysis and to compare them with cytology using an NMA. The secondary endpoints were the diagnostic values for high-grade (HG) recurrence as well as for the initial detection of bladder cancer. Twenty-one studies, comprising 7330 patients, were included in the quantitative synthesis. In most of the studies, there was an unclear risk of bias. For NMIBC surveillance, novel UBTs demonstrated promising pooled diagnostic values with sensitivities up to 93%, specificities up to 84%, positive predictive values up to 67%, and negative predictive value up to 99%. Pooled estimates for the diagnosis of HG recurrence were similar to those for the diagnosis of any-grade recurrence. The analysis of the number of cystoscopies potentially avoided during the follow-up of 1000 patients showed that UBTs might be efficient in reducing the number of avoidable interventions with up to 740 cystoscopies. The NMA revealed that diagnostic values (except specificity) of the novel UBTs were significantly higher than those of cytology for the detection of NMIBC recurrence. There were too little data on UBTs in the primary diagnosis setting to allow a statistical analysis. Our analyses support high diagnostic accuracy of the studied novel UBTs, supporting their utility in the NMIBC surveillance setting. All of these might potentially help prevent unnecessary cystoscopies safely. There are not enough data to reliably assess their use in the primary diagnostic setting. These results have to be confirmed in a larger cohort as well as in head-to-head comparative studies. Nevertheless, our study might help policymakers and stakeholders evaluate the clinical and social impact of the implementation of these tests into daily practice. Novel urinary biomarker tests outperform cytology with the potential of improving routine clinical practice by preventing unnecessary cystoscopic examinations during the surveillance of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer.